Any "Latest & Greatest" about Delta?
12-02-2011, 06:11 AM
veut gagner à la loterie
Joined APC: Apr 2008
Position: Light Chop
Posts: 23,286
Originally Posted by Jesse
FTB, I think your sense of humor would allow you to enjoy these as much as I do: Best of Craigslist
12-02-2011, 06:13 AM
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Sep 2006
Position: Starboard Side, weekends & holidays.
Posts: 852
12-02-2011, 06:16 AM
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Sep 2008
Position: Kickin’ Back
Posts: 6,971
Originally Posted by sailingfun
I suspect they are right. For pay purposes at least if you start as a regular line holder then those rules apply for the trip. That is a good thing in this case. Your going to get a bunch of credit to start the month. Combined with the layover at home it seems like a good deal to me.
Denny
12-02-2011, 06:20 AM
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Sep 2008
Position: Kickin’ Back
Posts: 6,971
Originally Posted by scambo1
In the bid pack, they always have that transition blurb. You know "if you have a rotation that spills..."
I think ALPA will tell you it isn't a violation of your human rights.
I think ALPA will tell you it isn't a violation of your human rights.
Denny
12-02-2011, 06:25 AM
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Dec 2009
Position: 7ERB
Posts: 2,039
Originally Posted by Superpilot92
thats the NWA way
TEN
12-02-2011, 06:42 AM
Underboob King
Joined APC: May 2005
Position: Guppy Commander
Posts: 4,412
Originally Posted by TenYearsGone
You forgot-->"Silence the Bell"
TEN
TEN
12-02-2011, 07:02 AM
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Sep 2007
Posts: 168
12-02-2011, 07:06 AM
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Feb 2007
Posts: 1,045
Looks like there is a new projected retirements list out.
Only 663 retiring over the five year period, 2012-2016, for an average of only 132/year.
Barring an economic recovery, which results in growth, it could be another four or five years of stagnation considering that we have over a 1000 guys out on MIL/LOA/SIC. Obviously, some of the SIC guys might not return, but you would think that the majority of the MIL/LOA guys are going to return fairly shortly and they represent almost 35% of that number.
At least once we hit 2017 and beyond, things should start looking better...
Only 663 retiring over the five year period, 2012-2016, for an average of only 132/year.
Barring an economic recovery, which results in growth, it could be another four or five years of stagnation considering that we have over a 1000 guys out on MIL/LOA/SIC. Obviously, some of the SIC guys might not return, but you would think that the majority of the MIL/LOA guys are going to return fairly shortly and they represent almost 35% of that number.
At least once we hit 2017 and beyond, things should start looking better...
12-02-2011, 07:55 AM
Underboob King
Joined APC: May 2005
Position: Guppy Commander
Posts: 4,412
Originally Posted by MoonShot
Looks like there is a new projected retirements list out.
Only 663 retiring over the five year period, 2012-2016, for an average of only 132/year.
Barring an economic recovery, which results in growth, it could be another four or five years of stagnation considering that we have over a 1000 guys out on MIL/LOA/SIC. Obviously, some of the SIC guys might not return, but you would think that the majority of the MIL/LOA guys are going to return fairly shortly and they represent almost 35% of that number.
At least once we hit 2017 and beyond, things should start looking better...
Only 663 retiring over the five year period, 2012-2016, for an average of only 132/year.
Barring an economic recovery, which results in growth, it could be another four or five years of stagnation considering that we have over a 1000 guys out on MIL/LOA/SIC. Obviously, some of the SIC guys might not return, but you would think that the majority of the MIL/LOA guys are going to return fairly shortly and they represent almost 35% of that number.
At least once we hit 2017 and beyond, things should start looking better...
12-02-2011, 08:37 AM
seeing the large hubs...
Joined APC: Oct 2006
Position: 73N A
Posts: 3,707
Originally Posted by Superpilot92
doesnt that assume everyone goes to 65? which is worst case scenario right?
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
