Notices

Details on Delta TA

Old 04-02-2015 | 02:51 PM
  #3391  
Carl Spackler's Avatar
Back on TDY
 
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 12,487
Likes: 0
From: 747-400 Captain
Default

Originally Posted by DeadHead
Love these patronizing, condescending posts..... they never get old.
Indeed. Whether it's the old heads like Alfaromeo and Karnak, or their (wink wink) reincarnations like Bender and the Tool, the arrogance and narcissism always comes through. I guess that DALPA "special committee" has just got to stay busy somehow.

Carl
Reply
Old 04-02-2015 | 02:51 PM
  #3392  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Dec 2014
Posts: 1,184
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by Denny Crane
Profit sharing should have nothing to do with the pay rate negotiated. I view it as a "bonus" in the good times. Negotiate a great pay rate for the not so good times.

Denny
Exactly, oh wise one. We can talk about it, but only outside of section 6.
Reply
Old 04-02-2015 | 02:53 PM
  #3393  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Dec 2014
Posts: 1,184
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by Carl Spackler
Indeed. Whether it's the old heads like Alfaromeo and Karnak, or their (wink wink) reincarnations like Bender and the Tool, the arrogance and narcissism always comes through. I guess that DALPA "special committee" has just got to stay busy somehow.

Carl
You're the king of narcissism. Are you posting here on your other company's time?
Reply
Old 04-02-2015 | 02:59 PM
  #3394  
Banned
 
Joined: Oct 2013
Posts: 147
Likes: 0
Default

Denny,

No it wasn't compensation for past sacrifices. It was the best we could do for future compensation based on a very weak hand we were dealt post-bankruptcy. We would've opted for fixed pay increases if we would have had the negotiating leverage.

I understand you value the insurance as a "bonus". Nothing wrong with that. What that insurance is worth is the question. The value changes with the business cycle. Are you willing to pay the premium when risk changes? That is the question.

Profit sharing is a tool in which its value changes in the business cycle. We should look to monetize when its value is high and likely to be lower in the future. We can initiate it when its value is low and likely to increase in the future. It isn't good or bad. I'm saying I think it is a good time to capture value and reduce risk.
Reply
Old 04-02-2015 | 03:01 PM
  #3395  
Banned
 
Joined: Oct 2013
Posts: 147
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by Carl Spackler
Indeed. Whether it's the old heads like Alfaromeo and Karnak, or their (wink wink) reincarnations like Bender and the Tool, the arrogance and narcissism always comes through. I guess that DALPA "special committee" has just got to stay busy somehow.

Carl
Well now were cookin'. One of the original Poo Monkeys.
Reply
Old 04-02-2015 | 03:03 PM
  #3396  
Carl Spackler's Avatar
Back on TDY
 
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 12,487
Likes: 0
From: 747-400 Captain
Default

Originally Posted by BenderRodriguez
If our hourly rates appear to be less than AA's, meh.
There are no "appearances" in pay rates. They are either higher, lower or equal.

Originally Posted by BenderRodriguez
I'll take that nice pay bump in the first quarter of the year and get that 401k working faster, and perhaps a little less each month. Yup. TVM. It's real. But if the group wants to monetize it and smoke AA's hourly rates, I am fine with that too.
Twice in the same paragraph, you tie pay rates to profit sharing. The members don't want that. What you wrote below doesn't wash with what you wrote above.

Originally Posted by BenderRodriguez
But I do not think the PS should be monetized in section 6. Get our rates for the contract solidified, THEN come back and talk about PS.
Contradicting yourself in the same post doesn't help.

Carl
Reply
Old 04-02-2015 | 03:11 PM
  #3397  
Carl Spackler's Avatar
Back on TDY
 
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 12,487
Likes: 0
From: 747-400 Captain
Default

Originally Posted by BenderRodriguez
New hires are gonna retire rich unless they are complete driveling idiots when it comes to investing.
Nobody can make that claim. Successful investing over a lifetime is a very difficult thing. I know people who Wall Street would consider "unsophisticated" that did extremely well, and very well educated economists that lost their shirts. There are no guarantees in investing...I don't care who you are.

Carl
Reply
Old 04-02-2015 | 03:18 PM
  #3398  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Dec 2014
Posts: 1,184
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by Carl Spackler
There are no "appearances" in pay rates. They are either higher, lower or equal.



Twice in the same paragraph, you tie pay rates to profit sharing. The members don't want that. What you wrote below doesn't wash with what you wrote above.



Contradicting yourself in the same post doesn't help.

Carl
Carl, you're boring, tired and predictable. I have zero interest in debating you.
Reply
Old 04-02-2015 | 03:39 PM
  #3399  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Dec 2014
Posts: 1,184
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by SharpestTool
I'm saying I think it is a good time to capture value and reduce risk.
Do you think doing it inside section 6 is a wise move?
Reply
Old 04-02-2015 | 04:23 PM
  #3400  
Thread Starter
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Oct 2009
Posts: 3,108
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by SharpestTool
Denny,

No it wasn't compensation for past sacrifices. It was the best we could do for future compensation based on a very weak hand we were dealt post-bankruptcy. We would've opted for fixed pay increases if we would have had the negotiating leverage.

I understand you value the insurance as a "bonus". Nothing wrong with that. What that insurance is worth is the question. The value changes with the business cycle. Are you willing to pay the premium when risk changes? That is the question.

Profit sharing is a tool in which its value changes in the business cycle. We should look to monetize when its value is high and likely to be lower in the future. We can initiate it when its value is low and likely to increase in the future. It isn't good or bad. I'm saying I think it is a good time to capture value and reduce risk.
MD has said it over and over. "We hear you and you don't want to reduce or trade profit sharing".

The survey has spoken.

Maybe 2018.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Kilroy
ExpressJet
10796
01-11-2016 06:49 AM
FastDEW
Major
201
09-03-2011 06:42 AM
Quagmire
Major
253
04-16-2011 06:19 AM
ksatflyer
Hangar Talk
10
08-20-2008 09:14 PM
INAV8OR
Mergers and Acquisitions
66
05-15-2008 04:37 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Thread Tools
Search this Thread
Your Privacy Choices