![]() |
Originally Posted by hockeypilot44
(Post 1104054)
I agree with you. That is why I am still at Delta and have no application in at Southwest. I am still jealous of how much more my former colleagues are making than me.
|
Originally Posted by hockeypilot44
(Post 1104054)
I agree with you. That is why I am still at Delta and have no application in at Southwest. I am still jealous of how much more my former colleagues are making than me.
I suspect that we will top them in pay on the next contract (if we make it to section 6) and if we get a modification, it will happen during the agreement. Scope is number one, but a close second is pay, and we have to top them by a good margin for me to agree to anything. |
Originally Posted by tsquare
(Post 1104056)
What about your former colleagues that are at AMR, or LCC? This is really really sad.
|
Originally Posted by hockeypilot44
(Post 1104054)
I agree with you. That is why I am still at Delta and have no application in at Southwest. I am still jealous of how much more my former colleagues are making than me.
|
Originally Posted by hockeypilot44
(Post 1104059)
I don't have any former colleagues there. AMR hasn't hired since I was in high school, and no one I know is dumb enough to go to LCC.
My friends that went to AMR in 1997 are hoping to upgrade before they are 50. They left before they were 30. At LCC most of my friends are making 30 dollars an hr less than I am. |
Originally Posted by Clear Right
(Post 1104061)
I hope SWA pilots can stay at the top for all of us
|
Originally Posted by hockeypilot44
(Post 1104059)
I don't have any former colleagues there. AMR hasn't hired since I was in high school, and no one I know is dumb enough to go to LCC.
|
Originally Posted by hockeypilot44
(Post 1104059)
I don't have any former colleagues there. AMR hasn't hired since I was in high school, and no one I know is dumb enough to go to LCC.
|
Originally Posted by Clear Right
(Post 1104061)
My humble opinion, I wouldn't touch SWA. You think Big D stagnation is bad..? SWA is looking at years of stagnation and possibly pay cuts. They may keep their precious pay, but they will increase their CEO requested "efficiency," which means more productivity and less pilots. Just my opinion, but probably no movement there for a while. History always teaches us lessons, the one at the top with industry leading pay, never remains at the top. Just saying' be careful what you wish for. I hope SWA pilots can stay at the top for all of us, but I fear their cost creep will be taken advantage of by management.
She is barely able to hold a line out of OAK, much less hold a line out of any base. Funny how the grass is so greener if you don't actually take a good look... Don't forget the upgrade time due to retiments will put making captain around 15 years from now best case scenario. |
What's the deal with our block times lately? They all seem excessive - 2:41 BUF-ATL?? Flt plan was for 1:35 - got into ATL 40 minutes early. That's even after delaying departure 15 minutes, so we wouldn't show up too early. And me flying with a cost index of 0, mach .74. I was told the block times were driven by marketing - guess it makes our on-time stats look good, but we're ticking off the pax by sitting 20-30 minutes for a gate to open up.
Not just on that leg, but all of them on my last 4 day...routinely 15-30 minutes early everywhere. Dispatchers told me to ignore Attilla - don't get me started on that program - I'll never be convinced of its efficiencies or benefits, when we're the only ones playing. |
| All times are GMT -8. The time now is 05:16 AM. |
Website Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands