![]() |
Originally Posted by forgot to bid
(Post 1045307)
Does anyone have the old contract with the B scale pay rates? Curious as to what they were.
|
Originally Posted by DAL 88 Driver
(Post 1045346)
I remember specifically the MD-88 F/O 2nd year rate when I was hired in 1998. It was $65/hour. Adjusted for inflation from 1998 to 2011, that would be $88.23/hour. Current contract 2nd year MD-88 F/O rate? $78.14 (For those of you in Rio Linda/Herndon, that's buying power worse than B-scale.)
|
Originally Posted by Ferd149
(Post 1042475)
Some of the early ones (ie 55xx from the NWA side) not so much. But, the 757-300s and the 565x 757-200s are very young. How old were the ones Momma D got from TWA?
What is going to be a pain in the arse is jumpseating. I flew home on SWA from SLC to PHX last week and thought I was going to die, and that was only an hour something. The other guy took pity on my tallness and let me have the seat in front of the cockpit door even though he was first to sign up. I'm tempering my Skywest comments for awhile :D Ferd |
Originally Posted by x rated
(Post 1045351)
twa first started receiving the 757's in 1996.
|
Originally Posted by DAL 88 Driver
(Post 1045346)
I remember specifically the MD-88 F/O 2nd year B-scale rate when I was hired in 1998. It was $65/hour. Adjusted for inflation from 1998 to 2011, that would be $88.23/hour. Current contract 2nd year MD-88 F/O rate? $78.14 (For those of you in Rio Linda/Herndon, that's buying power worse than B-scale.)
|
Originally Posted by forgot to bid
(Post 1045216)
That brings up a great question, if regional flying is good for mainline pilots then why isn't a b scale good for mainline pilots?
Resurrect a B scale in exchange for ending Delta Con? Pros and cons? The preferred method is to pay according to the productivity of the aircraft. Everyone gets paid the same, then as they have the seniority to bid a more productive jet, they can. ALPA's fear was that bigger airplanes would be parked in favor of smaller aircraft. Hence, put the smaller jets off the property and try to restrict their number. There is a difference between "we want no scope erosion" and "we WANT to fly anything over 76 seats." I'm not sure ALPA has turned the corner and supports the idea of these jets coming to mainline. |
Originally Posted by slowplay
(Post 1045372)
I get your point about the pay rate, but there wasn't a B-scale here when you got hired in 1998. We eliminated it 2 contracts prior for pay beginning September 1, 1992. Only the September '85-'87 hires got to spend the full 5 years on B-scale. We did introduce a 737 C-scale to compete with the wage rates at SWA in POS96, but that was for a fleet of 54 aircraft based in MCO.
|
Originally Posted by Bucking Bar
(Post 1045378)
B Scale "isn't fair" because it treats similarly situated pilots differently. Pilots flying the same equipment over the same routes are paid differently for the same work.
The preferred method is to pay according to the productivity of the aircraft. Everyone gets paid the same, then as they have the seniority to bid a more productive jet, they can. ALPA's fear was that bigger airplanes would be parked in favor of smaller aircraft. Hence, put the smaller jets off the property and try to restrict their number. There is a difference between "we want no scope erosion" and "we WANT to fly anything over 76 seats." I'm not sure ALPA has turned the corner and supports the idea of these jets coming to mainline. But then the flying is shift to a D-scale Delta Con airline and restrict them to 255 jets or what have you. But in the end the 732 got parked (or DC9 today). So to keep the MD88 from being hurt by the 732, we got rid of the 732 and moved flying to new expensive 76 seaters. And pilots lost not only in numbers but they lost the quick upgrade airplane. It just seems better to have a B-scale and the flying on property so that scope truly does trump pay and as Newk said, we can work on the pay later or maybe not, doesn't matter. Scope trumps pay. -------------------------------------- Now, why would ALPA not want E175s at mainline? Delta has 61* of those jets flying around, obviously Delta wants them. Or the CRJ900? 101 of those out there. Combined 162 of the 76 seat jets. But is it DALPA that doesn't want them, ALPA National that doesn't want them or Delta pilots that don't want them? What do you know Bar? Give it up... let's here it... :D |
Originally Posted by DAL 88 Driver
(Post 1045382)
Are you sure about that? I'm almost positive I remember us getting rid of the B-scale after I got here (C2K maybe?). Maybe it wasn't 5 years, but unless I just misunderstood it or don't remember it correctly, I'm pretty sure 2nd year pay was B-scale and there was a huge jump in pay somewhere in the 3, 4, or 5 year time frame? I'm almost certain we called it B-scale. And, no, I'm not talking about Sunshine.
|
Originally Posted by slowplay
(Post 1045372)
I get your point about the pay rate, but there wasn't a B-scale here when you got hired in 1998. We eliminated it 2 contracts prior for pay beginning September 1, 1992. Only the September '85-'87 hires got to spend the full 5 years on B-scale. We did introduce a 737 C-scale to compete with the wage rates at SWA in POS96, but that was for a fleet of 54 aircraft based in MCO.
Not true. The B scale went away while Leo the Ceo was lining his pockets. |
| All times are GMT -8. The time now is 08:46 PM. |
Website Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands