Details on Delta TA
#2811
Instead of finding ways to discount and destruct the path to restoration; find ways to achieve what we are "supposed" to be earning. Being Timid and passive is easier than being forward and challenging. IT is not going to be easy but with the right people, restoration plus inflation will be achievable.
I'm interested in identifying areas of leverage and figuring out what they might be worth. I want the most we can possibly get from C2015. If that number equals "restoration", that's great too. I'm not interested get your way. I'm just telling you you are heading in the wrong direction.
There will always be a reason not to pay us what we are worth..But that is just a tool used against us.
By the way, EBOLA is on the table now. DO you think we should furlough 500 guys and take a ten percent pay-cut to help out RA? I think we should do it so we can increase our advantage against AA/UA. It will also show Wallstreet we care for the company.
TEN
Continue on your agenda. Im done.
By the way, EBOLA is on the table now. DO you think we should furlough 500 guys and take a ten percent pay-cut to help out RA? I think we should do it so we can increase our advantage against AA/UA. It will also show Wallstreet we care for the company.
TEN
Continue on your agenda. Im done.
#2812
I'm interested in identifying areas of leverage and figuring out what they might be worth. I want the most we can possibly get from C2015. If that number equals "restoration", that's great too. I'm not interested get your way. I'm just telling you you are heading in the wrong direction.
Carl
#2813
That's not what APA proved Oberon. What APA proved is that the NMB won't release you if you demand full restoration on day one while your company is losing vast amounts of money. The strike option as the final tactic has to be in the forefront of everyone's mind all the way through negotiations. Spirit proved that.
Carl
Carl
#2814
Illegal job action? Are you serious? Are you just ignoring recent history or do you think getting sued and losing somehow helps negotiations?
#2815
Yes. But I can't speak for "the public" anymore than you can.
Which is exactly why I discussed the errors in reasonability made by APA.
Again...they are not arguments. Restoration is an objective and strikes are a tactic. When you don't pay attention, we talk past each other.
See above.
I'm not proposing talking about striking prior to opener exchange. I'm talking about preparing the pilots and their families for that possibility. Big difference.
Carl
Again...they are not arguments. Restoration is an objective and strikes are a tactic. When you don't pay attention, we talk past each other.
You don't think striking is on the forefront of everyone's mind? For our union to talk about striking before the openers have even been exchanged is telegraphing the NMB that we aren't interested in negotiating. When the NMB determines you aren't interested in negotiating you achieve nothing.
Carl
#2816
As you well know, that's a complete distortion of the prevailing argument. You do that quite often. I have to ask myself why. The clear answer is that you cannot possibly refute the argument, so you distort it. You know it's the one clear proven objective that will work, and since you're very afraid that it will work, you continuously distort the very meaning of the objective. You're so disingenuous in this regard that it's almost a waste of time responding to you.
What I've written is my opinion. You disagree? Tell me why.
That doesn't even make sense. Why would I be interested in minimizing pilot costs? I have to live with whatever we negotiate a lot longer than you do.
#2817
Gotta go now Oberon. You have the floor.
Carl
#2818
I'm not speaking for anyone, I'm giving my opinion. You can do the same. In your opinion, do you think the public will have sympathy for airline pilots who want to be "restored"?
Which is exactly why I discussed the errors in reasonability made by APA.
Okay. What other tactics can be used to get to 38%?
The condescension is unnecessary. You're an intellectual guy, you don't need to go there to argue.
How does one prepare pilots and their families for the possibility of a strike without talking about it?
I don't see any circumstances where we would be released within two years of the exchange of openers. It will be pretty evident early on if the company is trying to run out the clock. Lets say our union starts family strike prep six months in; is 18 months enough time to prepare pilots and families? I think it is.
I think you lose credibility if you start talking about striking this early.
Which is exactly why I discussed the errors in reasonability made by APA.
The condescension is unnecessary. You're an intellectual guy, you don't need to go there to argue.
I don't see any circumstances where we would be released within two years of the exchange of openers. It will be pretty evident early on if the company is trying to run out the clock. Lets say our union starts family strike prep six months in; is 18 months enough time to prepare pilots and families? I think it is.
I think you lose credibility if you start talking about striking this early.
#2819
Again, you're the only one talking about illegal job actions Oberon. Why do you bait people with things only you are saying? It's why you look weak and fearful. Debate openly and factually. Leave the straw men at home. Or continue to watch your credibility plummet.
Gotta go now Oberon. You have the floor.
Carl
Gotta go now Oberon. You have the floor.
Carl
If you aren't talking about an illegal job action will you give us a clue what you are talking about? Maybe I'm way off base but illegal job actions are the only thing I can think of that some think would give us leverage that couldn't be discussed here.
Have a good weekend...what's left of it.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post