![]() |
Originally Posted by PilotFrog
(Post 1141415)
There any talk about opening a 73 base in DTW?
|
Originally Posted by sailingfun
(Post 1141354)
Actually the 76 seat portion was really pre bankruptcy when John Malone now a DPA supporter allowed the gross weight increase that permitted the E170/175 at DCI. The jets were flying for DCI before we ever filed chapter 11. They had them configured with 70 seats but anyone with two touching brain cells knew that would not last. There was no way the judge was going to make the company fly the aircraft around with a bunch of empty space once we were in chapter 11.
We should scope airframes not seats. Let the company figure out how they want to configure the airframe to maximize revenue. If they want to try an cram 80 seats in a CRJ 50 let them have it. The CRJ 700 should be the largest airframe DCI can operate. The 170/175 should have been a mainline aircraft. |
Originally Posted by johnso29
(Post 1141418)
It's definitely been considered, but I don't know how high it sits WRT priority.
|
Originally Posted by contrails
(Post 1140853)
The airliners.net crowd is all excited about some big announcement supposedly related to employees and/or good for the stock price on Monday morning.
Dorky as they are sometimes, they generally are fairly accurate with this stuff. Guesses? junk! |
Originally Posted by 80ktsClamp
(Post 1141425)
I'd be willing to be we'll see a DTW 737 base within a year.
|
Originally Posted by sailingfun
(Post 1141432)
The DTW based is planned to open when the 737-900ER start to arrive. That way they don't have to displace or retrain anyone within the category.
|
Originally Posted by TANSTAAFL
(Post 1141420)
Disagree - scope seats and management will just have to decide what aircraft to economically use with those seats.
Concorde - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia |
Originally Posted by Phuz
(Post 1141448)
|
Originally Posted by sailingfun
(Post 1141354)
...We should scope airframes not seats. Let the company figure out how they want to configure the airframe to maximize revenue. If they want to try an cram 80 seats in a CRJ 50 let them have it. The CRJ 700 should be the largest airframe DCI can operate. The 170/175 should have been a mainline aircraft.
The new big turboprops currently entering production/planned will mount a credible challenge to our scope current limits on large aircraft (or lack thereof for props). In the recent past, DALPA had success in limiting a type that exceeded the MTOW limits in our PWA with great success even though the seats were very limited for that type. I'd suggest using a limit of highest certified max gross takeoff weight as the limit to prevent reopening scope talks every time a new aircraft type is introduced to the fleet. Otherwise it just leaves too much "temptation" to use scope as bargaining currency—spent to get something else—which is exactly how we got to where we are today. Cheers George |
Originally Posted by contrails
(Post 1140853)
The airliners.net crowd is all excited about some big announcement supposedly related to employees and/or good for the stock price on Monday morning.
Dorky as they are sometimes, they generally are fairly accurate with this stuff. Guesses? When I was in indoc they explained that some secret marketing plans had been leaked on airliners.net forums, probably by someone who wanted to be the smartest person in a room even though that doesn't exist and people are anonymous. Hence: CONTENT You must not copy, reproduce or forward any content from DeltaNet outside of Delta Air Lines, including posting on any personal or public Web pages, blogs, or social media sites, including, but not limited to Flyertalk, Facebook, or Twitter or Airliners.net or that stupid *** airlinepilotforums.com/major. By logging on to DeltaNet, you understand and agree that select content is available for authorized individuals through DeltaNet. Data that is not yet published in DeltaNet, or has not been authorized for remote access, will not be available when accessing DeltaNet remotely using Delta's Extranet. When attempting to access information that is not available from Delta’s Extranet, users will see one of two error messages: The irony, I copied that and may have embellished some parts. :D So to say the airliners.net crowd does indeed have insight is absolutely true. They also have a lot of idiots. But they do have insight. The question is, what if it's a head fake and the only thing that's going to happen Monday is a Q&A with someones boss? |
| All times are GMT -8. The time now is 09:44 PM. |
Website Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands