Signed Retro Pay LOA
09-30-2019, 06:43 PM
#22
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Nov 2016
Posts: 2,465
Originally Posted by NoValueAviator
PZ is in our emails about it. Didn’t use the G word though. 20 hour override for August, let’s go.
09-30-2019, 07:22 PM
#24
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Jan 2017
Posts: 2,510
Originally Posted by highfarfast
Just for August? The way I read the LOA it was an all or nothing either/or. They didn't give us the full back pay, now they owe us 20 hr override for each month... what has been paid now will apply to the 20 hr/mo but that's more than just August.
10-01-2019, 12:09 AM
#27
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Feb 2018
Position: Resigned
Posts: 1,547
Originally Posted by highfarfast
Just for August? The way I read the LOA it was an all or nothing either/or. They didn't give us the full back pay, now they owe us 20 hr override for each month... what has been paid now will apply to the 20 hr/mo but that's more than just August.
10-01-2019, 04:15 AM
#28
New Hire
Joined APC: Mar 2017
Posts: 4
Originally Posted by highfarfast
Just for August? The way I read the LOA it was an all or nothing either/or. They didn't give us the full back pay, now they owe us 20 hr override for each month... what has been paid now will apply to the 20 hr/mo but that's more than just August.
10-01-2019, 05:49 AM
#29
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Sep 2019
Posts: 413
Originally Posted by Smackover
This is right. They determined they could pay actual retroactive pay but they were wrong. That triggers the “otherwise” language in the LOA - 20 hours per month from June 1 to implementation of the new rates.
If that’s the case, the company should have went with the 20hrs/month from the start, they would be easily up to date and no penalty would apply.
10-01-2019, 07:49 AM
#30
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Sep 2016
Posts: 198
Originally Posted by Chato
Am i understanding this right. They owe August hours plus july premium + 20 hour penalty as of October for not paying on time.
If that’s the case, the company should have went with the 20hrs/month from the start, they would be easily up to date and no penalty would apply.
If that’s the case, the company should have went with the 20hrs/month from the start, they would be easily up to date and no penalty would apply.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
