![]() |
Originally Posted by acl65pilot
(Post 1104438)
Never trust a program that tells you what it is saving you.
I had a good one last week. Attila told us to speed up by 18 mins. :eek: |
Originally Posted by iceman49
(Post 1104447)
AC, does anyone know what Atilla cost per year? If its only 10% of what FPS2 cost in inefficiencies...not good.:eek:
Of course I make every attempt to speed up if it asks me to! :D |
Originally Posted by acl65pilot
(Post 1104450)
I can guess based upon what I heard, but it really does not matter. We renewed it and get to experience it in all of our bases now.
Of course I make every attempt to speed up if it asks me to! :D |
Originally Posted by hockeypilot44
(Post 1104408)
How does it seem like everyone on this board knows who I am, but I don't know who anyone is?
So, you've seen me too! |
Originally Posted by acl65pilot
(Post 1104450)
I can guess based upon what I heard, but it really does not matter. We renewed it and get to experience it in all of our bases now.
Of course I make every attempt to speed up if it asks me to! :D Someone's desk justification on horribly false "savings" numbers. |
Originally Posted by 80ktsClamp
(Post 1104459)
I've heard that it was renewed despite desires to get rid of it.
Someone's desk justification on horribly false "savings" numbers. |
Originally Posted by OccupyRestSeat
(Post 1104388)
"Almost every attorney" said we had no case regarding RAH, when the spirit of our contract was certainly violated via the exploitation of a loophole.
You may have faith in our contract, lawyers, and DALPA's spine, but based on precedent, I do not. See also "Delta Connection" paint discussion in a parallel thread. And then we have examples like the RAH thing and the Delta Connection paint thing. Symptoms of a problem that I don't see how one can deny. |
Originally Posted by DAL 88 Driver
(Post 1104475)
This is one of the big problems I see with ALPA. We get our EF&A from ALPA National resources. We get our legal advice from ALPA National. There's just too much possibility that the info/advice/legal language we get is influenced by ALPA National's responsibility to represent ALL of its member pilots, many of whom have interests that are diametrically opposed to ours.
And then we have examples like the RAH thing and the Delta Connection paint thing. Symptoms of a problem that I don't see how one can deny. |
Originally Posted by shiznit
(Post 1104039)
Seriously Carl, EVERYONE here wants much tighter scope, and is willing to go to the mat for it.
Originally Posted by shiznit
(Post 1104039)
The REALITY is that NO ONE, and I mean NO ONE, has the ability to negotiate Scope and "permitted flying" except the pilots of Delta Air Lines.
Originally Posted by shiznit
(Post 1104039)
You have still yet to convince me how ALPA has benefitted from more RJ flying at Delta
Originally Posted by shiznit
(Post 1104039)
So tell me again how ALPA has been helped by poor mainline scope?
Originally Posted by shiznit
(Post 1104039)
How have DCI ALPA pilots benefitted from this "secret language"?
Carl |
Originally Posted by Rather B Fishin
(Post 1104044)
Oh great wise and all knowing, where were your posts foretelling of the great LGA RJ infestation???????
Carl |
| All times are GMT -8. The time now is 05:16 AM. |
Website Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands