![]() |
Originally Posted by orvil
(Post 1128946)
You need to chill out man. Carl's senior to you until he decides he's not.
I'd tell Carl to plan on not seeing his pension. That means he needs to stick around for as long as he can. If he does see it, then he's beaten the odds. At the very least, he needs to stick around for the medical, such as it is. It's just good planning. It's nothing personal. You are right, you will never make 747 Captain. DAL will have codeshared them away long before you are senior enough. You will stroke out long before that worrying about things that you cannot change. |
Originally Posted by Flamer
(Post 1128929)
I seriously have no idea how you make it to work each day without voluntarily swerving into a bridge abutment.
|
Originally Posted by Elvis90
(Post 1128968)
It'll shake your heart as it passes by. Four F101-GE102 low bypass afterburning turbofan engines...fuel flow about 285,000 pph on takeoff. Definitely not designed for fuel efficiency. |
Originally Posted by The Cavalier
(Post 1128943)
Which begs the question of why a DAL pilot commutes on DCI flights as S3C given that we own all the seats, name, and a good number of the aircraft.
|
Originally Posted by Columbia
(Post 1128977)
Carter's abortion (actually Carter should have been aborted too).
|
Originally Posted by Columbia
(Post 1128977)
Carter's abortion (actually Carter should have been aborted too).
You'll note that in the Air Forces current downsizing plan, no bombers are being cut. Air Force leaders chart service changes |
Originally Posted by Boomer
(Post 1128978)
If the Delta pilots think that nonrevving on DCI is unfair, and the DCI pilots think that nonrevving on DCI is unfair, then maybe it is fair and what we really need is more open seats. :confused:
|
Originally Posted by Elvis90
(Post 1128981)
Carter cancelled the program...Reagan resurrected it as part of strengthening the military (remember the failed "Desert One" mission to free hostages in Iran). It's a mature system now, and has been used sucessfully in every US conflict since 1997.
The B1B has been adapted to fight in ways not envisioned by its creators. If this aircraft had stuck to its original mission profile (high altitude bombing over the Soviet Union) it would have been target practice for trailer dwelling missile swine. IMHO Carter was a submariner and stealth resonated with his ideas about war fighting. BTW, what have those guys got against the great State of Nevada? Those landings are uglier than my attempts to land an MD88 in a crosswind. |
a voice of sanity and reason ^
|
Originally Posted by Boomer
(Post 1128862)
In two years I've gone from seniority number 9xx to number 5xx and I'm closer to the bottom now than I was six years ago.
This sure isn't working out. I'm not trying to be mean but you need a kick in the a$$. Move on already. Damn. |
| All times are GMT -8. The time now is 11:30 AM. |
Website Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands