Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Major > Delta
C44 Chariman's desperate email. >

C44 Chariman's desperate email.

Search
Notices

C44 Chariman's desperate email.

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 07-04-2015, 04:22 AM
  #11  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Oct 2009
Posts: 3,108
Default

How can you be the chairman of the most powerful council in ALPA and not know number 1 is SCOPE!

PAY does not matter if you don't have a job.

Recall recall recall
gzsg is offline  
Old 07-04-2015, 04:41 AM
  #12  
Banned
 
Joined APC: Apr 2010
Posts: 394
Default

Originally Posted by gzsg View Post
How can you be the chairman of the most powerful council in ALPA and not know number 1 is SCOPE!

PAY does not matter if you don't have a job.

Recall recall recall
RECALL! RECALL! RECALL!

There, it needed a little more pop.
texavia is offline  
Old 07-04-2015, 05:41 AM
  #13  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Oct 2010
Position: Decoupled
Posts: 922
Default

I know I am a really shallow guy. My wife tells me that all the time. At this point in the voting cycle if I get a communication from anyone that is more than two short paragraphs it goes in the trash.

If I'm a no voter, it ****es me off.
If I'm a yes voter, it ****es me off.
If I haven't made up my mind, I don't have time or I'm too lazy to bother.

Keep it short. Leave me alone.
orvil is offline  
Old 07-04-2015, 05:44 AM
  #14  
The Brown Dot +1
 
scambo1's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jun 2009
Position: 777B
Posts: 7,775
Default

Narita p2p guys. Thanks for the beer and dinner. Best use of my dues dollars in the past 2 months.

Still voting No.
scambo1 is offline  
Old 07-04-2015, 05:55 AM
  #15  
Works Every Weekend
 
Check Essential's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Dec 2007
Position: 737 ATL
Posts: 3,506
Default

Originally Posted by texavia View Post
RECALL! RECALL! RECALL!

There, it needed a little more pop.
One step at a time gentlemen.
We need to defeat this TA.

The ALPA sales machinery is cranking at 110%.
Now they've even got Richard Anderson out selling this thing.

This C44 letter and Anderson's message are all about fear of the future.
They've realized they can't get the votes if they rely on the TA's merits.

We need to get the message out that ALPA's dire warnings about what will happen if we vote no are totally unfounded.

ALPA is scared. The Delta pilots should NOT be scared.

After this inadequate TA is rejected we will move forward in a calm and deliberate manner. Contract 2012 will remain in effect and we will make the necessary changes regarding our bargaining team and then return to the negotiations.

Management wants this contract more than we do. That's why they've pushed it through 6 months early. We do NOT have to agree to all these concessions. Let's send it back and do it right.

ALPA's fear campaign is a deception. A better deal is available.
Check Essential is offline  
Old 07-04-2015, 06:24 AM
  #16  
FlySmarterNotHarder
 
UGBSM's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Feb 2006
Position: fifi flyer
Posts: 553
Default

Originally Posted by Check Essential View Post
After this inadequate TA is rejected we will move forward in a calm and deliberate manner. Contract 2012 will remain in effect and we will make the necessary changes regarding our bargaining team and then return to the negotiations.

Management wants this contract more than we do. That's why they've pushed it through 6 months early. We do NOT have to agree to all these concessions. Let's send it back and do it right.

ALPA's fear campaign is a deception. A better deal is available.
And a better deal does not necessarily mean a bigger deal. I might take a smaller pay raise, say, from paltry to meager, if the rest of the contract is largely left alone.
UGBSM is offline  
Old 07-04-2015, 06:28 AM
  #17  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: May 2015
Position: Power top
Posts: 2,959
Default

There is no longer a traditional sales job going on. It's fear of the unknown job. There isn't enough upside of the TA to sell. Standby for heavy rolls. Donatelli will issue the "Mother of all" we will be screwed if this passes. Why did they give us a vote? Talk about not knowing your pilots.
Hank Kingsley is offline  
Old 07-04-2015, 06:32 AM
  #18  
FlySmarterNotHarder
 
UGBSM's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Feb 2006
Position: fifi flyer
Posts: 553
Default

"Last month, the majority of the MEC voted to approve this agreement for membership ratification."

If you read this quickly Hermon's use of italics makes it seem as if the MEC approved this agreement.

They did NOT! (my own italics)

Our union is not approving or recommending anything. They are merely inviting us to participate directly in the negotiating process. This thing needs some changes. Some more back and forth. That's all a NO vote does. Don't even look at it as a rejection, or turning down a deal. It's not. It merely says more work is needed to align this deal with the wishes of the majority.

I hope Richard, Donatelli, and the NC are smart enough to see that.
UGBSM is offline  
Old 07-04-2015, 06:51 AM
  #19  
veut gagner à la loterie
 
forgot to bid's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Apr 2008
Position: Light Chop
Posts: 23,286
Default

Originally Posted by Hank Kingsley View Post
There is no longer a traditional sales job going on. It's fear of the unknown job. There isn't enough upside of the TA to sell. Standby for heavy rolls. Donatelli will issue the "Mother of all" we will be screwed if this passes. Why did they give us a vote? Talk about not knowing your pilots.
This ta is worse than c2012. If we say no we are better off. If the next TA is worse,we are still better off with c2012. Why should we be in a hurry and give up basic work rules to go down to the UAL rules that they hate?
forgot to bid is offline  
Old 07-04-2015, 07:07 AM
  #20  
Mother’s finest
 
SawF16's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Dec 2007
Position: 73NB
Posts: 295
Default

Originally Posted by forgot to bid View Post
This ta is worse than c2012. If we say no we are better off. If the next TA is worse,we are still better off with c2012. Why should we be in a hurry and give up basic work rules to go down to the UAL rules that they hate?
Not taking a position on the TA one way or another, but just to clarify here-

You were adamantly against C2012 when it was a TA up for a vote. So JCBA>C2012>TA2015.

Would you still say you prefer the JCBA to C2012 after how C2012 has turned out pretty much exactly as the "sell job" advertised?

*minus hiring being later than most expected

Last edited by SawF16; 07-04-2015 at 07:09 AM. Reason: Dickson memo
SawF16 is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Flaps50
Cargo
10
03-16-2008 09:18 AM
Albief15
Major
19
12-19-2007 01:51 PM
Joepa84
Piedmont Airlines
2
10-05-2007 08:48 AM
Holding Short
Career Questions
27
08-09-2007 07:19 PM
Shuttle Dog
Fractional
8
03-05-2006 06:02 AM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices