Search

Notices
Envoy Airlines Regional Airline

Envoy's future

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 07-08-2014 | 10:10 AM
  #1811  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 2,168
Likes: 0
From: Reclined
Default

Originally Posted by eaglefly
That MAY now be subjective. The question is "what" is AA for the purposes of the Envoy flow now that the carrier is merged. Sure there are still two (or three depending on your angle) seniority lists, but does the 824 flow language guarantee placement on the present APA seniority list or a just a "position at AA", which in managements interpretation could be initial assignment to the US Airways side ?
The 4 party agreement doesn't do either of the things you say.
Old 07-08-2014 | 10:39 AM
  #1812  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Dec 2013
Posts: 1,054
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by embraer
You are going all in with your anti-Mason crusade, aren't you? That is a big gamble seeing as how Mason has been so accurate in the past.

If/When all he is saying starts to come true what will you have to say then? Or will you just back away slowly into the shadows hoping that we all forget how much you hammered the guy?
I think you should visit some fortune tellers in Vegas next time you are. I think you would like them.
Old 07-08-2014 | 11:54 AM
  #1813  
Banned
 
Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 8,350
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by Mason32
The 4 party agreement doesn't do either of the things you say.
I didn't SAY they did anything, I ASKED. Besides, the 824 provisions were an arbitration award and as we speak, the agreement it's based on is being violated by Parker in spirit re: metering (which Envoy ALPA is grieving), so in theory, yes, the beloved concept of managements "interpretation" isn't out of the question regarding this aspect. AA or U, they WOULD be mainline positions and identical compensation-wise. Regardless, this COULD be a negotiating point.
Old 07-08-2014 | 11:57 AM
  #1814  
Buzzlightyear's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Mar 2014
Posts: 569
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by eaglefly
I didn't SAY they did anything, I ASKED. Besides, the 824 provisions were an arbitration award and as we speak, the agreement it's based on is being violated by Parker in spirit re: metering (which Envoy ALPA is grieving). Regardless, this COULD be a negotiating point.
FYI, the metering began pre Parker. That was not driven from him.
Old 07-08-2014 | 12:13 PM
  #1815  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 2,168
Likes: 0
From: Reclined
Default

Originally Posted by Buzzlightyear
FYI, the metering began pre Parker. That was not driven from him.
Agreed, but you can't correct people like him. EF's hopeless.



it doesn't do either of the things you say

vs.

it doesn't do either of the things you say in your question



Same thing, but one makes him feel better. If you read his posting, it's obvious it's a question; and it doesn't do either of the things he's saying.

He must have been fun to fly with when he actually had authority in the left seat. No wonder he comes here trying to relive it and talk down to everybody.

I'd much prefer to spend my time trying to help people. To each their own.
Old 07-08-2014 | 12:19 PM
  #1816  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Dec 2012
Posts: 547
Likes: 0
Default

Parker was in charge by default for some time. He and Kirby act as they were not a party to our BK contract when in fact everything had to pass their purview. See the world did not really change and executives are crooks for the most part.
Old 07-08-2014 | 12:51 PM
  #1817  
Banned
 
Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 8,350
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by Buzzlightyear
FYI, the metering began pre Parker. That was not driven from him.
Not the point. Parker could have corrected that. He didn't. That's the point.
Old 07-08-2014 | 12:54 PM
  #1818  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Aug 2013
Posts: 316
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by Buzzlightyear
FYI, the metering began pre Parker. That was not driven from him.
Try not to reply to him, he will post back 3 more times, each one longer than the one prior with the last one being 8 paragraphs all telling you why you're wrong.

It's best just to just not read and skip over his posts.
Old 07-08-2014 | 12:57 PM
  #1819  
Banned
 
Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 8,350
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by Mason32
Agreed, but you can't correct people like him. EF's hopeless.



it doesn't do either of the things you say

vs.

it doesn't do either of the things you say in your question



Same thing, but one makes him feel better. If you read his posting, it's obvious it's a question; and it doesn't do either of the things he's saying.

He must have been fun to fly with when he actually had authority in the left seat. No wonder he comes here trying to relive it and talk down to everybody.

I'd much prefer to spend my time trying to help people. To each their own.
So to prove your point about my supposed hopelessness and apparent inferiority, you become what you claim I am - essentially one who attacks others and talks down to them. I guess it's ok to be the pot, but not the kettle. Well, by the same observation, thankfully I don't have to fly with you. You sound like the paternalistic self-indulgent authority figure most F/O's avoid like the plague. I see nothing in you here that is indicative of a mason, let alone one who has achieved higher status. Considering the level at which you spill your guts on this forum, you certainly can't keep a secret or not betray a trust.
Old 07-08-2014 | 12:57 PM
  #1820  
Banned
 
Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 8,350
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by Feng
Try not to reply to him, he will post back 3 more times, each one longer than the one prior with the last one being 8 paragraphs all telling you why you're wrong.

It's best just to just not read and skip over his posts.
Better yet, put me on ignore !
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
JetJock16
Regional
278
03-10-2017 02:03 PM
par8head
Money Talk
31
12-23-2015 03:03 AM
warriordriver
Regional
37
07-10-2014 04:39 PM
FloridaGator
Hangar Talk
26
10-02-2008 10:24 AM
flyharm
Mergers and Acquisitions
5
09-11-2008 05:08 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices