Details on Delta TA
06-17-2015 | 08:52 AM
#9521
Line Holder
Joined: Jun 2009
Posts: 833
Likes: 5
From: Captain
I "think" the way it was explained at the MEC meeting is that it is 15 "work days." Days off between trips would not count towards that 15. I would like to see confirmation on that though.
06-17-2015 | 08:53 AM
#9522
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 2,350
Likes: 0
From: Flying the SEC
The DHS is a guy. He's the AME that helps pilots get their tickets back from the FAA. From what I hear he's a good dude and has helped many pilots continue their career. What I'm worried about is his "designee". That could be anyone, Sedgwick, Bob from India(the scheduler for Continental-Bing it), or Dr Kevorkian. Whomever it is, you can bet their job won't be to help us, it will be to deny us.
06-17-2015 | 08:55 AM
#9523
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 3,457
Likes: 0
From: LAX ERA
I'll go back and look, but I don't believe that's what it says in the NC notepad. Since we no longer have to call in well, the days between the sick trips count as lost work days.
06-17-2015 | 08:57 AM
#9524
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 3,457
Likes: 0
From: LAX ERA
The DHS is a guy. He's the AME that helps pilots get their tickets back from the FAA. From what I hear he's a good dude and has helped many pilots continue their career. What I'm worried about is his "designee". That could be anyone, Sedgwick, Bob from India(the scheduler for Continental-Bing it), or Dr Kevorkian. Whomever it is, you can bet their job won't be to help us, it will be to deny us.
06-17-2015 | 09:08 AM
#9526
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 3,457
Likes: 0
From: LAX ERA
But, to answer your question, they didn't. You are assumed well unless you call in sick again.
06-17-2015 | 09:38 AM
#9527
Straight QOL, homie
Joined: Feb 2012
Posts: 4,202
Likes: 1
From: Record-Shattering Profit Facilitator
06-17-2015 | 10:16 AM
#9528
Line Holder
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 1,503
Likes: 2
From: Fairly local
Professor,
I've been asked by more than one FA if there's language in the TA that gives pilots nonrev/JS priority over FAs.
I didn't see any such language, and on it's face it seemed so ridiculous I just dismissed it out of hand.
But I keep hearing it.
Seems it's a rumor being spread by FAs and by some pilots to FAs.
I've been asked by more than one FA if there's language in the TA that gives pilots nonrev/JS priority over FAs.
I didn't see any such language, and on it's face it seemed so ridiculous I just dismissed it out of hand.
But I keep hearing it.
Seems it's a rumor being spread by FAs and by some pilots to FAs.
06-17-2015 | 10:21 AM
#9529
Runs with scissors
Joined: Dec 2009
Posts: 7,847
Likes: 0
From: Going to hell in a bucket, but enjoying the ride .
Professor,
I've been asked by more than one FA if there's language in the TA that gives pilots nonrev/JS priority over FAs.
I didn't see any such language, and on it's face it seemed so ridiculous I just dismissed it out of hand.
But I keep hearing it.
Seems it's a rumor being spread by FAs and by some pilots to FAs.
I've been asked by more than one FA if there's language in the TA that gives pilots nonrev/JS priority over FAs.
I didn't see any such language, and on it's face it seemed so ridiculous I just dismissed it out of hand.
But I keep hearing it.
Seems it's a rumor being spread by FAs and by some pilots to FAs.
Then add in something about their lost profit sharing paying for it.
06-17-2015 | 10:32 AM
#9530
Line Holder
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 1,503
Likes: 2
From: Fairly local
I figured some pilots might have been messing with them...
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
