![]() |
If someone doesn't hurry up and make all this joint venture stuff with American into a football analogy real soon I'm going to start posting pictures of dudes...
its the only threat I know that is legit around here. |
Originally Posted by forgot to bid
(Post 1096809)
If someone doesn't hurry up and make all this joint venture stuff with American into a football analogy real soon I'm going to start posting pictures of dudes...
its the only threat I know that is legit around here. |
Originally Posted by Jughead
(Post 1096758)
I like chocolate.
Originally Posted by tsquare
(Post 1096760)
Me too!
Originally Posted by georgetg
(Post 1096764)
I 'flutter my wings' when I eat chocolate
Cheers George
Originally Posted by 80ktsClamp
(Post 1096815)
I dunno. This makes my wings flutter more then chocolate! Look at the head on that beer! :p I know. I know. Most don't even notice there is a beer in that picture. :D |
Originally Posted by Wasatch Phantom
(Post 1096802)
ALFA, (ACL and Carl too),
What Carl says pretty much parallels the analysis done by the Boyd Group. Here's a link:http://www.aviationplanning.com/Imag...%20Reality.pdf You may disagree with Boyd's conclusions, but Carl is not "out in left field", so to speak, with his comments as you asserted so aggressively. My prediction is rather than admit Carl was on to something you will follow the DALPA tactic of trying to discredit the messenger (Boyd). |
Originally Posted by johnso29
(Post 1096789)
Latest target I saw was this week. FWIW, I have my scheduled training now showing in icrew.
Where do you find that? I can't seem to load anything past my Jan schedule. |
Originally Posted by Wasatch Phantom
(Post 1096802)
ALFA, (ACL and Carl too),
What Carl says pretty much parallels the analysis done by the Boyd Group. Here's a link:http://www.aviationplanning.com/Imag...%20Reality.pdf You may disagree with Boyd's conclusions, but Carl is not "out in left field", so to speak, with his comments as you asserted so aggressively. My prediction is rather than admit Carl was on to something you will follow the DALPA tactic of trying to discredit the messenger (Boyd). |
Originally Posted by acl65pilot
(Post 1096595)
Frankly complaining about what is already deemed contract language does little good, lets work to change the process and existing language when there is opportunity to do so. That equates to progress and not Monday morning quarterbacking. |
Originally Posted by Wasatch Phantom
(Post 1096802)
ALFA, (ACL and Carl too),
What Carl says pretty much parallels the analysis done by the Boyd Group. Here's a link:http://www.aviationplanning.com/Imag...%20Reality.pdf You may disagree with Boyd's conclusions, but Carl is not "out in left field", so to speak, with his comments as you asserted so aggressively. My prediction is rather than admit Carl was on to something you will follow the DALPA tactic of trying to discredit the messenger (Boyd). Boyd's analysis shows AMR spending $700-800 million a year in interest expense which he touts as the largest non-operating cost. Delta has interest expense exceeding $1 billion per year. If American gets rid of 20% of their debt (which is probably unattainable, but I will be generous) they will reduce their interest expense about $140-160 million per year. They are going to lose $1,400 million this year. So get rid of the $150 million in interest and where does the rest of the $1,250 million or so come from? Labor? No way. That hole is too big. Their pension expense is about $500 million per year. Even if they terminate every defined benefit plan they still don't get there. American's debt is pretty much in line with Delta's on a relative size basis. They will get some temporary relief in Ch 11. They can scrape off all of their teeny (less than 50 seat) rj's. They can get a little in lease costs and accelerating MD-80 retirements. They will get their piece of labor but it won't be $1 billion or more. I still see them having a giant hole in the P+L that can only be filled by more revenue. What Boyd doesn't address is why Delta gained 11% PRASM and American is about half that at 5.8%. Carl doesn't address it either. Why are we able to pay for our rising fuel costs and American can't. That is not about debt that is about revenue. American has always been an industry leader in RASM performance and now they are close to last place. What has changed in the last five years to make that happen? So I am not trashing Boyd, but his analysis is superficial and factually incorrect in many facets. How can Delta support a debt load and pension expense that is larger than American's (proportionally the same size) and yet be doing quite well? Is it really debt and pension, or are those just the things you can attack in Chapter 11? Without revenue gains those won't be enough to make American profitable. |
Originally Posted by il0101
(Post 1096838)
Where do you find that? I can't seem to load anything past my Jan schedule.
If you haven't received the pop up message yet, it's likely they haven't put it on your schedule yet. I'm going in January so I'm guessing they loaded it on there so I can bid accordingly. |
Originally Posted by alfaromeo
(Post 1096859)
So I am not trashing Boyd, but his analysis is superficial and factually incorrect in many facets. How can Delta support a debt load and pension expense that is larger than American's (proportionally the same size) and yet be doing quite well? Is it really debt and pension, or are those just the things you can attack in Chapter 11? Without revenue gains those won't be enough to make American profitable. |
| All times are GMT -8. The time now is 07:47 PM. |
Website Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands