![]() |
Gear J Try the Peruvian at Alta
|
Originally Posted by KC10 FATboy
(Post 1108386)
I'm sorry I respectfully disagree. Our operation in ATL makes DAL a lot of money, but it also alienates a lot of our customers. Even the management team admits that they over schedule Atlanta. It is the only hub I've been to where I consistently see people running for connections -- EVERYTIME I am there. When you have that busiest airport in the world it stands to reason you're going to see more passengers in and about the area. And with a greater number in your observation group you shouldn't be surprised to see more who are in the unfortunate sample that are running late. But since you brought it up, I guess you could criticize the company for over scheduling Atlanta, however I think there are a lot of people who get paid to look at that kind of thing and my bet is that with the infrastructure currently available they're coming up with the mix they think is right. From reading your comment about passengers running to make connections it seems you're implying this is due to the scheduling of tight connection times. Now, I guess you could make the argument that some passengers are put off by the connection times they face, but my experience is that a lot of them put that on themselves. i.e. Given the chance, a passenger will more often than not choose the shorter connection time rather than choose to endure a two-hour sit. In fact, when I've tried to book a flight that has a connection through Atlanta, the options Delta provides me for the two legs do not allow for the minimum connection time I would choose if it were made available from the list of connecting flights provided, so instead I've had to book the two flights separately so I can get listed on a flight that has too short of a connection time from the one I want to take into Atlanta. Maybe you were saying it's the total number of flights the company has going through Atlanta; that delays due to a number of reasons result in some passengers arriving late and rushing to make their connection. Either way, reducing the number of flights to provide a more relaxing experience for the customer comes with a lot of drawbacks. |
Originally Posted by 10000
(Post 1108396)
cni187
If you want a Vol 2 on CD-ROM in color let me know. I can send it tomorrow. Ferd can figure out the install part since he just pecks at a keyboard now days. If Carl had a copy, your talking test pilot era. No color back then. Carl |
Originally Posted by Gearjerk
(Post 1108387)
Quick question:
Anyone know of a ski resort near SLC that offers decent airline/military rates? Looking to go over the New Year's Eve weekend, just tapping the knowledge of this board. :) GJ P.S. Be nice to find something ski-in/ski-out, or near a lift. thanks to all replies in advance. Quick START Ski Promotion | Visit Park City |
Originally Posted by forgot to bid
(Post 1108365)
|
Originally Posted by KC10 FATboy
(Post 1108386)
If you did boom limits properly, there shouldn't have been a problem. And yes, the KC-10 hates you (130s). Throwing out degrees of flaps and limiting the bank to 15 degrees so it doesn't stall is very painful. But, for the pilots, it is a lot of fun. However the boomers hate you because the slow speed takes away a lot of the boom authority ... which is probably why you got b slapped. :D
You are right, FATboy, we weren't doing it properly. We were doing it like on a KC-135 which we saw 75% of the time. 45 degree vertical S Deltas and trying to see who got the PaChing' first! The Herk was a blast to AR from our seat as you did it all with rudder and 1010 degrees TIT. Speaking of slow, try refueling an HH-3 receiver single engine, 3-5 knots above airframe buffet!:eek: |
Originally Posted by Gearjerk
(Post 1108387)
Quick question:
Anyone know of a ski resort near SLC that offers decent airline/military rates? Looking to go over the New Year's Eve weekend, just tapping the knowledge of this board. :) GJ P.S. Be nice to find something ski-in/ski-out, or near a lift. thanks to all replies in advance. |
Originally Posted by Kingbird87
(Post 1108477)
You are right, FATboy, we weren't doing it properly. We were doing it like on a KC-135 which we saw 75% of the time. 45 degree vertical S Deltas and trying to see who got the PaChing' first! The Herk was a blast to AR from our seat as you did it all with rudder and 1010 degrees TIT. Speaking of slow, try refueling an HH-3 receiver single engine, 3-5 knots above airframe buffet!:eek: King; Try being the helo receiver on NVGs at 20% moon in a valley with fog at 200' on a mission in which, if you dont get the gas, very bad things happen. No pressure. Boom limits, pffft. Pavelows rule! |
Originally Posted by forgot to bid
(Post 1108162)
Man ATL's domestic terminals are a but of a joke, but D is a disaster.
|
Originally Posted by Kingbird87
(Post 1108477)
Speaking of slow, try refueling an HH-3 receiver single engine, 3-5 knots above airframe buffet!:eek:
A-10s sucked as well, especially if the TEN (the real 10) was heavy. We were limited to 540K GW when refueling A-10s, but it wasn't always the case when we're constantly sucking every other tanker dry before they head home for the day. Fun times (and long sorties). Cheers! |
| All times are GMT -8. The time now is 09:49 PM. |
Website Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands