Airline Pilot Central Forums

Airline Pilot Central Forums (https://www.airlinepilotforums.com/)
-   Delta (https://www.airlinepilotforums.com/delta/)
-   -   Details on Delta TA (https://www.airlinepilotforums.com/delta/88532-details-delta-ta.html)

pilotc90a 06-16-2015 04:20 AM


Originally Posted by Trip7 (Post 1906232)
Because negotiations is not about what you think you deserve, it's what you can negotiate. If a professional negotiator says we've extracted maximum value, and I see all my colleagues around me(FDX/SWA/UPS) getting stomped on, I believe him!

Telling a professional negotiator you believe we can get 15-20% ahead is like a pax coming to your airplane after a wind shear related diversion and stating the weather isn't so bad you could have made it!



I'm sorry I couldn't be more specific about 3 years down the road. I truly apologize.

One's strength in negotiations is the point where you can justify walking away. I contend that Delta needed this deal far more than we did. When the company started down the road paved with massive concessions, we should have walked away. take a week or two off instead of pushing such a fevered pace. No one can tell what would have happened, but judging from the reactions of people I run into, the old agreement is their choice between the two.

Flamer 06-16-2015 04:27 AM


Originally Posted by Denny Crane (Post 1906180)
Let me ask you this... Looking at the long term, what kind of raise do you see us getting in the next contract if we are already ahead of American in (pay and two years earlier entering negotiations)?

Denny

With TAs that suck this bad I expect we should be signing these as often as AEs going forward. Well, eventually we might run out of things to give up.

Sounds 06-16-2015 05:16 AM


Originally Posted by Denny Crane (Post 1906180)
Let me ask you this... Looking at the long term, what kind of raise do you see us getting in the next contract if we are already ahead of American in (pay and two years earlier entering negotiations)?

Denny

If this TA goes through, I have no doubt that the next TA will be a similar steady raise. 15-20%

Like you said though, as long as we lead the industry, we are in a position of weakness at the negotiating table. Neither the company nor the NMB will take our side. That is one of the costs for having a smooth, early, and leading contract.

Moondog 06-16-2015 05:20 AM


Originally Posted by Sounds (Post 1906402)
If this TA goes through, I have no doubt that the next TA will be a similar steady raise. 15-20%

Like you said though, as long as we lead the industry, we are in a position of weakness at the negotiating table. Neither the company nor the NMB will take our side. That is one of the costs for having a smooth, early, and leading contract.

Don't think this is true. We are coming from a position of strength due to record profits and the fact that the pilot group has not made up for the concessionary contracts of yore.

Carl Spackler 06-16-2015 05:37 AM


Originally Posted by Sounds (Post 1906402)
If this TA goes through, I have no doubt that the next TA will be a similar steady raise. 15-20%

Like you said though, as long as we lead the industry, we are in a position of weakness at the negotiating table. Neither the company nor the NMB will take our side. That is one of the costs for having a smooth, early, and leading contract.

Our contract today doesn't lead the industry in one single section. Not one. (Source DALPA contract comparison). This TA is worse, not better. Therefore the only true thing that can be said about this TA is that it's early. It's not smooth and it certainly doesn't lead.

Carl

gzsg 06-16-2015 06:00 AM


Originally Posted by Carl Spackler (Post 1906416)
Our contract today doesn't lead the industry in one single section. Not one. (Source DALPA contract comparison). This TA is worse, not better. Therefore the only true thing that can be said about this TA is that it's early. It's not smooth and it certainly doesn't lead.

Carl


Our vacation is a cruel joke.

Delta 122:30

UAL 137

Alaska 143:30

UPS 175

FedEx 210

In this environment, why would we accept one minute less than Alaska?

Fail.

forgot to bid 06-16-2015 06:01 AM


Originally Posted by Sounds (Post 1906402)
If this TA goes through, I have no doubt that the next TA will be a similar steady raise. 15-20%

Like you said though, as long as we lead the industry, we are in a position of weakness at the negotiating table. Neither the company nor the NMB will take our side. That is one of the costs for having a smooth, early, and leading contract.

I have no doubt the next ta would have similar concessions in productivity and probably the same cost neutral to cost negative raises.

Timbo 06-16-2015 06:07 AM


Originally Posted by forgot to bid (Post 1906426)
I have no doubt the next ta would have similar concessions in productivity and probably the same cost neutral to cost negative raises.

And you can BET we will once again trade away more profit sharing for a 'raise'. We have done this EVERY CONRACT since profit sharing stated paying off!

I said C20125 would be a repeat of C2012.

I was wrong. C2015 is WORSE.

If we vote yes to this POS, what do you think C2018 is going to look like?

Yeah, Worse still!

Less profit sharing, still more concessions and more 3% raises. Count on it.

jobagodonuts 06-16-2015 06:07 AM


Originally Posted by MtEverest (Post 1906331)
Just read this off the MEC Facebook page from a pro TA guy:

"LCA bidders will have to actually earn their pay more, (extremely small group), as far as QOL, ALL our competitors would love our TA...again, not smart to vote no."

So our goal is to give up any good deals left in this profession. Always credit 1 hour for 1 hour or less? Spend more time away from home/family to pay the bills.

Sorry but this seems extremely short sighted. Isn't there already enough gives in this profession. Is it asking too much to keep some good things to counterbalance? Also, what kind of person pushes to give these remaining items away for a small pay raise?!

That same individual telling you that you are "not smart to vote no" once believed his T-38 instructor that they wouldn't be able to hear each other in the T-38 simulator when they exceeded Mach 1...

flyallnite 06-16-2015 06:09 AM

Two big misconception about the new sick leave:

1: It will only affect about one third of the pilots

WRONG. It will affect ALL pilots. Look at the website that lists Sedgwick, the new sick leave administrator, and all the BS they have done. Releasing all medical records, denying claims, harassing employees. That is what they are PAID to do. "GOOD FAITH" puts EVERYONE in the crosshairs.

2: This is being done to 'stop the abuse'.

WRONG. There is no more abuse here than at other companies. There are other ways to reduce abuse (bank system) that wouldn't be so onerous. This is about CONTROL. OF YOU..
When the new mental health regs are released by the FAA, this section will be the most intrusive and potentially threatening to your career of anything imaginable.


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 11:34 AM.


Website Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands