Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Regional > Endeavor Air
Any "Latest & Greatest" about Endeavor? >

Any "Latest & Greatest" about Endeavor?


Notices
Endeavor Air Regional Airline

Any "Latest & Greatest" about Endeavor?

Old 04-20-2018 | 11:23 AM
  #19631  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Oct 2017
Posts: 271
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by Casualinterest
Good point was made earlier, be careful not to log more than 9. That was excellent advice.

Sent from my SM-G965U using Tapatalk
So if we can't log more than 9, the company can't log more than 9. So then, what was the point of this change in the first place?
Reply
Old 04-20-2018 | 01:16 PM
  #19632  
Bartok's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Sep 2010
Posts: 1,630
Likes: 0
From: Up Front
Default

Ah.......

What good times when you have to bicker over logbook times so you can upgrade.......
Reply
Old 04-20-2018 | 02:17 PM
  #19633  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 888
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by Casualinterest
Good point was made earlier, be careful not to log more than 9. That was excellent advice.
So absolutely everything I said wasn't completely worthless, you at least took this away.

Something worthwhile came out of this discussion. My work here is done.

Now just ignore that if you agree it's a risk to log more than 9 hours in a day, the only really compelling argument there was for continuing to log block is consistency. If you can't log block all the time (because sometimes it would raise questions of legality), then the consistency argument is out the window.

But at least if you don't log more than 9 hrs you won't have to deal with that potential question of your logbook in an interview. You still will have falsified your logbook for those extra 5 minutes each flight that you are completely aware of (and have accurate accounting for) that don't meet the definition of FAR 1.1 but you'll never get caught, so at least there's that. Clearly some people take the "I certify these entries are true" at the bottom of each page a little liberally. True-ish. I mean, I know they don't meet FAR 1.1 definition, and I know by how much each leg, because I had to adjust it, but "true".

Now how do we tell the guys that only read the company memos; log block time unless it's over 9 hours, then don't. Because it's one of those poor unsuspecting guys that could potentially get screwed over in an interview. They will be sitting there with 11 hours on a day in their logbook and won't even know they did anything wrong because... "the company said block time" which another company won't care about.

I guess I shouldn't worry about those guys, because if they lose their opportunity for the next job, more opportunity for me. As long as I get mine, right?
Reply
Old 04-20-2018 | 02:25 PM
  #19634  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 888
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by Shadre Reevis
So if we can't log more than 9, the company can't log more than 9. So then, what was the point of this change in the first place?
The Company is going to log flight time for the purposes of preventing you from timing out on FAR 117 flight time.

For other purposes they're going to use block time.

They're also advising us to log block time.

Of course, you're just as obligated as the company to be aware of your flight time for legality and that will be difficult if you're only tracking block.

I've been corrected by 2 year FO's that this is something I shouldn't worry about.

You can choose for yourself what to do with that information.
Reply
Old 04-20-2018 | 03:29 PM
  #19635  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Oct 2017
Posts: 271
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by Blueskies21
The Company is going to log flight time for the purposes of preventing you from timing out on FAR 117 flight time.

For other purposes they're going to use block time.

They're also advising us to log block time.

Of course, you're just as obligated as the company to be aware of your flight time for legality and that will be difficult if you're only tracking block.

I've been corrected by 2 year FO's that this is something I shouldn't worry about.

You can choose for yourself what to do with that information.
It is interesting that 121.436 does not specifically require flight hours to upgrade, it only says hours. Once the door closes you are still operating as a crew member with intention to fly, even if you are not 117 flying yet. Same principle with the old Hobbs meters running before movement. Block hours should be sufficient for logging purposes.

There is no maximum for block in FAR 117 AFAIK, the limitation only applies to flight time. So, I don't see why you couldn't block more than 8/9 hours as long as your flight time remains within limits. But if you do record more than 8/9 hours of block in a day (good luck with that), just be ready to explain the difference between block and flight time, and how you and your company keep track of each. On the RARE occasion that you ever get that much block, just make a small note of the day's total flight time in the logbook..
Reply
Old 04-20-2018 | 04:01 PM
  #19636  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Oct 2017
Posts: 271
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by mojo6911
FAR 1.1 is clear.
You need to read more than 1.1


What is flight time?
14CFR 1.1
(1) Pilot time that commences when an aircraft moves under its own power for the purpose of flight and ends when the aircraft comes to rest after landing;

But what is pilot time?
14CFR 61.1
Pilot time means that time in which a person—
(i) Serves as a required pilot flight crewmember; (ie door closure, meaning block......)

So, should we log pilot time or flight time in our logbooks?
14CFR 61.51
(c) Logging of pilot time. The pilot time described in this section may be used to:
(1) Apply for a certificate or rating issued under this part or a privilege authorized under this part; or
(2) Satisfy the recent flight experience requirements of this part.
Reply
Old 04-20-2018 | 04:03 PM
  #19637  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 888
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by Shadre Reevis
It is interesting that 121.436 does not specifically require flight hours to upgrade, it only says hours. Once the door closes you are still operating as a crew member with intention to fly, even if you are not 117 flying yet. Same principle with the old Hobbs meters running before movement. Block hours should be sufficient for logging purposes.

There is no maximum for block in FAR 117 AFAIK, the limitation only applies to flight time. So, I don't see why you couldn't block more than 8/9 hours as long as your flight time remains within limits. But if you do record more than 8/9 hours of block in a day (good luck with that), just be ready to explain the difference between block and flight time, and how you and your company keep track of each. On the RARE occasion that you ever get that much block, just make a small note of the day's total flight time in the logbook..
That's the best argument I've seen to support block vs flight.... you're absolutely correct 121.436 a.3 itself says "hours" which fully supports your argument. However 121.436 c says "(c) For the purpose of satisfying the flight hour requirement in paragraph (a)(3) of this section, a pilot may credit 500 hours of military flight time obtained as pilot in command of a multiengine turbine-powered, fixed-wing airplane in an operation requiring more than one pilot." There's no other hour requirement in (a)(3) except the 1000 hrs, so I think we're forced to conclude that must be a flight hour requirement.

You're also correct as far as I know about there not being a block hour limit in 121 or 117 but I'd still be careful about logging more than 9 hours a day in my logbook because I'm not real interested in having a block hour vs flight hour discussion in an interview. As we all know, block hour logging has been the standard but we didn't have a good way to track flight hours, now we do.
Reply
Old 04-20-2018 | 04:14 PM
  #19638  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Oct 2017
Posts: 271
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by Blueskies21
That's the best argument I've seen to support block vs flight.... you're absolutely correct 121.436 a.3 itself says "hours" which fully supports your argument. However 121.436 c says "(c) For the purpose of satisfying the flight hour requirement in paragraph (a)(3) of this section, a pilot may credit 500 hours of military flight time obtained as pilot in command of a multiengine turbine-powered, fixed-wing airplane in an operation requiring more than one pilot." There's no other hour requirement in (a)(3) except the 1000 hrs, so I think we're forced to conclude that must be a flight hour requirement.

You're also correct as far as I know about there not being a block hour limit in 121 or 117 but I'd still be careful about logging more than 9 hours a day in my logbook because I'm not real interested in having a block hour vs flight hour discussion in an interview. As we all know, block hour logging has been the standard but we didn't have a good way to track flight hours, now we do.
My post above explains how civilians can log time to meet experience requirements. I have no idea how the military logs their time, they are separate from the FAA. You can't bridge the two so easily.
Reply
Old 04-20-2018 | 04:16 PM
  #19639  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Jan 2017
Posts: 527
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by Shadre Reevis
So, should we log pilot time or flight time in our logbooks?
14CFR 61.51
(b)Logbook entries. For the purposes of meeting the requirements of paragraph (a) of this section, each person must enter the following information for each flight or lesson logged:

(1) General -

(i) Date.

(ii) Total flight time or lesson time.
Reply
Old 04-20-2018 | 04:21 PM
  #19640  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Oct 2017
Posts: 271
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by vessbot
(b)Logbook entries. For the purposes of meeting the requirements of paragraph (a) of this section, each person must enter the following information for each flight or lesson logged:

(1) General -

(i) Date.

(ii) Total flight time or lesson time.
So the same reference tells us two different things. Clear as mud.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
StraightShooter
Endeavor Air
124
06-26-2023 10:23 AM
WARich
Delta
11229
06-10-2020 07:42 AM
Crash
Major
3437
01-30-2013 06:51 PM
shua757
Major
2
02-24-2009 06:44 AM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Thread Tools
Search this Thread
Your Privacy Choices