Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Major > Delta
Concessions Are Coming >

Concessions Are Coming

Search

Notices

Concessions Are Coming

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 05-31-2016 | 02:50 PM
  #101  
JamesBond's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: May 2015
Posts: 7,292
Likes: 0
From: A350 Both
Default

Originally Posted by BobZ
Okay....if as you claim our present compensation methodology punishes 'older' hires....than can we assume you also maintain it 'rewards' younger hires?

Or is everyone getting screwed?

And given your 42 year longevity model were in place, could not a 50 year old new hire, with only 15 years of incremental adjustments before retirement make the same argument you are now articulating?

That it is a compensation model that 'punishes' older hires?
Yes. (but that is not the crux of the argument) yes. no. no.
Reply
Old 05-31-2016 | 02:56 PM
  #102  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Jun 2015
Posts: 4,116
Likes: 1
Default

How is a compensation model where a 50 yr old new hire never reaches peak longevity pay less punishing than our current model where that same 50 yr old will have perhaps 3 years at peak earnings rate for a delta pilot?
Reply
Old 05-31-2016 | 02:58 PM
  #103  
scambo1's Avatar
The Brown Dot +1
 
Joined: Jun 2009
Posts: 7,775
Likes: 0
From: 777B
Default

Originally Posted by JamesBond
They payscales should go theoretically 42 years. Not 12. that has never made any sense. Actually it should be a percentage raise for every year you are on the property. The newhire gains his QOL by continuing to convert O2 to CO2. With every year he gets more money, and he gets to choose whatever airplane suits his lifestyle the best. His "seniority" will be relative to the hiring rate of the company. Right now, they guys being hired today are going to have careers you and I only dreamed about. We have a window to fix the retardation we have now where the downside will not even be noticed. If this was industry standard, mergers would be a snap. This is the only thing (aside from jumpseat) we do that is NOT seniority driven. Why?


So let me ask you this: Would you still fly the 777 if you could get paid the same $$ for flying something that would allow you to be home every night or go to better destinations? If not, then the only conclusion is that you have big shiny jet syndrome (or a girlfriend in NRT ). I have heard countless guys say they would fly a C172 if it paid enough. Well, I would like to see them prove that.
Im a rare guy to ask about the 777 maybe, I dont think so. Personally, Id stay on it because it gives me the qol I seek and good pay with the ability to boost the pay when I want.

NRT is another animal...cant stand the place, dont understand what the fnwa guys like about it. Its a 2 workout layover with laundry. NRT is a 1 day min security prison sentance. But Im not happy at all with the pacific flying scope cave centered around NRT.

I loved the 777 when it flew to India and had 3 day asia trips. I like the 777 for the beginning and ending deadheads. Im not trading any of that in to be a 737 or 767 captain. If we had a 6 hour min day, I would revisit that decision.

C150s or general aviation is purely about the fun of flying, low and slow under all the radar vfr. If it paid, It would be great!
Reply
Old 05-31-2016 | 02:59 PM
  #104  
scambo1's Avatar
The Brown Dot +1
 
Joined: Jun 2009
Posts: 7,775
Likes: 0
From: 777B
Default

Originally Posted by BobZ
How is a compensation model where a 50 yr old new hire never reaches peak longevity pay less punishing than our current model where that same 50 yr old will have perhaps 3 years at peak earnings rate for a delta pilot?
I asked the same question.
Reply
Old 05-31-2016 | 03:16 PM
  #105  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Jun 2015
Posts: 4,116
Likes: 1
Default

this 42 year longevity slope....are we to assume the peak rate will be the same as our present 12 year max rate, so this will be a 'flatter' slope to achieve peak earnings?

so it takes 42 years, what under the current model takes 12? or are we expecting to extrapolate from the current 12 year peak....so at the 42 year point a 777A is making somewhere around 3.5 times the 12 year rate?

I don't know about now, but when I came to work near half never made a full retirement age career......with a 42 year slope of longevity increases, I'm betting all we will insure is that the company will never pay the peak rate to a large number of pilots.
Reply
Old 05-31-2016 | 03:21 PM
  #106  
Gunfighter's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
1M Airline Miles
On Reserve
Gets Weekends Off
50 Countries Visited
 
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 5,629
Likes: 654
Default

Originally Posted by scambo1
NRT is another animal...cant stand the place, dont understand what the fnwa guys like about it. Its a 2 workout layover with laundry. NRT is a 1 day min security prison sentance. But Im not happy at all with the pacific flying scope cave centered around NRT.
!
Take the bus or train in to Tokyo, then go to to the fish market and spend a buck or two on some sushi. No need to consume beer and gyoza at the green awning every time you go to NRT.

Tsukiji Market, Chuo, Tokyo, Japan
Reply
Old 05-31-2016 | 03:46 PM
  #107  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: May 2015
Posts: 2,960
Likes: 0
From: Power top
Default

Originally Posted by Gunfighter
Take the bus or train in to Tokyo, then go to to the fish market and spend a buck or two on some sushi. No need to consume beer and gyoza at the green awning every time you go to NRT.

Tsukiji Market, Chuo, Tokyo, Japan
Been there done that. I agree with Mr. S.
Reply
Old 05-31-2016 | 03:51 PM
  #108  
JamesBond's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: May 2015
Posts: 7,292
Likes: 0
From: A350 Both
Default

Originally Posted by BobZ
this 42 year longevity slope....are we to assume the peak rate will be the same as our present 12 year max rate, so this will be a 'flatter' slope to achieve peak earnings?

so it takes 42 years, what under the current model takes 12? or are we expecting to extrapolate from the current 12 year peak....so at the 42 year point a 777A is making somewhere around 3.5 times the 12 year rate?

I don't know about now, but when I came to work near half never made a full retirement age career......with a 42 year slope of longevity increases, I'm betting all we will insure is that the company will never pay the peak rate to a large number of pilots.
"Peak rate" is not relevant to anything. Consistant pay increases year after year will become the norm rather than going thru the stagnant period we are now going thru every contract time. The only thing that would have to really be negotiated would be the base rate. If you prefer to look at it this way, if you are hired as a Captain on day 1, you get X. For the next 42 years of your life you will receive a rate increase of X%. Just for having a pulse and not getting fired. I think it should be steeper towards the beginning because the FO rate would still be based on the CA rate, and "flatten" out as you got more "senior". TVM and all that. I did a study on it once and the amount of money you would have at the end of your career would be eye watering. And that is without any modest investment.
Reply
Old 05-31-2016 | 03:53 PM
  #109  
JamesBond's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: May 2015
Posts: 7,292
Likes: 0
From: A350 Both
Default

Originally Posted by scambo1
Im a rare guy to ask about the 777 maybe, I dont think so. Personally, Id stay on it because it gives me the qol I seek and good pay with the ability to boost the pay when I want.

NRT is another animal...cant stand the place, dont understand what the fnwa guys like about it. Its a 2 workout layover with laundry. NRT is a 1 day min security prison sentance. But Im not happy at all with the pacific flying scope cave centered around NRT.

I loved the 777 when it flew to India and had 3 day asia trips. I like the 777 for the beginning and ending deadheads. Im not trading any of that in to be a 737 or 767 captain. If we had a 6 hour min day, I would revisit that decision.

C150s or general aviation is purely about the fun of flying, low and slow under all the radar vfr. If it paid, It would be great!
Originally Posted by Gunfighter
Take the bus or train in to Tokyo, then go to to the fish market and spend a buck or two on some sushi. No need to consume beer and gyoza at the green awning every time you go to NRT.

Tsukiji Market, Chuo, Tokyo, Japan
Originally Posted by Hank Kingsley
Been there done that. I agree with Mr. S.
So you two could fly another airplane that does things more to your liking and Gunfighter could be more senior on the 777. And you still make the same money. Yeah, that would suck.
Reply
Old 05-31-2016 | 03:59 PM
  #110  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Jun 2015
Posts: 4,116
Likes: 1
Default

you honestly believe management is going to sign on to a 42 year schedule of set rate pay increases?

If they did, they would do so laughing their asses off, knowing, as with the pension, they would never be around to be held accountable for such an obligation......and the upfront 'discount' we would have to pay in every other part of our compensation package to get such a dubious 'guarantee'....would be eye watering.

I'm sure it looked good on paper....maybe the government can operate in that kind of economic certainty....but in the airline business?
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
TheManager
Major
9584
07-28-2015 12:15 PM
GenX
Delta
23
06-27-2015 05:15 PM
iahflyr
NetJets
18
01-30-2015 11:01 AM
flynavyj
Regional
14
08-12-2013 04:18 PM
seahawker01
Regional
74
12-13-2011 05:41 AM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices