![]() |
Originally Posted by forgot to bid
(Post 1145123)
It's my right to own and be able to afford to fly a Baron 58.
Carl |
Originally Posted by TANSTAAFL
(Post 1145128)
Trumped by the right to work to 65.
Look at what has happened in Canada to whats coming our way. :mad: Carl |
Originally Posted by Carl Spackler
(Post 1145062)
Two things. First is the model, which is the SWAPA model. They are a far more functional union in many ways. They have a great relationship with management but ONLY because they've stood up to management everytime with the important issues like scope. That has earned them a level of mutual respect from management. You don't earn respect being a lapdog...even though management will be glad to describe you as a "new style of union leader" in the Wall Street Journal if needed to make you feel better about your surrender.
Second, the BIG difference with a non-ALPA union will be the lack of conflict regarding the regionals. We can unabashedly go after returning our flying to us without facing the certain lawsuits from the regionals for failing in the duty to fairly represent. This is a HUGE deal. The fact that DALPA and ALPA cannot print a single word about scope or a single word about spending negotiating capital to get our flying back should tell you everything you need to know. An in-house union would have no such restrictions. I know this makes me sound like a one note musician, but there is simply NOTHING more important than scope. And because ALPA represents both sides, they've self-muzzled themselves on this most important topic. Carl |
Originally Posted by Jesse
(Post 1145111)
I guess the emphasis about being on time is no longer of import. LOA says it's to be out NLT the last day of the prior bid period. Here we are about 3 days later and nada.
I've been asking the same thing, but does it really matter? If you're in the top 10% you've got the month off. |
Originally Posted by TheManager
(Post 1144910)
Yo, Shiz!
Hope you are not in ATL tonight and hope everyone else in the SE has survived intact. I'll get to the point. Southwest gets paid more than us. Lots more! Their medical kicks @ss. Their scope is pretty good to I hear.
Originally Posted by TheManager
(Post 1144910)
We are no longer in the enviable position we were with C2K. Lots of guys out on the line don't want to believe this and try and rationalize these facts away. One of the first steps in fixing this is recognizing the issue and embracing. When we all can get behind this truth, we can focus our energy and win.
Back to the discussion; yes, but I do not agree that "lots of guys out on the line don't believe..."
Originally Posted by TheManager
(Post 1144910)
We can't if guys keep falling for this:
Belief Disconfirmation Paradigm
There are few if any guys I fly with that have this mentality, most are acutely aware of how far we've fallen and how far the climb ahead still is. I don't believe it has to do with convincing the pilots of Delta.... It has to do with finding a way to convince DAL managment (within the confines of the RLA), and the NMB that what we are asking for is reasonable and should be given to the pilots. THAT is going to be the true challenge. |
Can someone give me the details on how to positive space on the front end?
Thanks Scoop |
Originally Posted by TenYearsGone
(Post 1145124)
http://i66.photobucket.com/albums/h2...o/IMG_9116.jpg
And now from my generous nature. I would like this watch for all my "Delta Brothers" as a good faith gift from Management. This beauty was developed for the Pan AM pilots in 1952. Pan Am management went directly to Rolex and requested them to build this GMT watch for their pilots.:) Imagine, what a great uniform piece this would be!!! TEN It doesn't keep time. Much better with a Omega or a Breitling. :D |
Originally Posted by Scoop
Can someone give me the details on how to positive space on the front end?
Thanks Scoop |
Originally Posted by shiznit
(Post 1145142)
I don't believe it has to do with convincing the pilots of Delta.... It has to do with finding a way to convince DAL managment (within the confines of the RLA), and the NMB that what we are asking for is reasonable and should be given to the pilots. THAT is going to be the true challenge.
Carl |
Originally Posted by acl65pilot
(Post 1145145)
It doesn't keep time. Much better with a Omega or a Breitling. :D
Breitling=JUNK!-->ETA movement-->ETA is a product of SWATCH. As a Breitling owner, I can attest. Actually, sorry to offend any Breitling owners (I am one), this watch is just eye candy. The innards are made by SWATCH!!! OMEGA= NICE, but will not hold value. Rolex= In-house movement. Holds Value. As long as you are +6/-4 per day, you have a certified COSC watch!!! Worth its weight in gold. Although there are a lot of knock offs. Accuracy is excellent as long as you get it regulated every 5-7 years. TEN, self appointed APC watch expert:D **I hope Carl's was a genuine GMT |
| All times are GMT -8. The time now is 11:35 AM. |
Website Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands