Search
Notices

Details on Delta TA

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 06-19-2015, 03:31 PM
  #9781  
veut gagner à la loterie
 
forgot to bid's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Apr 2008
Position: Light Chop
Posts: 23,286
Default

Originally Posted by slowplay View Post
LOL. I forgot, Auburn math...
What's the current ratio?
forgot to bid is offline  
Old 06-19-2015, 03:34 PM
  #9782  
Back on TDY
 
Carl Spackler's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Apr 2008
Position: 747-400 Captain
Posts: 12,487
Default

Originally Posted by forgot to bid View Post
What's the current ratio?
Slowplay is a drive-by bomb thrower. The minute you start to pick him apart, he'll just step on the gas and drive away.

Carl
Carl Spackler is offline  
Old 06-19-2015, 03:53 PM
  #9783  
Gets Weekends Off
 
georgetg's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jul 2006
Position: Boeing Hearing and Ergonomics Lab Rat, Night Shift
Posts: 1,724
Default

Originally Posted by forgot to bid View Post
The C2012 MBH vs DBH ratio was a concession. Plain and simple.

This builds on it, slightly better, but notice they didn’t put a baseline when they said “1.81 means that mainline must grow 50 aircraft.” We have 124 more jets to be delivered plus 60 added in this PWA. How does a 184 aircraft only become a 50 jet growth? By parking 134 jets.

What’s that? The 88 fleet (116 jets) and then some.

We are forever going to be buying and retiring aircraft, what they’re doing is using that natural business process to add larger regional jets to Delta Connection and continue making outsourcing profitable.
It wasn't a concession, it just didn't do what it purported to do...

Back in C2012 (pre 717) the actual MBH to RBH ratio was 1.19:1, that is for every Regional Block hour, there were 1.19 Mainline Block Hours. Remember that was before drawing down the 50 seaters and before adding the 717 and 739.

Maybe someone from ALPA can chime in with our current MBH to RBH ratio, It certainly will be higher than 1.19:1.

Just for kicks, considering a 25% reduction in DCI (approx 600 to 450 Rjs) and flat mainline Block Hours since C2012 would make our current ratio 1.58 (1.19:0.75)

Or flat RJ Block Hours since C2012 and a 30% mainline growth in block hours as slowplay claims would make the current ratio 1.54.

If indeed DCI shrunk by a bunch and mainline increased by 30% our current MBH to RBH ratio ought to be much higher.

How much "wiggle room" does the company get with the 1.81:1 ratio if we keep adding jets and DCI is being reduced?

Cheers
George

Last edited by georgetg; 06-19-2015 at 04:15 PM. Reason: 1.19 vs 1.91
georgetg is offline  
Old 06-19-2015, 04:20 PM
  #9784  
Gets Weekends Off
 
newKnow's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Feb 2007
Position: 765-A
Posts: 6,844
Default

Originally Posted by Ferd149 View Post
too.........many..........threads..........to..... .....keep...........track.........of
Yeah. It's getting to the point where I can't find anything.
newKnow is offline  
Old 06-19-2015, 04:31 PM
  #9785  
veut gagner à la loterie
 
forgot to bid's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Apr 2008
Position: Light Chop
Posts: 23,286
Default

Originally Posted by georgetg View Post
It wasn't a concession, it just didn't do what it purported to do...

Back in C2012 (pre 717) the actual MBH to RBH ratio was 1.19:1, that is for every Regional Block hour, there were 1.19 Mainline Block Hours. Remember that was before drawing down the 50 seaters and before adding the 717 and 739.

Maybe someone from ALPA can chime in with our current MBH to RBH ratio, It certainly will be higher than 1.19:1.

Just for kicks, considering a 25% reduction in DCI (approx 600 to 450 Rjs) and flat mainline Block Hours since C2012 would make our current ratio 1.58 (1.19:0.75)

Or flat RJ Block Hours since C2012 and a 30% mainline growth in block hours as slowplay claims would make the current ratio 1.54.

If indeed DCI shrunk by a bunch and mainline increased by 30% our current MBH to RBH ratio ought to be much higher.

How much "wiggle room" does the company get with the 1.81:1 ratio if we keep adding jets and DCI is being reduced?

Cheers
George
The concession to me was getting rid of the 767 mainline fleet number and the requirement that any 76-seat growth come at the expense of 70-seaters with the max still being 255 jumbo RJs. The proponents of C2012 said it was a gain because the company could pump then dump, but that cost alone would make it a nonstarter not to mention they'd still end up with 255 RJs max. C2012 allowed them to pump while dumping.

That's why I believe it was a concession.

To drop an analogy on this thought, say a Delta pilot and an RJ pilot walk into a bar together. The bartender pours them two free beers of nearly the same size. Maybe the Delta pilot's is larger by a ratio of say, 1.19, but who is counting?

Now before they drink a sip of it the Bartender looks at the Delta pilot and says, if you buy his dinner, I'll make sure you have twice as much beer as he does. Delta pilot says, hell yeah, deal. And bartender reaches over to the RJ pilots beer, pours half of it out, and then gives him his dinner and turns to the Delta pilot and says that'll be $10.

Delta pilot objects. You didn't give me more beer? Nope. But you've got twice as much as he does and that was the deal. That's what that ratio was set at. Take away from DCI, but mainline was not required to have growth. Of course it was sold as 88 airplane growth, but that's not what the ratio required. It was probably more like 20. Out of 580 jets.

Still, this ratio ain't nothing compared to the issues TA2015 presents.
forgot to bid is offline  
Old 06-19-2015, 04:32 PM
  #9786  
veut gagner à la loterie
 
forgot to bid's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Apr 2008
Position: Light Chop
Posts: 23,286
Default

Originally Posted by newKnow View Post
Yeah. It's getting to the point where I can't find anything.
I get that too and don't like it.

But then I realized it's easier to find C66 council letters if it has a dedicated thread.

So it has it's advantages. Think of it as we're on a mission to create as many threads as Delta has manuals.
forgot to bid is offline  
Old 06-19-2015, 04:35 PM
  #9787  
Gets Weekends Off
 
newKnow's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Feb 2007
Position: 765-A
Posts: 6,844
Default

Originally Posted by forgot to bid View Post
I get that too and don't like it.

But then I realized it's easier to find C66 council letters if it has a dedicated thread.

So it has it's advantages. Think of it as we're on a mission to create as many threads as Delta has manuals.
No worries. I created a thread, or three on the TA, too.


It's not your fault. Chit chat is much worse.
newKnow is offline  
Old 06-19-2015, 04:36 PM
  #9788  
veut gagner à la loterie
 
forgot to bid's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Apr 2008
Position: Light Chop
Posts: 23,286
Default

Originally Posted by newKnow View Post
No worries. I created a thread, or three on the TA, too.


It's not your fault. Chit chat is much worse.
I might have 3 or 4 under my belt. I love having our own sub forum.
forgot to bid is offline  
Old 06-19-2015, 05:12 PM
  #9789  
The Brown Dot +1
 
scambo1's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jun 2009
Position: 777B
Posts: 7,775
Default

Originally Posted by georgetg View Post
It wasn't a concession, it just didn't do what it purported to do...

Back in C2012 (pre 717) the actual MBH to RBH ratio was 1.19:1, that is for every Regional Block hour, there were 1.19 Mainline Block Hours. Remember that was before drawing down the 50 seaters and before adding the 717 and 739.

Maybe someone from ALPA can chime in with our current MBH to RBH ratio, It certainly will be higher than 1.19:1.

Just for kicks, considering a 25% reduction in DCI (approx 600 to 450 Rjs) and flat mainline Block Hours since C2012 would make our current ratio 1.58 (1.19:0.75)

Or flat RJ Block Hours since C2012 and a 30% mainline growth in block hours as slowplay claims would make the current ratio 1.54.

If indeed DCI shrunk by a bunch and mainline increased by 30% our current MBH to RBH ratio ought to be much higher.

How much "wiggle room" does the company get with the 1.81:1 ratio if we keep adding jets and DCI is being reduced?

Cheers
George
Now George throw in your calculus using increased RJ stage length.
scambo1 is offline  
Old 06-19-2015, 05:40 PM
  #9790  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Mar 2012
Position: 320B
Posts: 454
Default

Anybody know when the voting will start and end? I'm a poolie so wondering if I will be able to vote or not.
TurbineDriver is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Kilroy
ExpressJet
10671
01-11-2016 06:49 AM
FastDEW
Major
201
09-03-2011 06:42 AM
Quagmire
Major
253
04-16-2011 06:19 AM
ksatflyer
Hangar Talk
10
08-20-2008 09:14 PM
INAV8OR
Mergers and Acquisitions
66
05-15-2008 04:37 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices