Search

Notices
Envoy Airlines Regional Airline

The useful Envoy thread

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 08-02-2014 | 10:48 AM
  #371  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Dec 2012
Posts: 610
Likes: 0
Default

Your right, that's why you have to vote no when approached under a contract on general principle. They forecast their doom and gloom runaway the new hires stagnate the upgrades and at the end of the day your under the same contract you were before. If they would have never opened their mouth the sun would have come back out form BK and business as usual would appear all positive with record profits. Now everybody's all strung out that a deal needs to happen, it doesn't. I am glad I learned this lesson young, If ever approached under a contract your either giving me a freebie or were not talking.

Thank you copy copy, with sincerity

Last edited by Waitingformins; 08-02-2014 at 10:49 AM. Reason: to add thanks
Reply
Old 08-02-2014 | 10:57 AM
  #372  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 3,707
Likes: 0
Default

no deal is needed by the pilots at envoy. we have a bk contract good for 6.5 years more.
Reply
Old 08-02-2014 | 11:14 AM
  #373  
embraer's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Aug 2008
Posts: 545
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by buddies8
no deal is needed by the pilots at envoy. we have a bk contract good for 6.5 years more.
That contract is crap and you know it. It doesn't offer the company any protections against 15+ year Captains and it CERTAINLY doesn't offer any protections or guarantees to the pilot group.

It is the last vestiges of the Tony regime. That alone is all we need to know about our current contract. It's worthless from multiple angles and needs to die.

While we are at it we need better Trip Trading language in our new contract. Redder than Red and unable to trade down is utter nonsense.
Reply
Old 08-02-2014 | 11:17 AM
  #374  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Jan 2013
Posts: 1,648
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by embraer
That contract is crap and you know it. It doesn't offer the company any protections against 15+ year Captains and it CERTAINLY doesn't offer any protections or guarantees to the pilot group.

It is the last vestiges of the Tony regime. That alone is all we need to know about our current contract. It's worthless from multiple angles and needs to die.

While we are at it we need better Trip Trading language in our new contract. Redder than Red and unable to trade down is utter nonsense.
I'm glad someone said it, that BK contract is absolute garbage and we shouldn't be falling on our collective sword to protect it.
Reply
Old 08-02-2014 | 11:22 AM
  #375  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Jun 2009
Posts: 161
Likes: 1
Default

Originally Posted by Bzzt
I'm glad someone said it, that BK contract is absolute garbage and we shouldn't be falling on our collective sword to protect it.
Agreed. The same guys who were so against the BK contract are the ones now preaching to "come back to us in another 7 years, we've got a contract"
Reply
Old 08-02-2014 | 11:28 AM
  #376  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Dec 2012
Posts: 610
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by embraer
That contract is crap and you know it. It doesn't offer the company any protections against 15+ year Captains and it CERTAINLY doesn't offer any protections or guarantees to the pilot group.

It is the last vestiges of the Tony regime. That alone is all we need to know about our current contract. It's worthless from multiple angles and needs to die.

While we are at it we need better Trip Trading language in our new contract. Redder than Red and unable to trade down is utter nonsense.
Maye so, but if the company really wanted to negotiate in good faith, they would announce 824 called up by middle of next year, announce a predictable flow rate for protected pilots, sprinkle in news of the 175, and hold a vote after they flow the top 20% of the pay scale.

Instead, bring in the knuckledraggers, beat you up drag you out the back of the bar and kick you in the teeth to soften you up for future negotiations, all right after telling a judge this is a good faith agreement and whats needed to exit BK with 10 billion thats a B.
Reply
Old 08-02-2014 | 11:44 AM
  #377  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Jan 2013
Posts: 1,648
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by Waitingformins
Maye so, but if the company really wanted to negotiate in good faith, they would announce 824 called up by middle of next year, announce a predictable flow rate for protected pilots, sprinkle in news of the 175, and hold a vote after they flow the top 20% of the pay scale.

Instead, bring in the knuckledraggers, beat you up drag you out the back of the bar and kick you in the teeth to soften you up for future negotiations, all right after telling a judge this is a good faith agreement and whats needed to exit BK with 10 billion thats a B.
I don't agree with the reasoning and I do think it's bull****, but our agreement was done prior to the merger. Douggie wants something different and he is the boss, fair or not. The United States is not structured to protect the working man, better get used to it.
Reply
Old 08-02-2014 | 11:54 AM
  #378  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 3,041
Likes: 0
From: GV Captain
Default

Originally Posted by chignutsak
So in your view, all the no voters mistakenly believed that DP and company would just roll over and cave in, saying, "Yep, they hanging tough, lets's not waste any more time and send all the new aircraft to ENY?" Do you really think all the no voters felt there would be no pain and consequences?
Deep down they all thought that was going to happen. So far the company has done what they said they were going to do. Send planes elsewhere. PSA Mesa has no problems attracting new hires.

Get Real, there won't be any pay raises at this joint. The only way to get a raise is by upgrading and we aren't so.
Sad but true.....

I voted No.
Reply
Old 08-02-2014 | 12:02 PM
  #379  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Jul 2014
Posts: 833
Likes: 0
From: Feito no Brasil, CA
Default

This is a foolish debate about voting yes on the previous offer based on the opportunity to flow.

They are withholding our pilots against the current contract. They are withholding usair wholly owned regionals flow pilots without regard to their contract.

They will continue to do the same regardless of what you sign. If that means you being withheld until they decide to fold the company, that's what is going to happen. Voting yes on a future flow that isn't even being honored in multiple instances currently is stupid.

The only way I'd vote yes on anything regarding a flow is if it contains AA numbers for everyone at upgrade. Airline folds? So what, you hop off unemployment when your number's called.
Reply
Old 08-02-2014 | 12:37 PM
  #380  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Mar 2011
Posts: 332
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by RJ Pilot
PSA Mesa has no problems attracting new hires.
Um yeah by cold calling people over the phone and offering them class dates on the spot with no interview required. I'm sorry but Eagle is a bit more picky than that with their hiring practices. You are not comparing apples to apples my friend. Also I don't believe for a minute that we are trying real hard to fill classes, I think they want to shrink this company down, but who really knows why....
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
757Driver
Major
0
10-13-2010 01:33 PM
⌐ AV8OR WANNABE
Hangar Talk
2
04-12-2008 10:46 AM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices