Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Major > Delta
Any "Latest & Greatest" about Delta? >

Any "Latest & Greatest" about Delta?

Search

Notices

Any "Latest & Greatest" about Delta?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 12-19-2011 | 03:31 PM
  #83801  
fisherpilot's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Nov 2010
Posts: 405
Likes: 0
From: Corporate Pilot
Default

Originally Posted by Superpilot92
The millennium class, they told us we were special...lol
We are special!
Old 12-19-2011 | 03:31 PM
  #83802  
80ktsClamp's Avatar
Da Hudge
 
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 17,473
Likes: 0
From: Poodle Whisperer
Default

Originally Posted by RCD73
I found this to be an interesting claim so I looked into it for you

A Jan 2007 hire at SWA can hold any base as a line holding FO within the integrated seniority list. The orders and deliveries show 2.1% growth including the replacement of the convertible 73's and 717's. Upgrade will occur in 7 years from now.

These numbers come from the integrated SWA seniority list, and the calculator provided that shows seniority in all bases and upgrade time.
You looked into it wrong. Slow was right... the person I was referencing was hired a year after me, which what you then responded with was more on base with what I know.

Let me know how that 2.1% growth works out... and keeping all the 717s.
Old 12-19-2011 | 04:01 PM
  #83803  
Carl Spackler's Avatar
Back on TDY
 
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 12,487
Likes: 0
From: 747-400 Captain
Default

Originally Posted by shiznit
Show the wording and an instance of its use. You are incorrect in your "assessment" of Ford/Cooksey.

Or is that "all secret" too.
Here's the wording from the ALPA policy manual on collective bargaining:

---------------------------------------------------------------------------

3. Prior to commencement of any bargaining for any ALPA pilot group within a mainline/express system, the applicable Negotiating Committee will meet with the Negotiating Committees of other ALPA pilot groups in the mainline/express system to review opening scope proposals and how they advance ALPA's scope goals and guidelines. The committees will work with each other to develop a consensus on proposals; if, however, they are unable to do so, subsection 3a below will apply:

a. Following consultation as specified above, and prior to submission of the scope proposal to the airline, the applicable negotiating committee will report to the Scope Subcommittee that ALPA pilot groups have consulted with one another and have or have not reached consensus that the planned scope proposal meets ALPA's scope goals and guidelines; if the latter, Negotiating Committees of other ALPA pilot groups within the system can submit statements of agreement or disagreement to the Scope Subcommittee, which can recommend changes following consultations with the Negotiating Committees involved.

b. The applicable Negotiating Committees and ALPA pilot groups within the mainline/express system will develop in conjuction with the opening proposal agreed reporting benchmarks with respect to developments in on-going scope negotiations which will require that the Negotiating Committee provide updates on the status of scope negotiations to the Scope Subcommittee. In the absesnce of consensual agreements concerning benchmarks, the Scope Subcommittee will determine reporting benchmarks.

4. During the period that final approval of a collective bargaining agreement is subject to Presidential review under the Constitution and By-Laws, MEC designated representatives of all ALPA pilot groups within the mainline/express system may submit comments prior to the Presidential signature concerning conformity of negotiated scope provisions with recommendations of the Scope Subcommittee and Association policy.

----------------------------------------------------------------------------

Pilots can judge for themselves the impact of this language on our upcoming Section 6 negotiations. Understanding that this language applies ONLY to ALPA represented pilot groups.

Carl
Old 12-19-2011 | 04:05 PM
  #83804  
OccupyRestSeat's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Nov 2011
Posts: 107
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by Carl Spackler

Pilots can judge for themselves the impact of this language on our upcoming Section 6 negotiations. Understanding that this language applies ONLY to ALPA represented pilot groups.

Carl
I wonder what percentage of pilots realize this is in place. I hope it's low.

Because if our pilots know about this, and are still convinced that ALPA can get us the best possible deal carrying that anvil, than the pilot group is less astute than I could have imagined.

This needs to be brought up on every trip.
Old 12-19-2011 | 04:23 PM
  #83805  
tsquare's Avatar
No longer cares
 
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 12,109
Likes: 0
From: 767er Captain
Default

Just because you meet with them doesn't mean you can't tell them to pack sand.
Old 12-19-2011 | 04:36 PM
  #83806  
OccupyRestSeat's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Nov 2011
Posts: 107
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by tsquare
Just because you meet with them doesn't mean you can't tell them to pack sand.
Is National going to approve a contract if it recaptures scope (like ours damn well better), but opens itself to a DFR suit from the regionals it also represents?
Old 12-19-2011 | 04:41 PM
  #83807  
acl65pilot's Avatar
Happy to be here
 
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 18,563
Likes: 0
From: A-320A
Default

Originally Posted by tsquare
Just because you meet with them doesn't mean you can't tell them to pack sand.
Exactly and that is exactly what has happened in the past. The test of this committee was the flow though agreements, and they just did that.

Originally Posted by OccupyRestSeat
Is National going to approve a contract if it recaptures scope (like ours damn well better), but opens itself to a DFR suit from the regionals it also represents?
Yes, they will. Let the DFR lawsuit be filed. Almost every attorney will tell this group that the case lacks merit. It is clearly spelled out who has the right to DAL coded flying, and no connection type carrier binds DAL or DAL holdings.
Old 12-19-2011 | 04:48 PM
  #83808  
OccupyRestSeat's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Nov 2011
Posts: 107
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by acl65pilot

Almost every attorney will tell this group that the case lacks merit. It is clearly spelled out who has the right to DAL coded flying, and no connection type carrier binds DAL or DAL holdings.
"Almost every attorney" said we had no case regarding RAH, when the spirit of our contract was certainly violated via the exploitation of a loophole.

You may have faith in our contract, lawyers, and DALPA's spine, but based on precedent, I do not.

See also "Delta Connection" paint discussion in a parallel thread.
Old 12-19-2011 | 05:04 PM
  #83809  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Jul 2008
Posts: 5,583
Likes: 326
Default

Originally Posted by 80ktsClamp
Bull. You'll be 162 if you go at 60... and that's worst case scenario.
How does it seem like everyone on this board knows who I am, but I don't know who anyone is?
Old 12-19-2011 | 05:06 PM
  #83810  
OccupyRestSeat's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Nov 2011
Posts: 107
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by hockeypilot44
How does it seem like everyone on this board knows who I am, but I don't know who anyone is?
Just relax and let it happen.
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
On Autopilot
Regional
22617
11-05-2021 07:03 AM
AeroCrewSolut
Delta
153
08-14-2018 12:18 PM
Bill Lumberg
Major
71
06-13-2012 08:36 AM
Quagmire
Major
253
04-16-2011 06:19 AM
JiffyLube
Major
12
03-07-2008 04:27 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices