Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Major > Delta
Any "Latest & Greatest" about Delta? >

Any "Latest & Greatest" about Delta?

Search

Notices

Any "Latest & Greatest" about Delta?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 02-08-2012 | 04:57 PM
  #88211  
Line Holder
 
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 868
Likes: 18
From: Starboard Side, weekends & holidays.
Default

Originally Posted by FrankCobretti
All I know is, I'm glad I didn't spring for those ANR headphones.

The Mad Dog is quiet, right? Right?
"What?!?! You'll have to speak up...err, in ALL CAPS... DC-9 ears, ya' know...". Sure it's quiet. Even my wife is quiet after 30% hearing loss!
Old 02-08-2012 | 05:18 PM
  #88212  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Jun 2009
Posts: 5,113
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by acl65pilot
...a displacement the month prior to openers does send a message, even if it is not intended.
I don't know what kind of message you think it sends, but to me it doesn't send the message that I need to be grateful, and settle for less. It sends the message that we're still in Section 66 proceedings... so it send the message that it will require that much more of an improvement to make me feel like I'm even.

Money doesn't buy hapiness, but it sure helps when you're unhappy.
Old 02-08-2012 | 05:22 PM
  #88213  
Gets Weekends Off
Liked
25M+ Airline Miles
Line Holder
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Jul 2010
Posts: 12,831
Likes: 172
From: window seat
Default

Originally Posted by acl65pilot
This being my third section 6, a displacement the month prior to openers does send a message, even if it is not intended.
Yep. That message would be our scope is insufficient at all levels. 255 DC-9-10 replacement jets flying around outside our list, AS pillaging anything that touches the west coast at will and DL well below the AF/KLM/AI balance with no end in sight plus all the future JV dangers like VA and the Chinese carriers.

I'm also noticing a pattern of volatility emerging from the semi-company quasi endorsed rumor mill. CP's, LCA's and other folks in high(er) places are running the gambit from "impending hiring and awesome early outs" to "endless stagnation and be greatful we aren't furloughing...yet" and back again. Not saying the ones spreading the rumors are "in on it" necessarily, but they are getting their info from somewhere and those sources only give them what they want to give them knowing full well it will "leak". PsyOps 101.

Get hopes up, smash them to the ground. Repeat until no one knows what's going on. Finally settle on bad news at the critical time and the sheep will beg you to settle for less just to get it over with and avoid "the worst case" end of the bell curve of possibilities.

Would it be premature to identify this as the U. and D. in FUD from the age old playbooks of failed management teams that consistently run great airlines into the ground?
Old 02-08-2012 | 05:27 PM
  #88214  
Banned
 
Joined: Jan 2012
Posts: 623
Likes: 0
From: DAL
Default

Originally Posted by forgot to bid
Im curious about how trip parking plays into it as well. Like selling your vacation I do think it's important to protect pilots from pilots.
Although I disagree wholeheartedly with trip parking--how would it affect manning?

Any shady "trip parking" takes place after the bid is awarded, and thus, should not affect manning. Or am I missing something?
Old 02-08-2012 | 05:32 PM
  #88215  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Jun 2009
Posts: 5,113
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by More Bacon
Although I disagree wholeheartedly with trip parking--how would it affect manning?

Any shady "trip parking" takes place after the bid is awarded, and thus, should not affect manning. Or am I missing something?
With trip parking, you can WS up to max pick-up THEN pick up something back from your "friend" from the swap board, up to FAR's.

If you pay close attention to reserve coverage in certain categories, it's pretty obvious that regular lineholders are doing the overwhelming majority of the uncovered flying. For flight-whaures, this is great news. From a staffing perspective, it's a disaster. Makes me sick.

Congrats on posting something without using the usual acronyms, btw.
Old 02-08-2012 | 05:32 PM
  #88216  
Carl Spackler's Avatar
Back on TDY
 
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 12,487
Likes: 0
From: 747-400 Captain
Default

Originally Posted by scambo1
Bar,
Pilots think our core business is safely transporting passengers. Management thinks our core business is selling tickets. They are investing in what they perceive our core business is.
Exactly correct.

Carl
Old 02-08-2012 | 05:33 PM
  #88217  
Gets Weekends Off
Liked
25M+ Airline Miles
Line Holder
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Jul 2010
Posts: 12,831
Likes: 172
From: window seat
Default

Originally Posted by More Bacon
Although I disagree wholeheartedly with trip parking--how would it affect manning?

