Any "Latest & Greatest" about Delta?
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Jul 2010
Posts: 12,831
Likes: 172
From: window seat
Thank you, I'll be here all week, try the Biscoffs.
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Jul 2010
Posts: 12,831
Likes: 172
From: window seat
The 2012 flight plan sure has alot of building relationships with partners in it. The only thing that sounded like growth plans was building our brand and prescense in LA then it said we would do it in conjunction with Alaska and other partners. Looks to be a good year of growth for JV partners, Alaska, and DCI. The Delta brand is growing, but Delta sure isn't.
In the mean time the December seniority list puts us at 253 retirements in 2011 which is great. So far since the merger we are a pilot group that is 375 pilots synnergistic.
In the mean time the December seniority list puts us at 253 retirements in 2011 which is great. So far since the merger we are a pilot group that is 375 pilots synnergistic.
I actually believe that there's plenty of fault all the way around. Freddie and Fannie were/are corrupt, banks knowingly made loans to high risk clients, and the recession put many otherwise responsible homeowners out of work with no way to meet their mortgage obligations. Walking away from a commitment with the ability to still make payments is one thing, losing your job and income and having no way to pay yor mortgage is wholly different. I think we're seeing a combination of both.
Buzz, Phantom, you guys forgot about Barney Frank, and Chuck Schumer, who legislated that Fannie Mae & Freddie Mac MUST make those loans (to unqualified borrowers). Or, as Chuck Schumer put it so well "...otherwise, how will people who can't afford a home ever afford one...". There is the real 'poster child' candidates of the whole credit default swap debacle. Sure, Goldman Sachs has a great degree of culpability, but with those CDOs "selling at such a premium", they just couldn't help themselves. Plenty of greed to assign, all the way around...
Those settlements probably aren't what they appear to be for someone who hasn't dealt with the IRS.
A couple years ago my tax preparer didn't include one of my 1099s when he filed. I didn't notice it was missing either, since it was in the pile, just not on the form. IRS noticed it six months later, and the notice said I owed about $20,000.
They put every deduction/expense in dispute. I really owed about $100, plus a little penalty.Moral of the story, they send you a HUGE bill to get your attention. So when I settled for pennies on the dollar, I didn't get out of $19,850 in taxes, just fixed a small error. I suspect most of those "pennies on the dollar" stories are similar.
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Oct 2010
Posts: 922
Likes: 0
From: Decoupled
Banned
Joined: Jul 2010
Posts: 793
Likes: 0
Those settlements probably aren't what they appear to be for someone who hasn't dealt with the IRS.
A couple years ago my tax preparer didn't include one of my 1099s when he filed. I didn't notice it was missing either, since it was in the pile, just not on the form. IRS noticed it six months later, and the notice said I owed about $20,000.
They put every deduction/expense in dispute. I really owed about $100, plus a little penalty.
Moral of the story, they send you a HUGE bill to get your attention. So when I settled for pennies on the dollar, I didn't get out of $19,850 in taxes, just fixed a small error. I suspect most of those "pennies on the dollar" stories are similar.
A couple years ago my tax preparer didn't include one of my 1099s when he filed. I didn't notice it was missing either, since it was in the pile, just not on the form. IRS noticed it six months later, and the notice said I owed about $20,000.
They put every deduction/expense in dispute. I really owed about $100, plus a little penalty.Moral of the story, they send you a HUGE bill to get your attention. So when I settled for pennies on the dollar, I didn't get out of $19,850 in taxes, just fixed a small error. I suspect most of those "pennies on the dollar" stories are similar.
I actually believe that there's plenty of fault all the way around. Freddie and Fannie were/are corrupt, banks knowingly made loans to high risk clients, and the recession put many otherwise responsible homeowners out of work with no way to meet their mortgage obligations. Walking away from a commitment with the ability to still make payments is one thing, losing your job and income and having no way to pay yor mortgage is wholly different. I think we're seeing a combination of both.
Also, none of the financial and investment misjudgment you've stated caused home valuations to collapse. That was caused by people walking away from their contractual promises to pay those mortgages when home prices stopped doubling every two years. Mom and pop speculators were buying as many homes as their leverage would allow, betting that prices would continue to skyrocket. When the speculators walked away from their promises to pay, the bubble burst. Now we have websites devoted to teaching you how to walk away from a mortgage you can afford, but to free yourself from a home you've paid too much for. Its an outrageous example of what happens when too many of us lose our moral compass. And banks have noticed this missing moral compass. Thus loans have dried up. This should come as no surprise to anyone.
Carl
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post




