![]() |
Originally Posted by Bucking Bar
(Post 1057929)
My theory remains they are parking crews on the MD88 and staffing most everything else for a capacity reduction. The 767 and ER are one part seasonal and one part a reluctance to close the domestic category in ATL.
We will see on this next bid. Another big purge to the MD88 right seat will be getting the ducks lined up in seniority order. Watch the ratio of MD88 FO's to Captains. |
Originally Posted by hockeypilot44
(Post 1057948)
Does anyone else here think Delta is going to furlough or is Buckingbar in lone company?
TEN |
Originally Posted by hockeypilot44
(Post 1057948)
Does anyone else here think Delta is going to furlough or is Buckingbar in lone company?
What I wrote is how to read the movement in staffing, if that's what we see happen on this next AE. |
American Airlines’ work force is said to rank among the lowest in the industry in terms of productivity and according to management estimates, the airline is at $800 million-a-year disadvantage to competitors on labor costs (See AMR Faces Union Stalemate in Bid for $800 Million Labor Savings).
While competitors have negotiated better deals with the unions through bankruptcy, American continues to honor its expensive labor agreements. The airline has been trying to negotiate new agreements with its union for years now, but the contract negotiations have stalled badly. While labor costs account for about 31% of all operating costs at American, they stand at around 22-23% for Delta and United Continental. Stole the above from Elvis on another thread. Isn't our restoration quest, I think FTB said it's about 750m/yr, about the same as what AMR is behind in the industry? I think we are in a different place than AMR, and I don't think 800m/yr would put us at 31% labor costs. It just struck me, because this could be bad for us going forward. |
If American declares, it WILL be bad for us.
What are US Air's pilot costs? Half of ours', or two thirds? We need our peers to hold up their end of the house we're trying to lift. |
Originally Posted by Bucking Bar
(Post 1057929)
My theory remains they are parking crews on the MD88 and staffing most everything else for a capacity reduction. The 767 and ER are one part seasonal and one part a reluctance to close the domestic category in ATL.
We will see on this next bid. Another big purge to the MD88 right seat will be getting the ducks lined up in seniority order. Watch the ratio of MD88 FO's to Captains. |
Originally Posted by Bucking Bar
(Post 1057969)
If American declares, it WILL be bad for us.
What are US Air's pilot costs? Half of ours', or two thirds? We need our peers to hold up their end of the house we're trying to lift. |
Originally Posted by TenYearsGone
(Post 1057957)
We must be getting close to contact negotiations!!!!!!:D Keep an eye on "crafty" financial data, trends and futures. I am willing to bet they do not look good, what a coincidence.
TEN |
Originally Posted by Bucking Bar
(Post 1057929)
My theory remains they are parking crews on the MD88 and staffing most everything else for a capacity reduction. The 767 and ER are one part seasonal and one part a reluctance to close the domestic category in ATL.
We will see on this next bid. Another big purge to the MD88 right seat will be getting the ducks lined up in seniority order. Watch the ratio of MD88 FO's to Captains. And many of those were put into those airplanes after the June AE including the plug who is now 7ER. So they're moving people or allowing them into those categories. I think they don't want to furlough because of retirements, before it was the merger and now it's retirements and the cheapest place to put them is the 88. So I think when you look at the 88 and 9 you see the airline is overstaffed. But not overstaffed on the 777. Something just makes me think trip parking is a part of that, people don't seem to understand when you go over ALV you reduce the required number of pilots. Unless I'm missing something. |
Originally Posted by RunFast
(Post 1057964)
Stole the above from Elvis on another thread. Isn't our restoration quest, I think FTB said it's about 750m/yr, about the same as what AMR is behind in the industry? I think we are in a different place than AMR, and I don't think 800m/yr would put us at 31% labor costs. It just struck me, because this could be bad for us going forward. All assumptions based only on the 10,700ish pilots flying the line and not NBC or off line. You'd basically take A's current flight pay average of $169K/yr and FO's $118k/yr and knock them up to $245k and $178k respectively. So a $76K/$60K pay raise all things being equal and most importantly :D accurate :o. |
| All times are GMT -8. The time now is 01:03 AM. |
Website Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands