![]() |
Originally Posted by hockeypilot44
(Post 1151424)
ALPA: We want industry leading wages.
Richard: I'm prepared to pay you industry standard wages. ALPA: That's what we're making now. Richard: Exactly. You know what, let's meet in the middle. How's a 5 percent raise per year sound? Hockey, You are being generous at 5%. The company can say - We agree with the Delta Pilots and concede to your opener. We will improve everything you mentioned proportional to a cost increase of .5%. We will magnanimously agree to improve every aspect of your contract to a cost level of + .5%, you DAL Pilots win. In other words - without numbers/percentages this is not really an opener. We are basically saying "We want more." http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HWa6vsXOKAU I like a lot of it in general - but it really does not mean much. Scoop |
Originally Posted by MoonShot
(Post 1151427)
How much more senior do you think the MSPM88B will get with the DC9 displacements? I know its my #1 choice if I get displaced (at a %).
Any MSPDC9B's care to share where they are going and where they sit seniority wise? 10,500 maybe? |
Why don't we go ahead and define what "significant" means when one says a "Significantly increase hourly rates of pay"?
And we all agree on it and that is therein what has been promised to us by ALPA. 65%? http://1.bp.blogspot.com/-cz7pKB8yJX...tuesday-41.jpg |
It's about what I expected for a "conceptual in nature" opener. I actually think it looks good as a concept, and could be awesome if the specific numbers are what the survey told them to go with. Everything in there that we have been compaining about is in there.
A couple of things that are not conceptual in nature that stood out to me were: 1. Having retired pilots between 60 and 65 pay the same as active pilots for health care....that would awesome and would create some movement. 2. Allowing a reserve to pick up extra on call days. 3. Moving benefits for a pilot who is awarded an AE to move to a pilot base. |
Whoops. I missed it.
|
Originally Posted by RockyBoy
(Post 1151441)
It's about what I expected for a "conceptual in nature" opener. I actually think it looks good as a concept, and could be awesome if the specific numbers are what the survey told them to go with. Everything in there that we have been compaining about is in there.
A couple of things that are not conceptual in nature that stood out to me were: 1. Having retired pilots between 60 and 65 pay the same as active pilots for health care....that would awesome and would create some movement. 2. Allowing a reserve to pick up extra on call days. 3. Moving benefits for a pilot who is awarded an AE to move to a pilot base. http://www.loupiote.com/photos_m/420...end-tunnel.jpg |
Originally Posted by Bill Lumberg
(Post 1151442)
Where are the duty rig and minimum day guarantees? I guess we like 3 days worth 11 hours? Already a no vote.
|
Originally Posted by Bill Lumberg
(Post 1151442)
Where are the duty rig and minimum day guarantees? I guess we like 3 days worth 11 hours? Already a no vote.
It's not that long, read the thing. |
Yeah, I missed it. Alright, I'll consider it.......
|
Originally Posted by Bill Lumberg
(Post 1151442)
Where are the duty rig and minimum day guarantees? I guess we like 3 days worth 11 hours? Already a no vote.
Scoop |
| All times are GMT -8. The time now is 04:12 AM. |
Website Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands