Any "Latest & Greatest" about Delta?
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Jan 2011
Posts: 403
For Slowplay and Pineapple Guy...
Quote:
Originally Posted by Pineapple Guy:
"I am completely confident DALPA will not open the door further, and perhaps may even close it a bit."
Slowplay,
You posted this back in July last year, as many of us were trying to make the DPA/ALPA decision. Do you still have the same confidence that scope is not for sale?
Pineapple Guy,
Do you still have complete confidence that DALPA isn't about to release a TA with relaxation in ANY area of scope?
V/R,
FlyZ
Originally Posted by Pineapple Guy:
"I am completely confident DALPA will not open the door further, and perhaps may even close it a bit."
Slowplay,
You posted this back in July last year, as many of us were trying to make the DPA/ALPA decision. Do you still have the same confidence that scope is not for sale?
Pineapple Guy,
Do you still have complete confidence that DALPA isn't about to release a TA with relaxation in ANY area of scope?
V/R,
FlyZ
Last edited by FlyZ; 05-14-2012 at 06:08 PM.
This is all separate in my mind from the scope discussion. If the scope's not there, none of this matters. If they have in fact negotiated Section 1, and have not agreed to Section 3, then I'm optimistic that we will not be selling scope for payrates (multipliers). Time will tell.
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Mar 2008
Posts: 2,919
Sailing,
Why exactly would you post this? If the decision was made not to let us know what the survey results were, I'm sure it's not exactly cool for you to post that info on a public forum.....
Plus, why exactly would we open at what we wanted? Wouldn't a decent negotiator open at survey minimum plus XX%?
Why exactly would you post this? If the decision was made not to let us know what the survey results were, I'm sure it's not exactly cool for you to post that info on a public forum.....
Plus, why exactly would we open at what we wanted? Wouldn't a decent negotiator open at survey minimum plus XX%?
Thought we would compromise ourselves by divulging the survey results.
Sailing,
Not sure how you you came across this information, and why you would disclose it now?
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Apr 2009
Posts: 187
Sailing,
Why exactly would you post this? If the decision was made not to let us know what the survey results were, I'm sure it's not exactly cool for you to post that info on a public forum.....
Plus, why exactly would we open at what we wanted? Wouldn't a decent negotiator open at survey minimum plus XX%?
Why exactly would you post this? If the decision was made not to let us know what the survey results were, I'm sure it's not exactly cool for you to post that info on a public forum.....
Plus, why exactly would we open at what we wanted? Wouldn't a decent negotiator open at survey minimum plus XX%?
I agree though, he is basically going against what was said would be done. In essence using the "secret survey numbers" to lower expectations instead of letting us all see them early on which could have empowered us. ALPA loves to keep us in the dark, and make decisions for us. History repeats itself.
Lets at least hope some of the top ALPA guys manage to constructively engage themselves into better positions....politics, airline management consulting or management positions are waiting. Screw the rest of yall.
Moderator
Joined APC: Oct 2006
Position: B757/767
Posts: 13,088
But earlier leaks indicate we are selling work rules (giving the company more productivity which equals the need for less pilots going forward) for more pay. As you know, pay comes and goes, work rules rarely come back. Are you OK with worsening work rules as part of the package?
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Apr 2008
Position: DAL FO
Posts: 2,154
But earlier leaks indicate we are selling work rules (giving the company more productivity which equals the need for less pilots going forward) for more pay. As you know, pay comes and goes, work rules rarely come back. Are you OK with worsening work rules as part of the package?
Maybe.
I'll use another extreme example, but let's say they can work all reserves to 99 hours every month. In return for this abuse, we bring ALL outsourced flying home and get a 50% payraise.
Is the above a win for the pilot group as a whole? It depends. Bringing all flying in house would probably have enough of a net positive for guys to consider it a great success. Ice the cake with a little $ and now we're talking.
My example is ridiculous, but the point is: we all need to see the WHOLE deal before we start choosing what isn't acceptable.
We've all established many times that we have a price to be bought. Heck, for 100 Billion Dollars I'll have an RJ tattooed on my forehead. I absolutely have a price to outsource more of our jobs. Fortunately I'm 100% positive that management cannot afford to buy me off, let alone 11,999 of my fellow Delta pilots.
Serenity now. It appears that we'll have some better info to go on sooner than later.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post