Any shady "trip parking" takes place after the bid is awarded, and thus, should not affect manning. Or am I missing something?
Doesn't it allow guys to fly more than they otherwise could? And if so, doesn't that skew the numbers of required reserves and whatnot? It isn't the biggest factor in staffing but it impacts it to some degree. Not to mention its pretty shady. We have way too much to fight for than trying to preserve all the little micro empires like trip parking, LCA buddy bidding and the narcotic pursuit of touch drop vacations. That's a lot of fat concentrated in very, very few places. High cost : low benefit.
Old 02-08-2012 | 05:40 PM
  #88218  
Timbo's Avatar
Runs with scissors
 
Joined: Dec 2009
Posts: 7,847
Likes: 0
From: Going to hell in a bucket, but enjoying the ride .
Default

Originally Posted by More Bacon
Although I disagree wholeheartedly with trip parking--how would it affect manning?

Any shady "trip parking" takes place after the bid is awarded, and thus, should not affect manning. Or am I missing something?

Our manning formula includes a factor for increasing pilots in category based (in part) on how many greenslips are awarded in category.

So, if pilots can circumvent the monthly ALV + 15 line limit, by parking trips, to pick up more time, then un-parking their trip, resulting a line far above ALV + 15, well, that trip is no longer in Open Time, and doesn't need to be covered, by a reserve or by a Green Slip. Thus no increase in manning, in fact, a decrease is warrented, as even the reserves are not flying very much.

If every pilot is flying just 7.5 hours per month above ALV+15, that equates to about 1,200 less pilots needed to fly the schedule. If you are in the bottom 10% of your category, expect to be displaced to a lower paying category.

Or...just fly 75 in a higher paying category...the job you save could be your own.
Old 02-08-2012 | 05:42 PM
  #88219  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Jun 2009
Posts: 5,113
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by gloopy
We have way too much to fight for than trying to preserve all the little micro empires like trip parking, LCA buddy bidding and the narcotic pursuit of touch drop vacations. That's a lot of fat concentrated in very, very few places. High cost : low benefit.
A lot of the abuse could be fixed simply by eliminating the swap board. I know that statement fits into some people's plan like a cold, cold wind blowing through and wiping out the stuff they've gotten addicted to. But the reason we had to go to the board in the first place was that Sawp with the Pot had become completely useless due to the abuse of Reserves Required formulas by the company. So the unintended consequence of having a poor system to swap with open time, has been to allow pilots to fly much, much (much) more than max pick-up.

A good Swap with the Pot, with rational restrictions, would keep everyone honest at or below max pick-up, and wouldn't allow those that whaure for the flying to add insult to injury by trashing the staffing.

I know this very idea infuriates a bunch of people, but at some point in your career, you've got to look around, realize your friends are turning tricks, with white stuff on their nose, and you've got to wonder if it wouldn't be better if we could get our dignity (and our staffing) back.
Old 02-08-2012 | 05:43 PM
  #88220  
forgot to bid's Avatar
veut gagner à la loterie
 
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 23,286
Likes: 0
From: Light Chop
Default

Originally Posted by Bucking Bar
Again I ask: "What is our core business?" "Then why don't we invest in that?"
I had a comment that I thought complemented your question until I read scambo's post and was reminded of the reality...

Originally Posted by scambo1
Bar,
Pilots think our core business is safely transporting passengers. Management thinks our core business is selling tickets. They are investing in what they perceive our core business is.
... we're a ticket broker. We can offer service on Delta Air Lines, Delta Connection by any one of several lowest bid airlines, we also offer service on Alaska, and AF/KLM, and Skyteam. It can't be more obvious. We're stub hub. We don't own the stadiums, we just sell the tickets. As in delta.com > Delta Air Lines.

Originally Posted by gloopy
I'm also noticing a pattern of volatility emerging from the semi-company quasi endorsed rumor mill. CP's, LCA's and other folks in high(er) places are running the gambit from "impending hiring and awesome early outs" to "endless stagnation and be greatful we aren't furloughing...yet" and back again. Not saying the ones spreading the rumors are "in on it" necessarily, but they are getting their info from somewhere and those sources only give them what they want to give them knowing full well it will "leak". PsyOps 101.?
Intriguing post.

Now I must go google - counter psyops.

Originally Posted by gloopy
Doesn't it allow guys to fly more than they otherwise could? And if so, doesn't that skew the numbers of required reserves and whatnot? It isn't the biggest factor in staffing but it impacts it to some degree. Not to mention its pretty shady. We have way too much to fight for than trying to preserve all the little micro empires like trip parking, LCA buddy bidding and the narcotic pursuit of touch drop vacations. That's a lot of fat concentrated in very, very few places. High cost : low benefit.


That's not Bar btw because he wouldn't have been the catalyst behind himself being displaced. The reaction may be identical though, but it's not Bar.
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
On Autopilot
Regional
22617
11-05-2021 07:03 AM
AeroCrewSolut
Delta
153
08-14-2018 12:18 PM
Bill Lumberg
Major
71
06-13-2012 08:36 AM
Quagmire
Major
253
04-16-2011 06:19 AM
JiffyLube
Major
12
03-07-2008 04:27 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices