Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Major > Delta
Any "Latest & Greatest" about Delta? >

Any "Latest & Greatest" about Delta?

Search
Notices

Any "Latest & Greatest" about Delta?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 02-08-2012, 06:00 PM
  #88221  
Runs with scissors
 
Timbo's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Dec 2009
Position: Going to hell in a bucket, but enjoying the ride .
Posts: 7,728
Default

Originally Posted by More Bacon View Post
I guess the next question is...can DALPA do anything to "save us from ourselves" as FTB put it. even a simple memo explaining the calculus...

Sorry, sinkrate, had to work that acronym in somewhere.

According to one of the ATL Capt. LEC reps, there is a fix 'in the works'. He didn't say exactly what it was, or when it would take effect.
Timbo is offline  
Old 02-08-2012, 06:00 PM
  #88222  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jun 2009
Posts: 5,113
Default

Originally Posted by More Bacon View Post
I guess the next question is...can DALPA do anything to "save us from ourselves" as FTB put it. even a simple memo explaining the facts.

Sorry, sinkrate, had to work that acronym in somewhere.
It's cool. I guess the problem here is that pilots probably overwhelmingly say in their surveys that they want to retain the swap board. So the union has to be careful about to approach this: do they simply get us wha we want, or what we should want.

In this case, I think I agree with what you wrote. I think there are some issues where pilots vote in the original survey that deserve a debate. If the MEC Chairman was to put out a couple of topics that he thinks we're getting wrong, make a case, then resubmit a survey on those points to see if we agree, I think it would be time well spent. I think I'd like to see a couple more feedback loops in the survey process.

Would you be agreeable to something like that, or would you howl that your expectations are being managed?
Sink r8 is offline  
Old 02-08-2012, 06:07 PM
  #88223  
Runs with scissors
 
Timbo's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Dec 2009
Position: Going to hell in a bucket, but enjoying the ride .
Posts: 7,728
Default

Originally Posted by forgot to bid View Post
Wasn't there questions on the survey about returning to the bow wave system? I'm sure the company would balk at that but our staffing in every category would increase wouldn't it? It'd be a lot of movement, at least I think it would be.

I'm sure they'd give back scope before they'd allow manning to increase. Manning to increase. Manning. Sorry Tim, I don't mean to say Manning.

Manning! Ha Ha Ha! You beeeg funny boy! You so beeg!

I put it in my survey, but not sure how many others did. I guess we'll know when we see the opener.
Timbo is offline  
Old 02-08-2012, 06:10 PM
  #88224  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jun 2009
Posts: 5,113
Default

Originally Posted by Timbo View Post
I agee with your intent, to eliminate trip parking, but I use the Swap Board lots of times in a -legitimate- way. Usually, I use it to move a trip a day or two over, so I'll put up a same-trip swap, just a day or two different, because Mamma threw something at me last minute, after bids closed, and now I need a different day off.

In the 'before time', we could swap trips, same trip only, no time diff. on your line, pilot to pilot, but we first had to call the other pilot on the phone, get him to agree to it, then call crew scheds, they would swap the trips (same time only, not higer/lower time trips) and sometimes they would even call the other pilot to be sure it was legit.

So it was a huge PITA, but nobody was parking trips to get 110 hour lines.
There is no reason we couldn't have a single source for all open time, into which we could trade trips, as long as we respected max pick-up, if the Reserves Required were not manipulated as they once were. In that case, you could do everything you describe above. Throw in a decent interface, and you could pull trips from PBS that met certain parameters, and show what trips you might be willing to accept instead, and the pot could probably be used as giant, tarnsparent, trip exchange.

The reason guys want the sawp board, is because they didn't have a good means to effect an honest transaction, and can't trust Swap with the Pot (for good cause). If guys had an easy way to input trips they might be willing to give up, and what they would give them up for, it could match the guy looking to be on the other side of the trade. You wouldn't even have to look up the guy you need to trade with, or waste your time scanning through boards, only to find someone willing to give up a GEO for an ATH.

The current system for assigning/trading open time is archaic, hard to use, and detrimental to the pilot group. It needs to be gutted, then torched, the ashes need to be burried, and the ground it's in needs to be launched out of earth orbit.
Sink r8 is offline  
Old 02-08-2012, 06:13 PM
  #88225  
Banned
 
Joined APC: Jan 2012
Position: DAL
Posts: 623
Default

Originally Posted by Sink r8 View Post
I think there are some issues where pilots vote in the original survey that deserve a debate. If the MEC Chairman was to put out a couple of topics that he thinks we're getting wrong, make a case, then resubmit a survey on those points to see if we agree, I think it would be time well spent. I think I'd like to see a couple more feedback loops in the survey process.

Would you be agreeable to something like that, or would you howl that your expectations are being managed?
I generally agree with the concept of providing a feedback loop for our negotiators, and would be fine with some give-and-take to help them identify "what we think we want" and "what we really want."

However, that would have been something to lead-turn a year ago, not a few weeks prior to exchanging openers.

My perception is that our Section 6 preparation, at least from a communications standpoint, has been abysmal.
More Bacon is offline  
Old 02-08-2012, 06:16 PM
  #88226  
On Reserve
 
Elvis90's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jul 2008
Position: MSP7ERB
Posts: 1,886
Default

Originally Posted by Bucking Bar View Post
Today the Strategic Planning expert said we were overstaffed by 4% for summer flying. In reply to questions about picking up more time for better pay one of the Reps replied if we flew more, the conversation could turn to furloughs in this environment. ... Not that he was prognosticating furloughs, but the capacity pull downs seem to have no logical end in sight

I was thinking that getting widebodies out of the mod lines and eventually catching up with our half of the AF/FLM joint venture might turn things around. We are making money and getting metal, even if it is used Douglas jets no else on the planet wants. I expected a net neutral in 2012 with the first real positive bids coming near the fourth quarter.

Instead, it is looking like many of us are going back to career jeopardy performing experimental test flight & design work to finish the MD88's initial design phase through incident reports and NTSB recommendations ... and that we'll be grateful for that opportunity.
Well, 4% of 12,000 pilots is 480...I'm part of that. My understanding, however, is that a furlough of less than 2 years is not cost effective. On December 21, 2013, the new rest rules are in effect, and likewise significant retirements begin. If I were a strategic planner, furloughs would not make sense given those circumstances, but it does help dampen contract expectations.
Elvis90 is offline  
Old 02-08-2012, 06:19 PM
  #88227  
veut gagner à la loterie
 
forgot to bid's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Apr 2008
Position: Light Chop
Posts: 23,286
Default

Originally Posted by More Bacon View Post
I guess the next question is...can DALPA do anything to "save us from ourselves" as FTB put it. even a simple memo explaining the calculus...

Sorry, sinkrate, had to work that acronym in somewhere.
I don't know how selling your vacation started, but DALPA sure as heck doesn't allow it nor will they entertain it. Seemed to me, and correct me if I'm wrong, that DALPA is against it and what they're doing about it might be an LOA or C2012 thing. I don't know. I hope.

Now, to restate this for Dr. Buzz and my G's in LAX:


With so much drama in the L-A-X
It's kinda hard bein B-U-double-Z
But I somehow, some way
Keep coming up with funky *** ***** about Dems like every single day
May I, kick a little something for the G's (yeah)
And, make a few ends as I breeze through,
It's two in the mornin in the A-T-L but out here my party's still jumpin
Cause my momma ain't home
I got my b****** being displaced from planes wit livin rooms
And they ain't leavin because they got sometin better in da mornin
We got a pocket full of shizzles parkin us all away
They got them some fix to getin them paid
Now this types of **** happens every other day
When you got trip parkin hoes that say fool I gotta get mine
So lets turn off the lights and close the swap board
But (but what) we don't love them trip parkin hoes,
So we gonna smoke a ounce to this
We need to get the D-A to the L-P-A mackin this **** down
G's up, trip parkin hoes down, while you ************* bounce to this...


Makes sense to me.

Last edited by forgot to bid; 02-09-2012 at 04:07 AM.
forgot to bid is offline  
Old 02-08-2012, 06:21 PM
  #88228  
veut gagner à la loterie
 
forgot to bid's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Apr 2008
Position: Light Chop
Posts: 23,286
Default

Originally Posted by Timbo View Post
I agee with your intent, to eliminate trip parking, but I use the Swap Board lots of times in a -legitimate- way. Usually, I use it to move a trip a day or two over, so I'll put up a same-trip swap, just a day or two different, because Mamma threw something at me last minute, after bids closed, and now I need a different day off.

In the 'before time', we could swap trips, same trip only, no time diff. on your line, pilot to pilot, but we first had to call the other pilot on the phone, get him to agree to it, then call crew scheds, they would manually swap the trips (same time only, not higer/lower time trips) and sometimes they would even call the other pilot to be sure it was legit.

So it was a huge PITA, but nobody was parking trips to get 110 hour lines. Oh, and we had a monthly cap, anything above 75 or so, went into your bow wave for next month's bidding, or you could put it in your 'bank', to be taken out at your leisure.
If we went back to the bow wave, wouldn't we be understaffed?

If so, we'd all gain seniority, right? What's not to love.
forgot to bid is offline  
Old 02-08-2012, 06:24 PM
  #88229  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jul 2010
Position: 757/767
Posts: 193
Default

Originally Posted by forgot to bid View Post
If we went back to the bow wave, wouldn't we be understaffed?

If so, we'd all gain seniority, right? What's not to love.
I would love to have the bow wave put back. I'd much rather be making the same money flying less in a senior category then flying more in a junior category.
Thrust Normal is offline  
Old 02-08-2012, 06:25 PM
  #88230  
Gets Weekends Off
 
nwaf16dude's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jan 2008
Position: 737A
Posts: 1,890
Default

If you want to see something that will reduce reserve required numbers, go take a look at the last 4 days of trip coverage for ATL7ERB. Averaging about 80% white slips.
nwaf16dude is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
On Autopilot
Regional
22594
11-05-2021 07:03 AM
AeroCrewSolut
Delta
153
08-14-2018 12:18 PM
Bill Lumberg
Major
71
06-13-2012 08:36 AM
Quagmire
Major
253
04-16-2011 06:19 AM
JiffyLube
Major
12
03-07-2008 04:27 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices