![]() |
Originally Posted by johnso29
(Post 1045021)
While the timing of the announcement seems to line up with upcoming Sec 6, I don't think the two are related. I just think DAL has not found an acceptable product. RA has been consistently saying that in order to get the full value of an aircraft you need to OWN it for 30 years. The E190 is not a good product. JB stopped taking delivery of them, Catcus has a small amount, & RAH has a small amount too. The C-Series is a paper airplane, & I don't think we want to commit to it without knowing we can get 25-30 years out of it.
Keep in mind our A319's are pretty young, as are a good amount of our A320's. They aren't replacing all of our 320's with the -900ER, just some older ones. Our A319's are configured to 126 seats. I also feel our NC will not even bring a TA to MEMRAT that has scope relief in it. As a matter of fact, I think we need to worry about Code Share/JV language just as much as seat/weight limitations. It's crucial that we all take the contract survey(available soon) and pound our Reps with priorities. NO MORE SCOPE RELIEF!!!! The best 130ish seat aircraft for us imho is the A319. We've already got them. But of course if you want to move 100 seaters out of mainline, because evidently you've lost your mind about operational and brand control and are blind to what happens if you finance your competition, but if you want to move it there is only one way to make that happen - ask for scope relief from Delta pilots and convince them to say yes. That's IF that is the objective. Trying to be an optimist that producing your core product in house still means something. As to the age of aircraft: http://i938.photobucket.com/albums/a...d/temp6-13.jpg |
Originally Posted by forgot to bid
(Post 1045041)
You know what, PG is missing too.
Maybe Carl and PG are somewhere, together? Maybe riding motorcycles? http://cdn-www.cracked.com/articleim...ise_missle.jpg |
..... ....
|
Thanks FTB. I was certain the most of our A319's were less then 12 years old.
|
Originally Posted by forgot to bid
(Post 1045041)
You know what, PG is missing too.
Maybe Carl and PG are somewhere, together? Maybe riding motorcycles? http://cdn-www.cracked.com/articleim...ise_missle.jpg |
Originally Posted by forgot to bid
(Post 1045043)
Seems as if every aircraft is compromised to chose from. I'll give you that. The E190 has issues but has a nice cabin, the C-Series is awesome but doesn't exist, the 737s and A320s are what they are, and there are a bunch of weird regional jets to compete with the E190 coming out from all over the world.
The best 130ish seat aircraft for us imho is the A319. We've already got them. But of course if you want to move 100 seaters out of mainline, because evidently you've lost your mind about operational and brand control and are blind to what happens if you finance your competition, but if you want to move it there is only one way to make that happen - ask for scope relief from Delta pilots and convince them to say yes. That's IF that is the objective. Trying to be an optimist that producing your core product in house still means something. As to the age of aircraft: http://i938.photobucket.com/albums/a...d/temp6-13.jpg You seem to be good at graphs and analysis. I have said this numerous times. IMHO, I really think it would be cheaper, in the long run, to run our own airplanes with our own pilots/company. Initially, outsourcing works. But the inefficiencies of outsourced works and the different variables of product degradation will come to play. Is there a way you can graph (time line) something like this? Maybe put in variables like: 1) Price to contract DCI 2) Cost of Fuel for DCI 3) Lost customers due to aircraft usage (175s instead of 737s) 4) Lost customers due to "operated by XXXXXXX" I know many family members that will not book a flt on a DCI or Regional Airline 5) Loss of Revenues to DCI strikes and Labor/MGR disputes (ie RAH/F9 vs IBT) I am almost certain that OUTSOURCING is a COSTLY way of doing business. I just think MGT does it to mitigate the cost of negotiating with MAinline pilots and also securing short term bonuses. I think if you can graph and prove this, WE WILL GET BACK ALL OF OUR FLYING. THe proof is in the pudding. TEN |
Originally Posted by Pineapple Guy
(Post 1045061)
LOL - maybe Carl/PG is the same guy, and he is schizophrenic :eek::eek:
Oh no! You did not say that through a sock puppet did you?:eek: |
Originally Posted by forgot to bid
(Post 1044971)
H
As to regionals and scope, that cats out of the bag thanks to the pilots of yesteryear. We cannot put that back together, it's a nonstarter. To take a firm position with scope is shooting yourself in the foot going into negotiations, you just don't do that. |
I posted this in another thread re: Delta’s average salary vs SWA average salary and thought I would put it here as well:
Delta has 314 aircraft that are 737-800 or smaller. That is apx 44% of our fleet and most of these aircraft are larger (better revenue potential) than SWA 737-700s. This means that the other 56% of Delta’s aircraft are much larger and should be much higher paying aircraft bringing the average Delta pilot’s salary up when making a comparison to SWA however that is not the case. Here are the averages for 2009 and 2010: Delta’s average... $132,374, $142,800 – (40% of fleet 737-800 or smaller) SWA’s average... $176,726, $166,673 – (100% of fleet 737-700 or smaller) AMR’s average.... $137,482, $139,872 – (60% of fleet 737-800 or smaller) Continental avg.. $150,211, $156,458 – (57% of fleet 737-800 or smaller) UAL’s average... $125,465, $123,958 – (42% of fleet A320 or smaller) jetBlue’s avg..... $124,680, $140,546 – (100% of fleet A320 or smaller) ALK’s average.... $163,096, $150,061 – (90% of fleet 737-800 or smaller) Based on fleet and average aircraft size we are the next worst paid in the above list. Based on the DOT numbers we easily need a 40K –50K raise to equal SWA if you compare similar sized aircraft. Even ALK and JBL are doing significantly better than Delta narrow body pilots. The interesting number here is Continental’s avg. No wonder their management offered them a cut-and-paste of Delta’s contract. I wonder why these numbers weren’t included in the contract comparison. Source |
Originally Posted by Rhino Driver
(Post 1045036)
Actually, it might be all doors closed. The cargo doors can be opened after the out time is generated, but they might have to be initially closed to generate the out time. On arrival, it's the LAST BRAKE set before the FWD boarding door is opened.
|
| All times are GMT -8. The time now is 06:50 PM. |
Website Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands