![]() |
Originally Posted by FedElta
(Post 1111458)
Along with most of my buddies, I was MD'd off the 73N on the last AE....difference is, I'm not even going to finish consolodation before going to 320 school....and I'll have 5 months left til mandatory retirement.
So, I write a long-winded letter to Crew Resources asking to stay in category my last few months, and offer to take the MD lower payrate. You guessed it, no way.....theyd rather lose the 73N money already spent on me, and never recoup the 320 bucks they're going to spend.......I am a unionist, and I support our PWA, but really ?...really ?:confused: Regards, BG I got your message. Thanks for the quick reply. We were at the Memphis Grizzlies game. I'll give you a call tomorrow. Thanks again |
Originally Posted by 80ktsClamp
(Post 1111494)
I believe it's known as "hue de feces"
Either way, go ACC! |
Originally Posted by forgot to bid
(Post 1111515)
That was a catch.
Michigan fans are the UGA fans of the north. :( |
Originally Posted by sailingfun
(Post 1111483)
You really don't want individual pilots cutting deals with the company. In the end everyone is better served if the contract is followed. What you essentially said was I would like to stay in my category and am willing to fly the aircraft for less then my fellow pilots. You are bidding your pay rate.
You also create a issue that you might be senior to other pilots in the category. Your could be taking flying that belongs to them. Someone might very well file a grievance and the company is sure to loose. Neither the company or ALPA want to go down this route. The company does have some contractual options to bypass pilots moving up with limited time left. I don't however believe any of those options apply to moving down. There were only 6 mandatory displacements off the 73N in the last bid. There were not a huge number of pilots involved. My hope remains that all DAL pilots will reclaim their position of respect and help restore our once proud profession . Best wishes on C2012, BG |
Kind of wonder if they are giving a gentle nudge towards retirement ... not that it is personal, when the junior guys were asking about leaves to avoid displacement the CPO stated an 12 to 18 month request would likely be accepted.
Furloughing has its own costs, but there is little doubt we are overstaffed right now. |
I'd wait for better conditions, but truthfully when you live here, you become a "snow snob."
Wasatch: Came up and skied Alta. Not too bad in the morning, but clouded up and got windy after lunch. Rented skis/poles at Canyon Skis south of the Radisson. The 'Techs' said it was a good thing I got the damage coverage. :D Lots of 'sticks and stones,' but it beat sitting in the hotel! Hope y'all get LOTS of snow soon! DFW |
Originally Posted by OccupyRestSeat
(Post 1109350)
What happened to individual responsibility? The "banks" didn't force jackasses to sign, did they?
Originally Posted by OccupyRestSeat
(Post 1109350)
You took out a loan you can't afford, you pay it back. I don't care if you have to pawn your Xbox 360, imitation Rolex, and your daughter's autographed Justin Beiber poster. Turn in your leased BMW and get a Kia. You signed, you pay. And the highly educated, trained and compensated 'experts' who are supposed to investigate and verify loan applications then approve said loans to people who, by long-held banking and loan practices can not reasonably be expected to re-pay those loans. If you give people money, under the above conditions...which did occur, it's called............... A GIFT. The banks, Fannie and Freddie Mae, etc... screwed up and should have paid the price, with NO bailout, IMMHO. (If you haven't already watched 'Too Big to Fail,' do watch. You'll get more than mad. :mad: ) |
Originally Posted by sailingfun
(Post 1111483)
You really don't want individual pilots cutting deals with the company. In the end everyone is better served if the contract is followed. What you essentially said was I would like to stay in my category and am willing to fly the aircraft for less then my fellow pilots. You are bidding your pay rate.
You also create a issue that you might be senior to other pilots in the category. Your could be taking flying that belongs to them. Someone might very well file a grievance and the company is sure to loose. Neither the company or ALPA want to go down this route. The company does have some contractual options to bypass pilots moving up with limited time left. I don't however believe any of those options apply to moving down. There were only 6 mandatory displacements off the 73N in the last bid. There were not a huge number of pilots involved. |
Originally Posted by Xray678
(Post 1111508)
where do you get this stuff? There is no plan to close the ATL 777 base.
|
Originally Posted by Xray678
(Post 1111508)
where do you get this stuff? There is no plan to close the ATL 777 base.
Hey, it's a Flight Attendant Rumor, which means it's true! :D All 777 flying will be moved to LAX and MCO. It's just that nobody in Marketing has dictated the closure to the Mushrooms in the Flight Ops. Dept... yet. The bid will be out in 4-6 weeks. Oh, and the 5 year plan changes every 3 weeks. SSDD :eek: |
| All times are GMT -8. The time now is 07:41 PM. |
Website Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands