Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Major > Delta
When A 777A Retires........ >

When A 777A Retires........

Search

Notices

When A 777A Retires........

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 09-06-2015 | 08:50 AM
  #61  
Moderator
 
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 7,253
Likes: 96
From: DAL 330
Default

Originally Posted by RockyMtMadDog
Weak logic. Very weak. In the case I cite, pilots WITHIN THEIR OWN CATEGORY are benefiting disproportionately to the rest of the category.

It all comes down to seniority. You are ignoring seniority in one example but applying it in another. Your logic is not consistent.

Scoop
Reply
Old 09-06-2015 | 08:54 AM
  #62  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Jun 2015
Posts: 360
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by Herkflyr
So in your universe having the A350 at 777 rates was a "fail?" At least your screen name is accurate.
Well, I think in any universe but the DAL/DALPA universe, it is a fail in the business sense, particularly if the pay rate was sold as an improvement. If you introduce an airframe that holds more pax (i.e. revenue) than another a/c but pays the same as that lower capacity a/c, how is that not a fail? And FWIW, this is the reason why pay banding is bad.
Reply
Old 09-06-2015 | 09:24 AM
  #63  
scambo1's Avatar
The Brown Dot +1
 
Joined: Jun 2009
Posts: 7,775
Likes: 0
From: 777B
Default

Originally Posted by thinkstraight
We may be missing the point. When a pilot gets bought off for OE then turns around and GS or WS another trip this actually helps the company since they do not have the manning to cover the trips otherwise.

This is why the company wants to eliminate the trips from the pot so that they will have all the other trips covered, they don't want pilots unavailable unless they are sick.

WS and GS actually helps the manning. Can you imagine how many flights cancelled if nobody picks up extra flying?

Exactly. As Sun Tzu said, know thy enemy and know thyself.

We are somewhat necessary to the operation.
Reply
Old 09-06-2015 | 09:26 AM
  #64  
notEnuf's Avatar
Racketeer
 
Joined: Mar 2015
Posts: 13,242
Likes: 702
From: N60.4858 W149.9327
Default

Originally Posted by Herkflyr
So in your universe having the A350 at 777 rates was a "fail?" At least your screen name is accurate.
Not a fail, but certainly not an accomplishment to be touted as a negotiations success. The airplane provides management efficiencies, pilot costs being equal is a gain for management.
Reply
Old 09-06-2015 | 09:38 AM
  #65  
notEnuf's Avatar
Racketeer
 
Joined: Mar 2015
Posts: 13,242
Likes: 702
From: N60.4858 W149.9327
Default

Originally Posted by RockyMtMadDog
In the "old days," if your trip was dropped for an OE, you were subject to recovery flying. That was wrong. The fix, however, results in some FOs who make a mini-career out of getting paid to rarely fly or who make well north of what their counterparts in the left seat make. Either way, it's featherbedding, and provides a disproportionate contractual benefit to a small population.
You are rationalizing for management, why? In the new days, the current C2012 has many hidden gems that Dalpa will not acknowledge or defend ie: scope, 3B4, 3I, FO trip buys. The current landscape is our datum. The historic perspective only seems relevant when they deem it relevant ie: C2K rates.
Reply
Old 09-06-2015 | 09:54 AM
  #66  
notEnuf's Avatar
Racketeer
 
Joined: Mar 2015
Posts: 13,242
Likes: 702
From: N60.4858 W149.9327
Default

Originally Posted by RockyMtMadDog
It's not about insecurity. If you think it's that simple, then the guy with the oxygen deprived tiny brain is looking at you in the mirror. It's simply a productivity issue--getting paid for the work you do vs don't do. Perhaps a middle ground answer would be a hybrid system. Let the FOs drop the trips as they do now, but then they go to the bottom of the trip coverage list. Wouldn't that at least spread the wealth?(. . . although I am not sure the company would buy off as it does not address productivity that much).
Still there is no data on home body F/Os. They are out making double and triple pay. What is the problem? Jealousy?
Reply
Old 09-06-2015 | 10:05 AM
  #67  
notEnuf's Avatar
Racketeer
 
Joined: Mar 2015
Posts: 13,242
Likes: 702
From: N60.4858 W149.9327
Default

Originally Posted by RockyMtMadDog
Weak logic. Very weak. In the case I cite, pilots WITHIN THEIR OWN CATEGORY are benefiting disproportionately to the rest of the category.
Weak? What does "within a category" have to do with it? All categories benefit from trip buys. You decide how to use your seniority. If you want to be senior or junior in a category that is your choice.
Reply
Old 09-06-2015 | 10:10 AM
  #68  
notEnuf's Avatar
Racketeer
 
Joined: Mar 2015
Posts: 13,242
Likes: 702
From: N60.4858 W149.9327
Default

Originally Posted by RockyMtMadDog
Exactly. Some can't see through their anger. The downside to this "solution" from management's view however, is that it does not address productivity. And before someone accuses me of carrying management's water, recall Sun Tzu's "Know your enemy and know yourself . . ." If you can't understand their point of view, we'll never reach an agreement. Guys are pounding their chests about how comfortable they are with the current agreement.

For how long?
I think Sun also said something like wars can be won without blood shed by changing the enemy's mind. Management now sees the will of the group. That will, will have an impact.
Reply
Old 09-06-2015 | 10:38 AM
  #69  
Denny Crane's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Sep 2008
Posts: 6,971
Likes: 0
From: Kickin’ Back
Default

Originally Posted by Klondike Bear
I am surprised I have to explain this but your way would add more guys to reserve. Greenslips happen when there are no more reserves. Your suggestion would have more people on reserve so less Greenslips. Does that make sense?
RMMD,

This is a point you have not answered. Depending on where said pilot is inserted into the coverage tree, there WILL be fewer green slips etc.

Denny
Reply
Old 09-06-2015 | 11:19 AM
  #70  
poostain's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Apr 2011
Posts: 351
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by scoop
it all comes down to seniority. You are ignoring seniority in one example but applying it in another. Your logic is not consistent.

Scoop

mic drop..
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Sata 4000 RP
Major
95
03-12-2013 11:21 AM
MaydayMark
Cargo
12
06-06-2012 06:24 AM
vagabond
Major
86
01-29-2012 12:48 PM
DYNASTY HVY
Hangar Talk
0
10-06-2010 03:00 AM
ehaeckercfi
Regional
1
11-08-2007 12:19 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices