Search

Notices

Details on Delta TA

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 06-09-2015 | 06:06 PM
  #6901  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Feb 2014
Posts: 463
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by sailingfun
I was told the same thing by several reps. The new agreement preserves what we have and could end up better as we up guage the Atlantic flying and AF/KLM down guage as per their current fleet plans. I want to see the numbers to verify it but the reps seem to have no issue with this. They have issues in other areas but not this one.
If you haven't noticed, our union does not have a good track record of late regarding scope and scope enforcement. We are told "such and such gives us more ironclad scope language and the opportunity to grow our widebody flying in _____ theater". The results speak for themselves. The question is, how many times can you sell the same guy swamp land as the foundation for his new house?
Reply
Old 06-09-2015 | 06:08 PM
  #6902  
forgot to bid's Avatar
veut gagner à la loterie
 
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 23,286
Likes: 0
From: Light Chop
Default

If the E190s are growth, and we took all 739s, 717s, 52 E190s and kept 88s and parked the supposed 60 ish 752s (total and DCI went to 425.... I see a ratio of 2.1 to 2.2.

I only see 1.8 if you keep our current fleet and DCI goes to 425.

If that's right, why set baseline at status quo? Why not put up or shut up, if its growth make the min ratio match?
Reply
Old 06-09-2015 | 06:12 PM
  #6903  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 20,877
Likes: 194
Default

Originally Posted by forgot to bid
If the E190s are growth, and we took all 739s, 717s, 52 E190s and kept 88s and parked the supposed 60 ish 752s (total and DCI went to 425.... I see a ratio of 2.1 to 2.2.

I only see 1.8 if you keep our current fleet and DCI goes to 425.

If that's right, why set baseline at status quo? Why not put up or shut up, if its growth make the min ratio match?
The current status quo is 1.55.
Reply
Old 06-09-2015 | 06:12 PM
  #6904  
profit's Avatar
sharing
 
Joined: Dec 2012
Posts: 139
Likes: 0
Default

Why should an E195 pay so much less than a 717? Roughly the same size.
Reply
Old 06-09-2015 | 06:15 PM
  #6905  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 1,707
Likes: 0
From: Permanently scarred
Default

I'm convinced the supporters of this TA who are part of our pilot group are direct descendants of the French Vichy.
Reply
Old 06-09-2015 | 06:19 PM
  #6906  
On Reserve
 
Joined: Jun 2015
Posts: 22
Likes: 0
From: Bounty Hunter
Default

Are you kidding me. There is someone that supports this TA other than the alpa robots ? I don't believe it. Nobody in their right mind could support this TA. It's a NO !!!!!
Reply
Old 06-09-2015 | 06:22 PM
  #6907  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 328
Likes: 0
From: undefined
Default

Originally Posted by sailingfun
I was told the same thing by several reps. The new agreement preserves what we have and could end up better as we up gauge the Atlantic flying and AF/KLM down guage as per their current fleet plans. I want to see the numbers to verify it but the reps seem to have no issue with this. They have issues in other areas but not this one.
Do you really think AF is going to park A380's? I don't. The Euro Laws make it very hard to change block hours (jobs) so I really can't see them down gauging either. The weak Euro makes those routes less profitable for us, so I really don't see us up gauging, quite the opposite in fact. I don't want this part of the agreement to be one of those "we didn't expect them to do that...." when we are flying one A321, to their A380. But at least Delta keeps half the profit, right?

In fact, our BH is LIMITED to 50% +/- 1%. So even if we wanted to fly more frequencies, we can't. I want those jobs at Delta!
Reply
Old 06-09-2015 | 06:22 PM
  #6908  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Feb 2014
Posts: 463
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by sailingfun
So your previous carrier had a voter fraud committed by the MEC while using ballpoint? What carrier and when?
This union used an electronic ballet system administered by a third party. It included an admin function for those within in the union (that hired the third party company) to "correct" votes if there were any issues. It was through this portal that votes were "massaged".

I don't think it's too much to ask allowing pilots a means to check their votes and reconcile with the system pilot wide. Especially with something as important as this TA. The fact our union resists such transparency raises flags.................................... again.
Reply
Old 06-09-2015 | 06:22 PM
  #6909  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 328
Likes: 0
From: undefined
Default

Originally Posted by GunshipGuy
I'm convinced the supporters of this TA who are part of our pilot group are direct descendants of the French Vichy.
Stockholm Syndrome...
Reply
Old 06-09-2015 | 06:23 PM
  #6910  
forgot to bid's Avatar
veut gagner à la loterie
 
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 23,286
Likes: 0
From: Light Chop
Default

Originally Posted by sailingfun
The current status quo is 1.55.
And that's well above the min of 1.35. If all this growth was planned and known why wasnt the min 1.55?
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Kilroy
ExpressJet
10796
01-11-2016 06:49 AM
FastDEW
Major
201
09-03-2011 06:42 AM
Quagmire
Major
253
04-16-2011 06:19 AM
ksatflyer
Hangar Talk
10
08-20-2008 09:14 PM
INAV8OR
Mergers and Acquisitions
66
05-15-2008 04:37 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices