Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Regional > Endeavor Air
Any "Latest & Greatest" about Endeavor? >

Any "Latest & Greatest" about Endeavor?

Search

Notices
Endeavor Air Regional Airline

Any "Latest & Greatest" about Endeavor?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 08-13-2017 | 12:36 PM
  #15091  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Nov 2012
Posts: 997
Likes: 0
From: CaptFo
Default

[QUOTE=Woger Wabbit;2409894]
Originally Posted by Yumyum

If it goes as far as a collision, yes, obviously. But there's a couple more BIG safe guards that have to fail before that happens. One, ATC has to miss it (in all cases the error was trapped here). 2, both crews would have to disregard their TCAS RAs before an actual midair went down.

I'm not advocating it's okay by any means, just simply implying that it's the lesser of the three scenarios IMO.

And no need for caps and exclamation points. My hearing is still good.
lol the Caps is for your eyes 👀 not your 👂's. In my humble opinion which probably means absolutely nothing, turning the wrong way on a RNAV departure is just as bad as the other scenarios. Just as dangerous. The fact that ATL revoked RNAV departures for EDV for a couple weeks is simply unacceptable.
Reply
Old 08-13-2017 | 01:19 PM
  #15092  
Line Holder
 
Joined: Apr 2017
Posts: 28
Likes: 0
Default

[QUOTE=CBreezy;2409934]
Originally Posted by Woger Wabbit

So, Air Canada wasn't disturbing because it wasn't an actual collision?
Air Canada nearly landed on a taxiway with multiple aircraft on it. Yes, that’s very disturbing. But what’s that have to do with RNAV departures out of ATL?


[QUOTE=Yumyum;2409936]
Originally Posted by Woger Wabbit

lol the Caps is for your eyes 👀 not your 👂's. In my humble opinion which probably means absolutely nothing, turning the wrong way on a RNAV departure is just as bad as the other scenarios. Just as dangerous. The fact that ATL revoked RNAV departures for EDV for a couple weeks is simply unacceptable.
Ahh, for my eyes. Thanks for your consideration. Was picturing you screaming those last couple words.

Getting revoked is certainly nothing to be proud of, but I find this all kind of interesting. When we started flying RNAVs out of DFW, this was a hot topic back then because crews were making very similar mistakes, and I don't recall them revoking our privileges.

Anyway, my productivity break is wrapping up. Play nice y'all.
Reply
Old 08-13-2017 | 01:25 PM
  #15093  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Jul 2013
Posts: 12,525
Likes: 1,121
Default

Woger, you said if it had gone to a collision, it would have been disturbing. In making that point, you appear to say that it's only disturbing if it does get to that point. Just because you don't hit someone or trigger an RA, blatantly disregarding a clearance at one of the busiest airspaces in the world is troubling and disturbing. It doesn't have to just lead to a collision.
Reply
Old 08-13-2017 | 05:40 PM
  #15094  
On Reserve
 
Joined: Apr 2014
Posts: 122
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by Yumyum

Disturbing? I'd call it a little embarrassing maybe. If those were the only mistakes we were making I'd say we're not doing too bad. Disturbing is getting the shaker multiple times at 390 cuz u went to flight idle to slow and left it there. Disturbing is operating a flight without weather radar activated and going through whatever-T-F that flight in the latest FOU went thru. Pray I'm not on any of those flights
It's disturbing that a professional airline pilot thinks this issue is just "a little embarrassing maybe" and "not too bad". Embarrassing is the least of it. Complying with the departure procedures in ATL or anywhere else is a VERY big deal and failure to comply is pretty far from "not too bad". Botching this up disrupts what's already operating on the razor's edge down there.

How embarrassed will you be when the FAA suspends your license to give you time to think about it? Will that be not too bad as well?

Somebody here added something like "TCAS will keep you out of trouble if you mess up anyway". Come on people. Work on a better reputation for a change.

Pro tip: There's a page in your ATL jepps, 10-3-1 (AAUP pg. 2 of 2), that tells you the runway the departure will USUALLY use. Take advantage of it.

Verify the runway and legs as a crew; it should only take about 10 seconds but there's -always- sufficient time to get it done no matter what's going on. None of you should be advancing any throttles for takeoff until you do. Consider A/P use and actually observing sterile cockpit.
Reply
Old 08-13-2017 | 06:09 PM
  #15095  
Gets Weekends Off
5M Airline Miles
50 Countries Visited
 
Joined: Apr 2016
Posts: 505
Likes: 0
Default

I don't get why people are making a big deal out of this. Clearance verification is what we are supposed to do. The pilot who didn't program the FMS is also supposed to verify the legs pages with the legs on the paper flight plan. If that is not being done then those crews only have themselves to blame.

You should never accept a clearance that you aren't ready to take. I have been sat #1 short of 13 in LGA and my DP has been changed along with a line up and wait clearance twice in one day. Both times that happened to me I had no problem telling the controller "unable lineup we need to verify the new departure and reprogram the FMS, it should take us less than 5 minutes." Never got pulled out of sequence. Never got *****ed at. It took a grand total of 90 seconds to enter the new DP and brief it each time.

If you are blocked out and getting paid then who cares if ATC pulls you out of sequence. My favorite phrase when ATC decided to change the departure/arrival runway, SID, or STAR at the last second is "unable, we need to get new numbers."

The fact that these crews DID NOT DO THEIR JOB is infuriating. Don't ever let ATC bully you into doing something you don't want to do. This topic really needs to come to a close.
Reply
Old 08-13-2017 | 06:24 PM
  #15096  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Feb 2016
Posts: 2,559
Likes: 0
Default

Especially since RNAVs have been back in play for several days now and while I was there, all went well.

Originally Posted by WhiskeyKilo
This topic really needs to come to a close.
Reply
Old 08-13-2017 | 06:32 PM
  #15097  
mooney's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 2,244
Likes: 0
From: CL-65 captain
Default

All I can say after reading some of this is......

Jesus take the wheel!
Reply
Old 08-13-2017 | 07:31 PM
  #15098  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Aug 2015
Posts: 203
Likes: 0
Default

Thinking about applying to Endeavor. I would likely be commuting from PHL. It seems JFK and LGA are the junior bases, anyone here have any experience commuting to these bases out of PHL?
Reply
Old 08-13-2017 | 07:39 PM
  #15099  
Avroman's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 3,142
Likes: 4
From: FIRE ALPA
Default

Originally Posted by flybywp
Thinking about applying to Endeavor. I would likely be commuting from PHL. It seems JFK and LGA are the junior bases, anyone here have any experience commuting to these bases out of PHL?
The commute is either by car or train... Better bet would be to apply to Piedmont and be based where you live.
Reply
Old 08-13-2017 | 07:46 PM
  #15100  
Line Holder
 
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 1,395
Likes: 1
From: the right side
Default

Originally Posted by Avroman
The commute is either by car or train... Better bet would be to apply to Piedmont and be based where you live.
We fly PHL-JFK...
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
StraightShooter
Endeavor Air
124
06-26-2023 10:23 AM
WARich
Delta
11229
06-10-2020 07:42 AM
Crash
Major
3437
01-30-2013 06:51 PM
shua757
Major
2
02-24-2009 06:44 AM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices