Bacon,

There is a list on the Treasurer's page of the average compensation per Alpa pilot. Go look at it. It's there and there was a link on the main page last week.

Yeah, I guess he gave 'exit polling' a whole new meaning.

Carl

BS acl. You and Johnso29 had your own little DPA bashfest based on one guys statement that you didn't even verify. You and Johnso29 bashed DPA for over 10 posts...and it was only a few pages back not 10 pages back.

Again, I should not have to tell you two this. Move the posts over to the other thread. You've done it many times before when it suited you, yet you refuse to do it now when you and Johnso29 were the instigators of the DPA bashing.

Pathetic.

Carl

Yes they are bacon. They are totally off the hook. They make the rules and they "revise" them as required. This ship has sailed.

Carl

It is blind allegiance acl, you just can't see it because, well...

It does not. Structured as I've stated earlier would be a dollar for dollar wash. Except ALL those dollars would come from union dues and NOT management.

Provably incorrect. The flight pay loss issue is just the latest example.

Carl

No Carl I read the article in question and the thread is ten pages back.

Again, it's this MAROW attitude of yours that gets in your way. I do NOT hate ALPA. I AM ashamed at some of the things ALPA has done recently. Specifically, trying to bust their own union of in-house clerical employees and the TWA lawsuit just to name a few.

What is my real agenda? It's exactly what I've specifically stated for these last years posting here. It is for my brother pilots to get the "other side" when I see pure BS being sent out. It is for my brother pilots to benefit from the mistakes my generation made by caving in to unwarranted fear. I want all Delta pilots to make their decisions based on their own logical minds...not scare tactics and self-serving statements from some in our current MEC administration. To the extent I can foster decisions based on logical minds by raising the BS flag when warranted, I do so.

Carl

Sorry Carl, but no forum rules were violated in our conversation. If you don't like the post, report it.

I would like to know the answer to this as well. Knowing how they vote will be very important in holding them accountable.

Accountability, namely (D)ALPA doing what they think is best and not what their constituents asked them to do, has been an ongoing problem for the better part of a decade now.

Certainly, asking the reps to individually talk about why they voted to outsource more career killing RJ's for example, not just parroting the talking points handed down to them by "leadership", is reasonable.

The DPA bashfest that you and Johnso29 engaged in started on page 9771 and went on to 9772. That's five pages back.

But that's not the point. The point is that you and Johnso29 engaged in a DPA bashing that you BOTH have admonished others for doing AND you moved the offending posts over to that thread. But you don't do that when you two are the offending parties. It's hypocritical and unprofessional.

Carl