Details on Delta TA
#1981
I've said repeatedly (and I think very clearly) that restoration should be our objective. Certainly, we should state it so that everyone concerned knows our intentions. But it doesn't mean we have to be unprofessional or amateurish about it.
Go back and read gloopy's post again. It is very consistent with what I have said in the past.
How much of the concessionary era do you attribute to the financial state of the company? How much is DALPA responsible for? Your post appears to lay a majority of the blame on DALPA giving up (paraphrasing). Is that an accurate depiction of your belief? I'm not trying to st you up; just trying to understand your perspective.
But that was all back in 2004. Delta emerged from bankruptcy in 2007 and has been leading the industry ever since. It's now 2014. Our company is making billions in profits and our industry has been restructured in a way that should facilitate more consistent profits and less extreme cycles going forward. And DALPA has acted this whole time like we never expect to return to anything even close to the standard of living our compensation provided for decades prior to 9/11.
I'm not breaking any new ground here, Oberon. I've said all this before... multiple times. For us to take the kind of extreme, draconian cuts we took. And then for DALPA to act like it's just the new deal and we don't expect to be restored and they even work to lower expectations in our pilot group. Well, sorry but I think that is unforgivable. It's a complete failure of representation. There's blame to go around, but at this point the lion's share of it goes to DALPA.
#1982
Straight QOL, homie
Joined APC: Feb 2012
Position: Record-Shattering Profit Facilitator
Posts: 4,202
They were negotiated away by giving back some QOL for reserve pilots the NC had already negotiated. Remember that?
So Dalpa expended negotiating capital to get CDOs. And expended it to have them removed. Buffoonery.
Doesn't inspire much confidence leading up to C15.
They had the "all the tools" they needed to succeed. So what happened?
#1983
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Jul 2007
Position: Left seat of a little plane
Posts: 2,399
No. Nice try. They were NOT simply "withdrawn."
They were negotiated away by giving back some QOL for reserve pilots the NC had already negotiated. Remember that?
So Dalpa expended negotiating capital to get CDOs. And expended it to have them removed. Buffoonery.
Doesn't inspire much confidence leading up to C15.
They had the "all the tools" they needed to succeed. So what happened?
They were negotiated away by giving back some QOL for reserve pilots the NC had already negotiated. Remember that?
So Dalpa expended negotiating capital to get CDOs. And expended it to have them removed. Buffoonery.
Doesn't inspire much confidence leading up to C15.
They had the "all the tools" they needed to succeed. So what happened?
While the entire CDO part was a mess, the end result was very good. "What happened" is that reserve long callout remained where it had been since C2K at 12 hours. "What happened" was that the ADG kicks in Nov 1, effective forever from that point forward, and it applies to reserves and dh-only duty periods, both a first.
When I got hired in the "good ol' days" of the late 90s, reserve was automatic short call at 0300 on your first on call day--without exception. Our equivalent of the Duty Period Average back then was called Variable Minimum (VM). The VM did not apply to reserves, and a 2-day trip that will now pay a minimum of 10.30 for reserves could pay as little as four back then.
We have made some significant improvements to the reserve pilot's work rules over the years. Many improvements (pay, scope and reroute come immediately to mind) remain to be secured, but while our list of improvements may not scream "stop the presses" to anyone, compounded on top of one another they have made this job a lot better since the worst of 2004-06.
#1984
No. Nice try. They were NOT simply "withdrawn."
They were negotiated away by giving back some QOL for reserve pilots the NC had already negotiated. Remember that?
So Dalpa expended negotiating capital to get CDOs. And expended it to have them removed. Buffoonery.
Doesn't inspire much confidence leading up to C15.
They had the "all the tools" they needed to succeed. So what happened?
They were negotiated away by giving back some QOL for reserve pilots the NC had already negotiated. Remember that?
So Dalpa expended negotiating capital to get CDOs. And expended it to have them removed. Buffoonery.
Doesn't inspire much confidence leading up to C15.
They had the "all the tools" they needed to succeed. So what happened?
It would have been better if both sides had been heard prior to negotiations but I don't know how the NC could have known CDOs were so polarizing. I'm guessing a lesson was learned. While the situation could have been handled better I disagree that giving up one hour of long call to drop CDOs was "buffoonery".
Why did you choose to use the word " buffoonery"? Do you believe our elected reps or negotiating committee is unintelligent?
#1985
#1986
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Feb 2008
Posts: 19,310
We asked the company for a 5:15 daily minimum. The company spent several weeks costing that out. They had to run mock bids for every month of the year after changing every rotation to try and see what the true costs would be. The cost was high. Some pilots who had flown CDO's wanted them back. If you can offer something the pilots want and the company finds attractive it can be used as a offset. It was a very small offset to the total costs.
#1987
So...how did we get "restoration" in our 2001 contract?
We had family awareness meetings where we talked about our losses, and what we needed to restore the profession.
The MEC rallied the troops, the MEC put out "Restoration" lapel pins, had meeting, talked openly about what we had lost in POS 96, and what we needed to "Restore the Profession" !
Remember?
Where is that kind of leadership from our MEC today?
Where are the Family Awareness meetings?
Where is the accounting for our financial input to Save Delta?
The MEC acts like the biggest pay cut, and retirement losses in the history of the Profession, never happened!!
The MEC won't even mention how much money we "GAVE" to Delta in 2004, and how much of their "BIllions" in earnings today is DIRECTLY attributable to OUR CONCESSIONS!! The ONLY reason we gave up 42% of our pay and our DB plan was to...
SAVE DELTA!!
Well...It WORKED!
WE SAVED DELTA!!
So, WHEN are WE going to be PAID BACK for our sacrifices??
WHEN??
We had family awareness meetings where we talked about our losses, and what we needed to restore the profession.
The MEC rallied the troops, the MEC put out "Restoration" lapel pins, had meeting, talked openly about what we had lost in POS 96, and what we needed to "Restore the Profession" !
Remember?
Where is that kind of leadership from our MEC today?
Where are the Family Awareness meetings?
Where is the accounting for our financial input to Save Delta?
The MEC acts like the biggest pay cut, and retirement losses in the history of the Profession, never happened!!
The MEC won't even mention how much money we "GAVE" to Delta in 2004, and how much of their "BIllions" in earnings today is DIRECTLY attributable to OUR CONCESSIONS!! The ONLY reason we gave up 42% of our pay and our DB plan was to...
SAVE DELTA!!
Well...It WORKED!
WE SAVED DELTA!!
So, WHEN are WE going to be PAID BACK for our sacrifices??
WHEN??
Great post, Timbo! Absolutely spot on.
He says...
Its all a big chess game about making your position look more "reasonable" while showing you can move to the middle a bit. Chest thumping from day one is an automatic loser. But there are ways to accomplish the same thing more effectively. Its all in the delivery.
DAL88Driver again
I've said repeatedly (and I think very clearly) that restoration should be our objective. Certainly, we should state it so that everyone concerned knows our intentions. But it doesn't mean we have to be unprofessional or amateurish about it.
On September 15 in response to tsquares question about your strategy you said this.
I have some ideas, but it would be foolish to post them here.
The message I get from you is that our reps are screwing up because they don't talk about restoration. Am I off base?
#1988
<<<<Quote:
I have some ideas, but it would be foolish to post them here.>>>>
But yet, some think that publishing survey results here is "unfoolish"? I think everyone thinks that for the most part that pilots "think like they do" and that there is going to be this unified support on every issue that they hold dear like "CDOs." (We can see from the DPA survey that they aren't that unpopular over there).
The perception now is a vast majority of pilots do not want CDOs (I certainly don't) but say the survey shows a majority of pilots actually want them? The company comes to the table demanding them.... Do you have more or less leverage with the company knowing exactly the percentage of pilots who want them?
To me it is exactly the same reason you wouldn't publish your complete strategy (assuming you were actually in a position to implement it and not just typing on a forum) until you were ready for action.
I have some ideas, but it would be foolish to post them here.>>>>
But yet, some think that publishing survey results here is "unfoolish"? I think everyone thinks that for the most part that pilots "think like they do" and that there is going to be this unified support on every issue that they hold dear like "CDOs." (We can see from the DPA survey that they aren't that unpopular over there).
The perception now is a vast majority of pilots do not want CDOs (I certainly don't) but say the survey shows a majority of pilots actually want them? The company comes to the table demanding them.... Do you have more or less leverage with the company knowing exactly the percentage of pilots who want them?
To me it is exactly the same reason you wouldn't publish your complete strategy (assuming you were actually in a position to implement it and not just typing on a forum) until you were ready for action.
#1989
We asked the company for a 5:15 daily minimum. The company spent several weeks costing that out. They had to run mock bids for every month of the year after changing every rotation to try and see what the true costs would be. The cost was high. Some pilots who had flown CDO's wanted them back. If you can offer something the pilots want and the company finds attractive it can be used as a offset. It was a very small offset to the total costs.
Makes sense. Thanks for that. My question remains, however -- Did we expend negotiating capital to put CDOs into the original deal?
From what you're saying, we did not. Am I understanding you correctly?
#1990
The perception now is a vast majority of pilots do not want CDOs (I certainly don't) but say the survey shows a majority of pilots actually want them? The company comes to the table demanding them.... Do you have more or less leverage with the company knowing exactly the percentage of pilots who want them?
To me it is exactly the same reason you wouldn't publish your complete strategy (assuming you were actually in a position to implement it and not just typing on a forum) until you were ready for action.
To me it is exactly the same reason you wouldn't publish your complete strategy (assuming you were actually in a position to implement it and not just typing on a forum) until you were ready for action.
A peek on the public survey that's going on indicates that 39% of those responding want CDOs. Not exactly a "vast majority." Hopefully, DALPA won't find that that's indicative of the pilot group as a whole!
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post