Airline Pilot Central Forums

Airline Pilot Central Forums (https://www.airlinepilotforums.com/)
-   Delta (https://www.airlinepilotforums.com/delta/)
-   -   Any "Latest & Greatest" about Delta? (https://www.airlinepilotforums.com/delta/36912-any-latest-greatest-about-delta.html)

iceman49 12-19-2011 05:39 PM


Originally Posted by acl65pilot (Post 1104438)
Never trust a program that tells you what it is saving you.

I had a good one last week. Attila told us to speed up by 18 mins. :eek:

AC, does anyone know what Atilla cost per year? If its only 10% of what FPS2 cost in inefficiencies...not good.:eek:

acl65pilot 12-19-2011 05:41 PM


Originally Posted by iceman49 (Post 1104447)
AC, does anyone know what Atilla cost per year? If its only 10% of what FPS2 cost in inefficiencies...not good.:eek:

I can guess based upon what I heard, but it really does not matter. We renewed it and get to experience it in all of our bases now.

Of course I make every attempt to speed up if it asks me to! :D

iceman49 12-19-2011 05:42 PM


Originally Posted by acl65pilot (Post 1104450)
I can guess based upon what I heard, but it really does not matter. We renewed it and get to experience it in all of our bases now.

Of course I make every attempt to speed up if it asks me to! :D

But not on a hard fly day:D

80ktsClamp 12-19-2011 05:44 PM


Originally Posted by hockeypilot44 (Post 1104408)
How does it seem like everyone on this board knows who I am, but I don't know who anyone is?

Speaking of, I had a hockeypilot44 sighting in ops on friday. :D

So, you've seen me too!

80ktsClamp 12-19-2011 05:47 PM


Originally Posted by acl65pilot (Post 1104450)
I can guess based upon what I heard, but it really does not matter. We renewed it and get to experience it in all of our bases now.

Of course I make every attempt to speed up if it asks me to! :D

I've heard that it was renewed despite desires to get rid of it.

Someone's desk justification on horribly false "savings" numbers.

acl65pilot 12-19-2011 05:56 PM


Originally Posted by 80ktsClamp (Post 1104459)
I've heard that it was renewed despite desires to get rid of it.

Someone's desk justification on horribly false "savings" numbers.

Yes, I was told it was renewed......

DAL 88 Driver 12-19-2011 05:58 PM


Originally Posted by OccupyRestSeat (Post 1104388)
"Almost every attorney" said we had no case regarding RAH, when the spirit of our contract was certainly violated via the exploitation of a loophole.

You may have faith in our contract, lawyers, and DALPA's spine, but based on precedent, I do not.

See also "Delta Connection" paint discussion in a parallel thread.

This is one of the big problems I see with ALPA. We get our EF&A from ALPA National resources. We get our legal advice from ALPA National. There's just too much possibility that the info/advice/legal language we get is influenced by ALPA National's responsibility to represent ALL of its member pilots, many of whom have interests that are diametrically opposed to ours.

And then we have examples like the RAH thing and the Delta Connection paint thing. Symptoms of a problem that I don't see how one can deny.

acl65pilot 12-19-2011 06:02 PM


Originally Posted by DAL 88 Driver (Post 1104475)
This is one of the big problems I see with ALPA. We get our EF&A from ALPA National resources. We get our legal advice from ALPA National. There's just too much possibility that the info/advice/legal language we get is influenced by ALPA National's responsibility to represent ALL of its member pilots, many of whom have interests that are diametrically opposed to ours.

And then we have examples like the RAH thing and the Delta Connection paint thing. Symptoms of a problem that I don't see how one can deny.

You would have to do ALPA work and deal with these people to understand that what you are accusing these people of is totally baseless and false. They do not sit there and tell us that we need to sell scope, and all of this other crud. They give legal advice, and advise us or the ramifications of actions. Legal ramifications, and what precedence is. They do not tell is that we would hurt X or Y. We then tell them what they are going to do, and they do their job, which is to minimize our legal risk as much as possible.

Carl Spackler 12-19-2011 06:07 PM


Originally Posted by shiznit (Post 1104039)
Seriously Carl, EVERYONE here wants much tighter scope, and is willing to go to the mat for it.

That is seriously NOT the case shiznit. Our own union isn't even willing to say that. I appreciate the fact that it's your opinion, but it's just your opinion.


Originally Posted by shiznit (Post 1104039)
The REALITY is that NO ONE, and I mean NO ONE, has the ability to negotiate Scope and "permitted flying" except the pilots of Delta Air Lines.

If that was the case, there would have been no need for the addition to the policy manual that I posted previously. When it comes to our scope section, other bodies are part of our negotiations process. Period.


Originally Posted by shiznit (Post 1104039)
You have still yet to convince me how ALPA has benefitted from more RJ flying at Delta

I've never tried to convince you of that because I'm not asserting that. ALPA doesn't benefit from more RJ flying at Delta. ALPA benefits by representing all sides, collecting dues from all sides, and letting the chips fall where the marketplace decides.


Originally Posted by shiznit (Post 1104039)
So tell me again how ALPA has been helped by poor mainline scope?

See above.


Originally Posted by shiznit (Post 1104039)
How have DCI ALPA pilots benefitted from this "secret language"?

This is what makes you unconviceable shiz, you don't even read what I've written. It's not the language that is secret! It's the meetings themselves that are secret. We will not be allowed to see the transcripts of anything said in those meetings or Moak's influence on the process.

Carl

Carl Spackler 12-19-2011 06:15 PM


Originally Posted by Rather B Fishin (Post 1104044)
Oh great wise and all knowing, where were your posts foretelling of the great LGA RJ infestation???????

No such posts directly. Only that I never wrote a single post asking anyone to participate in the call to action on this issue, and my numerous other posts about understanding that our management and our union both agree that we get flying only as a last resort. Only after DCI is maxed out, and JV's are imbalanced to their max. This is just another example of why I mistrust my own union immediately, until all the facts show otherwise. Too bad it has to be that way, but it is.

Carl


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 05:16 AM.


Website Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands