![]() |
So many guys are against the B-Scale. But if we could get some 70/76 seaters on property at our negotiated rates is that acceptable? Does anyone feel there is even a shot at doing so? At getting 70/76 seaters in house?
|
Originally Posted by ImTumbleweed
(Post 1045339)
It's Saturday night at the L+G lounge and vollyball park. :D
http://chzgifs.files.wordpress.com/2...snapgirlp1.gif |
Originally Posted by DAL 88 Driver
(Post 1045505)
That's what I'm remembering too, scambo. It was somewhere in that time period... definitely after I got here. I remember they made a big deal about the fact that the B-scale was finally gone. I wish I had saved all the ALPA stuff from back then, because I'm pretty sure they put that in writing somewhere.
In the next contract the B scale was reduced to two years. Years 2 and 3 only and the pay increased to 80 percent of the old A scale in those two years. Effectively 75 percent of the B scale was eliminated. In the 96 contract all percentages were set back to the original A scale and the B scale was happily dead. That contract however introduced express. Express however was not a pay cut for new hires. They got paid about the same on Express as if they had been a 727 SO. The actual pay cut at Express was absorbed by the senior FO's about to upgrade to Captain. 350 Captains positions were removed from the mix delaying FO upgrades substantially. Delta management refused to ever admit there was a B scale since only one pay scale was published in the contract. They did not have to publish a A scale rate because they had no pilots in years 2 to 5 when the 86 contract was signed. This was in fact a Bold Faced Lie because with the purchase of Western Airlines they now a bunch of pilots in years 2 to 5 hired before the start of the B scale. Management secretly paid them A scale wages to avoid lawsuits but never published the A scale rates to avoid upsetting all the pilots at Delta in those same year groups getting paid 40 percent less and yes for you ALPA bashers they went along with that. When the 89 contract was finally signed almost 2 years late there was a very small amount of retro pay back to the amendable date. The B Scale elimination in years 4 and 5 and the pay increase in years 2 and 3 was not however retroactive and no retro paid to those pilots. |
Originally Posted by slowplay
(Post 1045523)
Contract 96 was a concessionary contract (2% paycuts plus Sunshine). Leo the CEO took over 01Sep97. The Spring 1998 MEC meeting was the famous "a contract is a contract" meeting.
Exactly when in 1998 would management have agreed to eliminate the B-scale? |
Originally Posted by johnso29
(Post 1045563)
So many guys are against the B-Scale. But if we could get some 70/76 seaters on property at our negotiated rates is that acceptable? Does anyone feel there is even a shot at doing so? At getting 70/76 seaters in house?
We said we'll fly them, just make an offer on the rates. The boy MBA on the stand said that would exposed those rates to "mainline creep". Mainline creep is a term I've never seen before or since, but that was their argument. But, I agree. Have Delta just make us an offer on the rates and see where it shakes out. Ferd |
Originally Posted by Ferd149
(Post 1045549)
Alright Alright..........I'll switch to Jack while they replenish the stock:eek:
Home from the CQ wars, employed for another year........idiots:D Tennessee football and Jack Daniels.. a match made in heaven. 6 days to go. |
I was wrong!
Originally Posted by DAL 88 Driver
(Post 1045505)
That's what I'm remembering too, scambo. It was somewhere in that time period... definitely after I got here. I remember they made a big deal about the fact that the B-scale was finally gone. I wish I had saved all the ALPA stuff from back then, because I'm pretty sure they put that in writing somewhere.
I WAS WRONG and YOU WERE RIGHT! I am sorry. C2K changed the percentages back to Contract 1982 for years 2 and 3. Year C2K C96 2nd year 53.5% 45% 3rd year 62.1% 54% 4th year 63.1% 63.1% My apologies for the misinformation. Contract 90 eliminated years 4 and 5 of the B-scale, not the whole thing. |
Originally Posted by johnso29
(Post 1045563)
So many guys are against the B-Scale. But if we could get some 70/76 seaters on property at our negotiated rates is that acceptable? Does anyone feel there is even a shot at doing so? At getting 70/76 seaters in house?
|
Originally Posted by tsquare
(Post 1045588)
Switch to Jack?? Switch TO Jack? What self respecting football loving red blooded American male has to SWITCH to Jack.
Tennessee football and Jack Daniels.. a match made in heaven. |
Originally Posted by johnso29
(Post 1045563)
So many guys are against the B-Scale. But if we could get some 70/76 seaters on property at our negotiated rates is that acceptable? Does anyone feel there is even a shot at doing so? At getting 70/76 seaters in house?
|
| All times are GMT -8. The time now is 09:42 PM. |
Website Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands