Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Major > Delta
Any "Latest & Greatest" about Delta? >

Any "Latest & Greatest" about Delta?

Search

Notices

Any "Latest & Greatest" about Delta?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 12-19-2011 | 05:48 AM
  #83701  
Carl Spackler's Avatar
Back on TDY
 
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 12,487
Likes: 0
From: 747-400 Captain
Default

Originally Posted by acl65pilot
As with everything, what they printed was factually correct. They were not trending the number of A seats, just one bid to the next.

Go look at our ASM's from 2008-2009 to now.

You know what really irks me? When people are surprised when something like LGA happens. It is legal by our PWA, and until guys "Get Religion" wrt to scope, they are always going to be surprised when the company does something they are totally within their contractual bounds to do. Only way to fix it is to fix the PWA, and until we stop looking at pay over scope, nothing will change. Period.
You know what really irks me?...When you try to pretend now that you weren't one of the surprised. You've done nothing but post the DALPA/management cheerleading on this slot swap. I don't remember a single post in which you warned us that 90% of the flying would go to the regionals. I'll bet you even did the call to action in support of the slot swap. I did not...for just this reason.

Carl
Old 12-19-2011 | 05:53 AM
  #83702  
Carl Spackler's Avatar
Back on TDY
 
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 12,487
Likes: 0
From: 747-400 Captain
Default

Originally Posted by acl65pilot
Carl, I agree that we can vote No, and I am willing and ready to if scope is not fixed in a way that makes us part of the decision process on every deal.
That's good to hear. But I'm telling you that you need to be ready to vote NO in the face of pressure and fear like you've probably never experienced. You literally need to start preparing yourself and your family right now for the fear. Just the same as you are probably already planning financially.

Carl
Old 12-19-2011 | 06:00 AM
  #83703  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Jul 2008
Posts: 5,583
Likes: 326
Default

Originally Posted by Carl Spackler
That's good to hear. But I'm telling you that you need to be ready to vote NO in the face of pressure and fear like you've probably never experienced. You literally need to start preparing yourself and your family right now for the fear. Just the same as you are probably already planning financially.

Carl
Yep. I figure the company will offer something like 20 percent raise up front, higher vacation credit, 100 seaters allowed at the regionals, and a no-furlough clause to assure us we will keep our current jobs. If we vote for it, we might never furlough, but Delta won't hire again for 15 years even with all our retirements coming up. Remember, there's a lot of pilots retiring in the next ten years that could use the money. I would expect them to vote yes to the above proposal. It's a smart business decision on their behalf even if it does screw every pilot in the future. It has been proven over and over again that everyone is out for himself no matter what the consequences.
Old 12-19-2011 | 06:02 AM
  #83704  
tsquare's Avatar
No longer cares
 
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 12,109
Likes: 0
From: 767er Captain
Default

Originally Posted by CVG767A
Ah, yes... Liquid Larry. DFW Refugee and I deployed with him a couple of times. Now there's a guy that had some big layovers. Good F/E, though.

I was in VQ3 from 82-85; DFW was there from 83-86. A fun squadron, but three years of it (and Hawaii) was plenty for me.
Larry came to the P.I. when I was in -50. Hey was a really good engineer except that if there was a scratch on a tire he would not pronounce it good for flight when leaving Pattaya Beach, but it could be on fire in Atsugi and it was good to go... I heard he retired to Hawa'ii somewhere and bought a red corvette. I'll bet it was a show watching him get in that car...
Old 12-19-2011 | 06:10 AM
  #83705  
tsquare's Avatar
No longer cares
 
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 12,109
Likes: 0
From: 767er Captain
Default

Originally Posted by acl65pilot
It will suck more, if pilots choose some flashy pay raise over strong section one changes. If we do, do that, we have no one to blame but ourselves when the JV's, CPA's and code shares keep a coming.
Originally Posted by boog123
If that is brought to this pilot group to vote on, then I expect a resignation of the committee and members that approved it in the first place. PERIOD!
Well.... you guys better pray that the majority of pilots answered their surveys along this line of thinking. In the case of Boog's post, if we find out that the group as a whole wanted those flashy pay rates more than the scope, then the NC will have delivered what the masses wanted. It's a bit premature to hang them until you know all the facts, but if we told them to get scope and they brought money, then I wholeheartedly agree with you... but I will say this: scope is not an absolute. It is negotiable just like anything else.
Old 12-19-2011 | 06:12 AM
  #83706  
tsquare's Avatar
No longer cares
 
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 12,109
Likes: 0
From: 767er Captain
Default

Originally Posted by hockeypilot44
Yep. I figure the company will offer something like 20 percent raise up front, higher vacation credit, 100 seaters allowed at the regionals, and a no-furlough clause to assure us we will keep our current jobs. If we vote for it, we might never furlough, but Delta won't hire again for 15 years even with all our retirements coming up. Remember, there's a lot of pilots retiring in the next ten years that could use the money. I would expect them to vote yes to the above proposal. It's a smart business decision on their behalf even if it does screw every pilot in the future. It has been proven over and over again that everyone is out for himself no matter what the consequences.
All this speculation.. based on what? But what do you care, wouldn't that just make your decision to leave for SWA all that much easier?
Old 12-19-2011 | 06:21 AM
  #83707  
shiznit's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Feb 2009
Posts: 2,642
Likes: 0
From: right for a long, long time
Default

Originally Posted by Carl Spackler
Absolutely incorrect. If we don't agree with our regional competitors on what is in OUR scope opener, the ALPA president becomes directly involved. All of it completely hidden from us. All of it. That's what the language says.



That is pure speculation on your part. This will be the first full-scale test of it that I'm aware of in a Section 6. And we'll not be privy to what was said in any meetings, or what Moak's actions were.



Absolutely incorrect. The ALPA president MUST insert himself in the process if our regional competitors don't agree with what we want to put into OUR scope opener. And we will never know what Moak's influence was. It's all secret.

Carl
Show the wording and an instance of its use. You are incorrect in your "assessment" of Ford/Cooksey.

Or is that "all secret" too.

Seriously Carl, EVERYONE here wants much tighter scope, and is willing to go to the mat for it. We just HAVE to make sure that the effort is pointed at the REAL problem, not some "smoking man" shadow that is controlling the world in secret meetings.

The REALITY is that NO ONE, and I mean NO ONE, has the ability to negotiate Scope and "permitted flying" except the pilots of Delta Air Lines.

You have still yet to convince me how ALPA has benefitted from more RJ flying at Delta.

Mainline DAL = little increase in "smaller" mainline equipment

Comair ALPA = Shrinking to oblivion
ASA ALPA = Talking Furloughs and losing some CR7/9s
PNCL/MES ALPA = lost all SAAB flying
SkyWest NON UNION = Continual incremental growth
RAH Teamsters = Massive gains in DCI flying over the past Decade
GoJet Scab/Teamsters = new deal for 12 of ASA's CR7/9's

So tell me again how ALPA has been helped by poor mainline scope?
How have DCI ALPA pilots benefitted from this "secret language"?

In my opinion:
1. NWA went on strike and still didn't lock down scope.
2. DAL came within 48 hours of a strike to get C2K and didn't lock down scope.
(Why? Because pay trumped protecting the flying, and guys who were voting didn't place a premium on scope. FINALLY guys see the light, and I pity the NC/MEC who doesn't recognize it.)

3. ALPA will benefit by MORE mainline, NOT by continuing to allow lots of "permitted flying" to continue.
Old 12-19-2011 | 06:29 AM
  #83708  
Elliot's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Sep 2008
Posts: 1,685
Likes: 0
From: "Prof" button manipulator
Default

Originally Posted by hockeypilot44
Yep. I figure the company will offer something like 20 percent raise up front, higher vacation credit, 100 seaters allowed at the regionals, and a no-furlough clause to assure us we will keep our current jobs. If we vote for it, we might never furlough, but Delta won't hire again for 15 years even with all our retirements coming up. Remember, there's a lot of pilots retiring in the next ten years that could use the money. I would expect them to vote yes to the above proposal. It's a smart business decision on their behalf even if it does screw every pilot in the future. It has been proven over and over again that everyone is out for himself no matter what the consequences.
The company knows that this wouldn't stand a "snowball's chance in ATL"! It'd be "representational suicide" to even put it to MEMRAT.

While you are correct, there are many retiring in the next ten years. I personally believe, that even the most senior guys on the list understand the effects of a 100-seat airplane at a "contract carrier". (For the same reason the most "junior guys" on the list don't vote for an non-palatable JV with AF/KLM/VA, etc.)

GJ

P.S. Carl calling me naive in.............3..........................2....... .......................1.
Old 12-19-2011 | 06:31 AM
  #83709  
acl65pilot's Avatar
Happy to be here
 
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 18,563
Likes: 0
From: A-320A
Default

Originally Posted by Carl Spackler
You know what really irks me?...When you try to pretend now that you weren't one of the surprised. You've done nothing but post the DALPA/management cheerleading on this slot swap. I don't remember a single post in which you warned us that 90% of the flying would go to the regionals. I'll bet you even did the call to action in support of the slot swap. I did not...for just this reason.

Carl
You are correct, I too was under the assumption that it would be better split. It is not, and I was surprised. What I am not, is wondering how they could do that. As I said it is totally legal within the contract, and that Carl, is where the change needs to come.

In 2009, it would have been a great deal for us. Most of the cities over 750 nn were to be flown by mainline. With the economy in the crapper, I can see why the company is hitting a bunt. They want to fill the slots, but do not want to slash ticket prices to fill a MD-88 or 320 up. I may not like it, but I sure understand the economics of it.

My brother just paid 600 dollars a piece for a direct flight home for Christmas out of LGA. That would not have been possible to demand if they were still trying to fill 100 seats.

The change needs to come to Section 1. The cheer leading that ALPA wanted us to do is logical. The returns again are not proportional because our section 1 does not demand it. The reason it doesn't is because to many of our compatriots do not put Scope as a number 1 priority. Until they do we will see the same things.

Find a way to get this group to mach in unison to recapturing that flying, and you may get it, but when guys secretly and not so secretly state they will vote for X% pay raise over recapture, the issue still resides within our ranks.

ALPA or another union is of no consequence, if they are doing what the pilots want, then the results will be the same.
Old 12-19-2011 | 06:31 AM
  #83710  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 478
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by Carl Spackler
You know what really irks me?...When you try to pretend now that you weren't one of the surprised. You've done nothing but post the DALPA/management cheerleading on this slot swap. I don't remember a single post in which you warned us that 90% of the flying would go to the regionals. I'll bet you even did the call to action in support of the slot swap. I did not...for just this reason.

Carl
Oh great wise and all knowing, where were your posts foretelling of the great LGA RJ infestation???????
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
On Autopilot
Regional
22617
11-05-2021 07:03 AM
AeroCrewSolut
Delta
153
08-14-2018 12:18 PM
Bill Lumberg
Major
71
06-13-2012 08:36 AM
Quagmire
Major
253
04-16-2011 06:19 AM
JiffyLube
Major
12
03-07-2008 04:27 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices