Notices

Details on Delta TA

Old 06-09-2015 | 07:38 AM
  #6531  
Thread Starter
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Oct 2009
Posts: 3,108
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by GunshipGuy
Funding our pay rates with cuts to PS. Amazing.

I'm sorry, but my 16 yr old could have come back with a better TA.

Do you think the company's negotiators had a good laugh with the $0.05 per diem bump?
And how about that increase in international override? Amazing.
Reply
Old 06-09-2015 | 07:38 AM
  #6532  
Banned
 
Joined: Oct 2013
Posts: 147
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by Denny Crane
Are you really trying to tell us this TA does not contain concessions?

Don't **** down my back and tell me it's raining. This TA is chuck full of concessions.

Denny
As a whole the contract isn't concessionary.

A negotiation is called a negotiation. That means the needs of both sides have to be met, not just one. At the end, more money is coming into the hands of Delta pilots, not flowing from our pockets to the company.

This is an industry leading contract and richest in history.
Reply
Old 06-09-2015 | 07:39 AM
  #6533  
newKnow's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 6,844
Likes: 0
From: 765-A
Default

I see that they will pay the A350 the same as the B777....


....if anyone here is at the meeting, can you ask them if there is anything in the language that would prohibit the company from converting A350's to A330's?
Reply
Old 06-09-2015 | 07:41 AM
  #6534  
Thread Starter
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Oct 2009
Posts: 3,108
Likes: 0
Default

Times are so tough they can't match the American and United pilot's 16% DC until 2017.

You can't make this stuff up.
Reply
Old 06-09-2015 | 07:41 AM
  #6535  
newKnow's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 6,844
Likes: 0
From: 765-A
Default

Originally Posted by SharpestTool
As a whole the contract isn't concessionary.

A negotiation is called a negotiation. That means the needs of both sides have to be met, not just one. At the end, more money is coming into the hands of Delta pilots, not flowing from our pockets to the company.

This is an industry leading contract and richest in history.
So, what do you think will happen if the TA get's voted down?

Did you see my response to you? Ie. what the American flight attendants did?
Reply
Old 06-09-2015 | 07:41 AM
  #6536  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Apr 2013
Posts: 149
Likes: 0
From: A350 Captain (RET)
Default

Originally Posted by Herkflyr
Uh...senior widebody captains in their last five years happy about $300+K a year.

Think they care about stuff at the "lower" end of the contract? They don't.

I'm not happy about the magnitude of the PS change. Hopefully some tough questions will be asked today and tomorrow from the reps.

Herkflyr,

Sorry, but that is a bullcrap statement and I am a senior widebody captain (top 1 percent flying Delta's largest jet) with 4 more years until retirement.

I am truly disappointed in the bullet points of this TA and I would not be surprised if the MEC sends the negotiators back. I would also hope they send it back with a unanimous vote.

There are way too many givebacks in this proposed contract for me to be excited about including the F/O's being prevented from bidding LCA trips, Sick Leave verification, the lack of more vacation days and the relaxation of international scope....just to name a few.

We also agree about our Profit Sharing, I don't like the idea of our raise being funded by Profit Sharing but I caution you about lumping us senior guys in not wanting to fight the fight (I have walked a picket line before and can do it again).

Fly safe,

OC
Reply
Old 06-09-2015 | 07:46 AM
  #6537  
Thread Starter
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Oct 2009
Posts: 3,108
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by SharpestTool
As a whole the contract isn't concessionary.

A negotiation is called a negotiation. That means the needs of both sides have to be met, not just one. At the end, more money is coming into the hands of Delta pilots, not flowing from our pockets to the company.

This is an industry leading contract and richest in history.
How many Widebody pilot jobs did we give away changing to block hours? And what was the annual cost?

My math at least $40 million per year. 100 Widebody captains and 150 Widebody first officers. And the potential to get much worse over time.

What will the cost of changing the PTIX definition for profit sharing cost us? My math 1% of our w-2.

Self funding. Worse than C2012. Cost neutral.

To say POS is and insult to s###.
Reply
Old 06-09-2015 | 07:49 AM
  #6538  
roadrunner65's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Oct 2009
Posts: 106
Likes: 0
From: 330
Default

Riddled with concessions. Pay raises look ok until you net out PS loses and inflation. Epic failure. I voted yes on C2012, but won't even consider this one. NO!
Reply
Old 06-09-2015 | 07:50 AM
  #6539  
Timbo's Avatar
Runs with scissors
 
Joined: Dec 2009
Posts: 7,847
Likes: 0
From: Going to hell in a bucket, but enjoying the ride .
Default

Originally Posted by SharpestTool
Left early.

Anyone who cares to interpret and calculate the effect of new PS methodology as it would have applied for 2014, it would be greatly appreciated. I'm trying to do that now and it would be nice to compare with other sets of eyes.
Here's a quick WAG:

In C2012 we reduced the profit sharing formula from 15% to 10% of the profit up to $2.5 Billion, to self fund our crappy raises, but left the amount above $2.5 Billion alone, at 20%.

Now they are also going to reduce the amount of PS above $2.5 Billion to 10% instead of 20% to self fund these crappy raises. That is a 50% reduction!

If the company earns $6 Billion, that's a reduction from $700 Million (20% of the amount above $2.5 B) to half of that; or $350 Million. That is for all employees, the pilots get about 1/3 of that number, or $115 Million, instead of twice that, or $230 Million.

In 'real dollars' the number crunchers at the MEC have said that amount equals 5.75% in pay rates, which is why we get a 6% pay raise on Jan 1. It's a wash, not a 'raise'.

The two out years of 3% raises are a joke, just like 2012. Those both need to be at least 5%.

The 8% up front is a 'raise' but still 10% short of the raise required to bring us back to 2004 pay rates, which will finally be obtained...in 2018! 14 years and Billions in concessions after 2004.

So basically, what we are getting is an 8% raise, but only if we give up a lot of other concessions to 'pay' for it. JV concessions is one of the biggest concessions, but you never wanted to be a Wide Body Captain anyway, right?

You'll look sweet with that E195 retirement photo.
Reply
Old 06-09-2015 | 07:51 AM
  #6540  
DALFA's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Nov 2008
Posts: 1,508
Likes: 0
From: I'm here, i'm there, i'm everywhere...
Default

Current formula:

10% up to $2.5 billion
20% above $2.5 billion

This would equal $950 million in profit sharing at $6 billion in profits.

Proposed formula:

10% up to $6 billion
20% above $6 billion

This would equal $600 million in profit sharing at $6 billion in profits. That's up to a 37% cut in profit sharing assuming a profit of $6 billion. This years profit sharing pool was $1.1 billion and paid 16.58% of wages. With the new profit sharing formula the profit sharing would have been cut to $750 million meaning a payout of 11.3% (5.28% less).
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Kilroy
ExpressJet
10796
01-11-2016 06:49 AM
FastDEW
Major
201
09-03-2011 06:42 AM
Quagmire
Major
253
04-16-2011 06:19 AM
ksatflyer
Hangar Talk
10
08-20-2008 09:14 PM
INAV8OR
Mergers and Acquisitions
66
05-15-2008 04:37 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Thread Tools
Search this Thread
Your Privacy Choices