![]() |
Originally Posted by Ferd149
(Post 616798)
Sailing,
Thanks for the info. I agree with you and Alfa, I guess it's just a chicken or egg discussion over Compass since I agree with you that the EMB-175 ain't no RJ.........it's a mainline jet stuck up our bu##s in BK as you said. The Compass guys are our guys, the goal needs to be that they are on our list. Good info on Compass. I was one of those guys who had the wrong impression. But, as Just said, if both sides agree............. Also, Ice as said, what is the cost of the RJs? They get a lot of stuff from us that we don't seem to charge for. I remember when I was still in the USAF I would price tickets home to Ariz from TX and the price from the little town I lived in were the same as if I drove to DFW. Told me that the connection was absorbed into the mainline flight. I guess that is where you get the "hub premium" eh? Interesting discussion. I just wish the MEC would do more than just discuss it. Ferd Also, like someone said earlier, unless DAL strives to recapture ALL 76 seat flying or at least within its wholly owned regionals, it will not work. Just capturing Compass 76 seat jets, 36 in total, will be difficult because of the dynamics with the other wholly owned regionals like OH and XJ. |
Regionals are virtual carriers, they exist because of the mainline.
|
Originally Posted by sailingfun
(Post 616751)
I will answer these also.
B. The 170/175 is a mainline aircraft. It should be flown by the mainline period. We lost it because of a unique combination of circumstances that are not likely to ever occur again. ... Bringing those aircraft back to the mainline will be a long and difficult fight and will have to be done in stages. It is possible however. ... It would also have to be flown at a competitive wage to the competition making it unlikely any pilots on the current mainline list would ever fly it. ... First rule of modern contract negotiations. Take Hostages. We would be handing them to the company on a silver platter. Your point B however is revisionist history. The real path to outsourcing Compass and the E175 is outlined in the NWA Zipline dated October 18, 2004. This was well before bankruptcy. Simply it was a sale of jobs and it bragged that "no other pilot group has received Dollar Credits for such a provision." It was also predicted that none of the current NWA pilots jobs were sold with this provision. We can anticipate that Delta pilots jobs were actually sold ... and of course in bankruptcy these "credits" disappeared. What remained was the sale of our jobs. You are correct that we are going to get this back in stages. Do me the favor of explaining why "hostages" on a lower paying airplane, junior to you, are different than our 2007 hires who will likely be on the street under this scope sale? What defines a hostage better? Low pay or no job? Thanks. |
Originally Posted by iceman49
(Post 616834)
Regionals are virtual carriers, they exist because of the mainline.
|
Originally Posted by Lighteningspeed
(Post 616819)
E175 is not an RJ? Then why is CRJ900 an RJ? Both are configured for 76 seats with identical interiors. Only difference is E175s have engines mounted under the wings and slightly wider in the cabin but they have increased drag as compared to CRJ900s. I do not expect to see DAL ordering any more E175s but I think it is very possible DAL may order more CRJ900s. E190s are what you guys should be worried about at this point. I think it might be too late for recapturing 76 seat jets.
Also, like someone said earlier, unless DAL strives to recapture ALL 76 seat flying or at least within its wholly owned regionals, it will not work. Just capturing Compass 76 seat jets, 36 in total, will be difficult because of the dynamics with the other wholly owned regionals like OH and XJ. Your right though, the current battle ground is the EMB-190 and the C-series. But, I refuse to have something done by a bankruptcy judge last forever or be a stepping stone to the next battle. Ferd |
Buck,
Your right on the time line (of course). I remember talking to the FO rep from DTW, who was jumpseating, when he talked in very broad terms about what was about to happen. I was amazed and p***ed, he tried to hose me down. Said it was going to be a better deal than what the bankruptcy judge was going to do........I'm still not convinced. But, yes, we cut a deal but the gun was to our head. Ferd |
Originally Posted by Ferd149
(Post 616798)
Sailing,
Thanks for the info. I agree with you and Alfa, I guess it's just a chicken or egg discussion over Compass since I agree with you that the EMB-175 ain't no RJ.........it's a mainline jet stuck up our bu##s in BK as you said. Ferd We sold the first chicken, depriving ourselves of the benefits of subsequent egg production. As we see with MidWest, management knows where they can find Roosters. The Chicken + Rooster combination is dangerous because they can get in the comfy codeshare nest and procreate, making more chickens. As the number of Chickens grows exponentially they are harder and harder to keep in the roost, they peck at eachother and crap all over the place. But back to the schelp that sold his chicken. Now that he owns fewer and fewer chickens his respect amongst the farmers has decreased and instead of driving the market price for chickens he finds himself having to sell his chickens at whatever price the market will bear. The only way to re-establish our dominance of the chicken market is to negotiate and recapture the return of our chicken. We will gain more pay for our chickens and enjoy their eggs if we do so. Sometimes I wonder why Jesus (and I write this with no sacrilege) didn't just give up on teaching with parables and tell his followers - STOP SCREWING EACH OTHER! |
There would be hostages because it would be very simple for the company to drop the E175 flying if we still had 200 plus airframes flying at the connection carriers. They could fly those airframes more or add some RJ-70's to pick up some flying. They then furlough 360 mainline pilots and suffer little or no route disruptions. They might even do it before contract negotiations if the regionals have to large a cost advantage.
|
Originally Posted by Bucking Bar
(Post 616852)
OK guys, PM me your e-mail and I'll send you the ZipLine where the discussion of the scope sale is outlined. We went to the farmer's market with Chickens to sell a whole year and a half PRIOR to bankruptcy.
We sold the first chicken, depriving ourselves of the benefits of subsequent egg production. As we see with MidWest, management knows where they can find Roosters. The Chicken + Rooster combination is dangerous because they can get in the comfy codeshare nest and procreate, making more chickens. As the number of Chickens grows exponentially they are harder and harder to keep in the roost, they peck at eachother and crap all over the place. But back to the schelp that sold his chicken. Now that he owns fewer and fewer chickens his respect amongst the farmers has decreased and instead of driving the market price for chickens he finds himself having to sell his chickens at whatever price the market will bear. The only way to re-establish our dominance of the chicken market is to negotiate and recapture the return of our chicken. We will gain more pay for our chickens and enjoy their eggs if we do so. Sometimes I wonder why Jesus (and I write this with no sacrilege) didn't just give up on teaching with parables and tell his followers - STOP SCREWING EACH OTHER! I actually had a long unguided discussion with a M88 CA in MCO recently. He was perfectly happy with his pay and benifits and thought it "was about right." Well let me tell you something, I'm not happy at all with our pay and benifits. SCOPE goes way beyond the E175. Why is Alaska and Midwest doing our flying? For those of us not based in Mecca (I'm in LAX) the flying opportunities are weak. For those pax that are comming from SEA to continue to SYD or starting in LAX flying to SEA to continue to NRT, WE should be doing that flying. Call, email, mail, go to the ALPA offices, but tell your reps that you are not happy with the direction DALPA has taken. Give them a chance to voice the direction of the membership and carry it out. If they don't, well a one word quote from Carl "RECALL." BD |
Originally Posted by Bucking Bar
(Post 616846)
You surely meant to write "alter ego." You are correct, they offer Aircraft, Crew, Maintenance and Insurance, or "ACMI" in the nomenclature of our profession.
|
| All times are GMT -8. The time now is 04:11 AM. |
Website Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands