Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Major > Delta
Any "Latest & Greatest" about Delta? >

Any "Latest & Greatest" about Delta?

Search

Notices

Any "Latest & Greatest" about Delta?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 02-12-2012 | 05:39 AM
  #88711  
CVG767A's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 1,190
Likes: 0
From: 767ER capt
Default

Originally Posted by More Bacon
By the same token, a commuter's QOL should not be boosted at the expense of an in-base guy's QOL, should it?

Frankly, I am a little tired of the entitled attitude seen above. The world does not revolve around you just because you are commuting. And it shouldn't.
Delta management realizes that it's in their best interest to facilitate easier commuting. The alternative would be paying relocation expenses-- something they surely want to minimize.

A decent commuting policy has a small cost, in the form of the occasional positive space pass. Building commutable trip, however, is a no cost item.
Old 02-12-2012 | 05:56 AM
  #88712  
Moderator
 
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 7,263
Likes: 105
From: DAL 330
Default

Originally Posted by Check Essential

Hmmm...
Have the bean counters finally found a way to "shrink to profitability"?
It never worked in the past but it appears to be working now.


Are we shrinking? I know for a fact that the pilot group is shrinking - has been for years, but is the Delta network shrinking? Do passengers buying a DAL ticket have less options?

When you include outsourced flying I am not sure that DAL is shrinking. Lets see who else flies DAL passengers:

DCI - 9 or 10 carriers decided on lowest cost.
Alaska - Tons of passengers via domestic code-share.
Joint Ventures - Can't keep track - but I am told they are good for DAL Pilots.
Sky Team - Who the hell isn't in Sky team these days.

So although we, meaning Delta Air Lines are probably shrinking at a good clip - the Delta Network is definitely not shrinking.

So I don't think the "You can not shrink to profitability" mantra applies anymore - it is pretty much an obsolete way of thinking.

Scoop
Old 02-12-2012 | 06:18 AM
  #88713  
Banned
 
Joined: Jul 2010
Posts: 793
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by Scoop

I don't think this will hose the junior guys over - but I really don't know how it will play out. But, and its big but, (no pun intended ) if it does harm the junior guys I am all for fixing it.

Scoop

Good to hear, Scoop. Which has me thinking...not enough side/under/over/anyboob on here lately.

Old 02-12-2012 | 06:29 AM
  #88714  
acl65pilot's Avatar
Happy to be here
 
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 18,563
Likes: 0
From: A-320A
Default

Originally Posted by Bucking Bar
Sort of ... .
  • Legacy carriers and Southwest have shown remarkable capacity discipline. This has driven prices up. It is a temporary gain to be sure. Nature abhors a vacuum and carriers like Spirit will grow to fill it as quickly as they can. Our action (including AA and United) might even save Virgin America.
  • We don't own the RJ's. As capacity has shrunk it has forced Delta's partners into losses. The 50 seaters can not be re-deployed outside a network and remain profitable. They have to come up with a "plan B."
  • Plan B is probably going to be high performance turboprops, which are not currently constrained by our scope. Bombardier will gladly resupply the market. The Q-400 has great operating numbers, but allegedly passengers don't like it. It's other problem is it's 737-800 sized footprint which makes it a bit of an elephant at a ramp developed for 50 seat RJ's. (ALPA is aware and I expect turboprop scope to be a part of C2012)
We need a competitive small jet that we fly.

The profit is also being helped out in a big way by all of the fees that we are charging for everything. They are not taxed and go right to the bottom line. Shrinking my not be making the money, but the way the price structure of the services is now being used.
Old 02-12-2012 | 07:16 AM
  #88715  
FrankCobretti's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 472
Likes: 0
From: Top
Default

Originally Posted by Bucking Bar
Plan B is probably going to be high performance turboprops, which are not currently constrained by our scope. Bombardier will gladly resupply the market. The Q-400 has great operating numbers, but allegedly passengers don't like it. It's other problem is it's 737-800 sized footprint which makes it a bit of an elephant at a ramp developed for 50 seat RJ's. (ALPA is aware and I expect turboprop scope to be a part of C2012)
We need a competitive small jet that we fly.
I have years and years of Herc flying in my log book. I have no problem flying a turboprop.

Props, RJs, Delta Private Jets: If it says Delta on the side, a Delta pilot should fly it.
Old 02-12-2012 | 07:28 AM
  #88716  
exeagle's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 154
Likes: 0
From: DL
Default

Originally Posted by Bucking Bar
Sort of ... .
  • Legacy carriers and Southwest have shown remarkable capacity discipline. This has driven prices up. It is a temporary gain to be sure. Nature abhors a vacuum and carriers like Spirit will grow to fill it as quickly as they can. Our action (including AA and United) might even save Virgin America.
  • We don't own the RJ's. As capacity has shrunk it has forced Delta's partners into losses. The 50 seaters can not be re-deployed outside a network and remain profitable. They have to come up with a "plan B."
  • Plan B is probably going to be high performance turboprops, which are not currently constrained by our scope. Bombardier will gladly resupply the market. The Q-400 has great operating numbers, but allegedly passengers don't like it. It's other problem is it's 737-800 sized footprint which makes it a bit of an elephant at a ramp developed for 50 seat RJ's. (ALPA is aware and I expect turboprop scope to be a part of C2012)
We need a competitive small jet that we fly.
Turboprop scope is something that absolutely needs to be in the next contract. And, my ego has no qualms about flying a Q400.
Old 02-12-2012 | 07:53 AM
  #88717  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Jun 2009
Posts: 121
Likes: 0
Default

Commuting
As a commuter I am sick of the commuter/ non commuter threads. We are expanding into the busiest most delayed airspace in the world (NYC), with fewer seats (econ comfort) and with that expansion creating hundreds of new commuters. Get over it. If you are not a commuter as it has been said before its better if you understand the plight of commuters and help better commuters lives too here's why.
The easier it is too commute the less we (commuters) will require contractual protections for commuters and guess what that means more attention paid to pay rates, schedules etc. If we are over 50 percent of the pilots at delta we have a majority.

Everyone will be affected if we operate less reliably canceled flights, more reserves working, more reroutes etc.
This commuter/non-commuter debate is very similar to other fights we have had within our profession that have had adverse effects for EVERYONE. Age 65, RJs and now big RJs.
the more we work together, learn together and support ourselves together the better we will be.
Old 02-12-2012 | 07:59 AM
  #88718  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 581
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by CVG767A
A decent commuting policy has a small cost, in the form of the occasional positive space pass. Building commutable trip, however, is a no cost item.
I'll define a commutable trip as one with a mid-morning or later sign-in and a completion before the last flight of the night out...

There are early morning departures from most (if not all) pilot domiciles. Those trips need to be covered...

I live in base and don't particularly enjoy 0-dark-thirty sign-ins. If my seniority allows me to hold trips with more gentlemanly sign-ins (AKA: commuter friendly) I will bid them if I want to. (I suspect many pilots who live in base will do so as well.)

I'm not out to screw someone, but sign-in time is one of the parameters I evaluate when I look at bidding. I'm not going to bid "crappy" trips so the more junior commuters have an easier commute.

If a commuting pilot don't have the seniority to hold commutable trips, perhaps they should consider bidding a category that allows them that ability.
Old 02-12-2012 | 08:00 AM
  #88719  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 2,206
Likes: 0
From: DAL FO
Default

Originally Posted by ilinipilot
Commuting
As a commuter I am sick of the commuter/ non commuter threads. We are expanding into the busiest most delayed airspace in the world (NYC), with fewer seats (econ comfort) and with that expansion creating hundreds of new commuters. Get over it. If you are not a commuter as it has been said before its better if you understand the plight of commuters and help better commuters lives too here's why.
The easier it is too commute the less we (commuters) will require contractual protections for commuters and guess what that means more attention paid to pay rates, schedules etc. If we are over 50 percent of the pilots at delta we have a majority.

Everyone will be affected if we operate less reliably canceled flights, more reserves working, more reroutes etc.
This commuter/non-commuter debate is very similar to other fights we have had within our profession that have had adverse effects for EVERYONE. Age 65, RJs and now big RJs.
the more we work together, learn together and support ourselves together the better we will be.
Agreed. I commuted for 7 years and it sucks. I won't ever forget what it's like, even though I hope to never do it again.

*If we keep having negative bids, I may be commuting again anyways. It's been said before: If one of us has a problem, we should all have a problem. The "me, me" mentality is mutually destructive.
Old 02-12-2012 | 08:02 AM
  #88720  
:-)
 
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 7,339
Likes: 1
Default

My company, Pinnacle has major debt to Delta and is likely to declare bankruptcy in the coming months. We are starting to back out of the deal with United on the Q400's. After we declare, those Q400's will become Delta's property, it's anyone's guess what they do with them.
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
On Autopilot
Regional
22617
11-05-2021 07:03 AM
AeroCrewSolut
Delta
153
08-14-2018 12:18 PM
Bill Lumberg
Major
71
06-13-2012 08:36 AM
Quagmire
Major
253
04-16-2011 06:19 AM
JiffyLube
Major
12
03-07-2008 04:27 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices