Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Major > Delta
Any "Latest & Greatest" about Delta? >

Any "Latest & Greatest" about Delta?

Search

Notices

Any "Latest & Greatest" about Delta?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 03-02-2012 | 08:19 AM
  #91221  
Carl Spackler's Avatar
Back on TDY
 
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 12,487
Likes: 0
From: 747-400 Captain
Default

Originally Posted by Carl Spackler
you cannot defend a position whereby you want pay that is NOT based upon your productivity to the company. Ultimately, that argument is always a loser.
Originally Posted by tsquare
PLEASE.. explain this to me.. I still do not get it.
It cannot be denied that you and I do the exact same job. It also cannot be denied that when I fly for one hour, I do so with at least twice the passengers and cargo that you do. That produces at least twice the revenue to the company, but my pay rate is NOT twice that of yours. It's only marginally higher based on my increased production of revenue. IF we move away from the model of small marginal pay increases based on revenue production, then you are going back to the old argument that unions used to make. That argument was that we have to be paid simply by being on the property...not based on any work I actually do. That argument is one of the reasons the public soured on unions.

I'm just not sure we should ever go back to an era where we can be accused of that by our flying public. I think it's a loser for us if we try.

Carl
Old 03-02-2012 | 08:23 AM
  #91222  
Carl Spackler's Avatar
Back on TDY
 
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 12,487
Likes: 0
From: 747-400 Captain
Default

Originally Posted by tsquare
Yeah admittedly when someone quoted him and he was responding in a civil manner to my post.. I unignored him.. I know how to re do it though
The family is back together! '

Carl
Old 03-02-2012 | 08:27 AM
  #91223  
Carl Spackler's Avatar
Back on TDY
 
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 12,487
Likes: 0
From: 747-400 Captain
Default

Originally Posted by tsquare
Then compare that to Carl's contention that he should be highly compensated because the airplane -that management bought- that he is senior enough to fly.... should be paid more than other airplanes... based on some sort of productivity metric that has NOTHING to do with the job... It is a classic pull up the ladder I got mine argument. He's fighting for his seat on top of the throne, and I'm saying that his category is no more important than M88Driver's...
That's a terribly unfair characterization. I've never even intimated such a thing.

Carl
Old 03-02-2012 | 08:29 AM
  #91224  
Carl Spackler's Avatar
Back on TDY
 
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 12,487
Likes: 0
From: 747-400 Captain
Default

Originally Posted by Kingbird87
After skimming today's postings, I had a vision of Pete Sampras vs John McEnroe.
YOU CANNOT BE SERIOUS!!!

Carl
Old 03-02-2012 | 08:32 AM
  #91225  
tsquare's Avatar
No longer cares
 
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 12,109
Likes: 0
From: 767er Captain
Default

Originally Posted by Carl Spackler
No, I'm assuming just the opposite. My thesis is the replacement of one 747 with a bunch of narrow bodies. If management did that, it would greatly increase their costs. It's why management can't always give the added frequency that passengers prefer.
Ridiculous. What are we gonna do, relay passengers across the Atlantic and Pacific? Now serving London Heathrow hourly with only 4 stops???? Naaaaah you are making an argument that will have to be dealt with as a SCOPE issue.



Originally Posted by Carl Spackler
Our pay does have an affect on the bottom line...just not the huge impact that some on here state. Specifically, some folks here have stated that it was the C2K pilot pay rates that pushed Delta into bankruptcy. Absolute hogwash. Even if the decreased CASM is small for widebodies, it still incentivizes management to buy aircraft with the lowest CASM.
I agree.. and I don't care what airplane they buy because they are gonna buy what they are gonna buy. I want the most pay for the most Delta pilots over the course of their careers that we can possibly get. Not just the few guys that got hired when they were 27... You and Timbo have nowhere to go but down.. There are 11,500 of us that still have a long way to go, and probably 8-9000 that will never reach your Nirvana..



Originally Posted by Carl Spackler
I'm not holding on to that thinking at all. It's just a recitation of history. I'm only saying that I don't know if you've (or any of us have) thought out the ramifications of this.

Carl
I have absolutely thought this out. And I am still waiting for a logical justification for the productivity argument... When I hear one, I will shut up and bow to the whale and 777 as being the greatest things since sliced bread.

Sampras v McEnroe... I rather like McEnroe, but I think Sampras would take him

I am having a lot of fun with this discussion btw.
Old 03-02-2012 | 08:42 AM
  #91226  
tsquare's Avatar
No longer cares
 
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 12,109
Likes: 0
From: 767er Captain
Default

It cannot be denied that you and I do the exact same job. It also cannot be denied that when I fly for one hour, I do so with at least twice the passengers and cargo that you do. So what? That produces at least twice the revenue to the company, again, so what? but my pay rate is NOT twice that of yours.not really relevant, but it is disproportionally higher. It's only marginally higher based on my increased production of revenue. Nope.IF we move away from the model of small marginal pay increases based on revenue production, then you are going back to the old argument that unions used to make.Again with the productivity argument.. who cares??? and why????? That argument was that we have to be paid simply by being on the property...not based on any work I actually do.
Not exactly, but we are getting closer. My argument is that the airplane doesn't matter. You still have to push it around the sky... IOW you still do work. It is not like being on welfare. But OK, in the old days, a guy could bid reserve, go low yellow and not fly for months on end and get paid a lot of money. That is no longer the case for the most part, seasonal differences and economic problems notwithstanding.

That argument is one of the reasons the public soured on unions.

I don't care what the public thinks at this point in time. They are not paying what is in my honest opinion, a reasonable price to fly around the world in an airplane.


I'm just not sure we should ever go back to an era where we can be accused of that by our flying public. I think it's a loser for us if we try. Well that might... might be true, but then again, the public doesn't care, or even know for that matter that we took a 50% pay cut in bankruptcy TEN YEARS AGO and have still not recouped that... but that is a different discussion.

Carl
Old 03-02-2012 | 08:55 AM
  #91227  
Kingbird87's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 210
Likes: 0
From: A330B
Default

[
Sampras v McEnroe... I rather like McEnroe, but I think Sampras would take him

I am having a lot of fun with this discussion btw.[/QUOTE]

You both are doing fine, and so far the line judge is glad to see tennis and not roller derby!
Old 03-02-2012 | 09:03 AM
  #91228  
Gets Weekends Off
Liked
25M+ Airline Miles
Line Holder
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Jul 2010
Posts: 12,831
Likes: 172
From: window seat
Default

Originally Posted by forgot to bid
I will say, the 764 looks great but the main gear looks really small.
You know what they say. Small planes make your wheels look big.

Old 03-02-2012 | 09:04 AM
  #91229  
Elvis90's Avatar
On Reserve
 
Joined: Jul 2008
Posts: 1,886
Likes: 0
From: MSP7ERB
Default

Originally Posted by pilotc90a
This is the reason Delta doesn't have my home phone number, just my Cell, which is on the charger in the kitchen from release to report... They used to robocall me all the time, now I sleep right through it.
Same for me...I removed my home phone from my personal data after I began getting calls like that. Cell phone only now, thank you.
Old 03-02-2012 | 09:38 AM
  #91230  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Jul 2010
Posts: 432
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by Elvis90
Same for me...I removed my home phone from my personal data after I began getting calls like that. Cell phone only now, thank you.
It was my cell the called. I don't actually own a home phone. But I keep it on since I am on reserve
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
On Autopilot
Regional
22617
11-05-2021 07:03 AM
AeroCrewSolut
Delta
153
08-14-2018 12:18 PM
Bill Lumberg
Major
71
06-13-2012 08:36 AM
Quagmire
Major
253
04-16-2011 06:19 AM
JiffyLube
Major
12
03-07-2008 04:27 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices