Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Regional > Retired Regionals > ExpressJet
United looking at ExpressJet article... >

United looking at ExpressJet article...

Search
Notices
ExpressJet Regional Airline

United looking at ExpressJet article...

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 01-05-2018, 10:55 AM
  #171  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Feb 2016
Posts: 602
Default

Originally Posted by Bluewaffle View Post
Yes, as long as it says United on the side of the plane you’re right. Passengers don’t know the difference. I don’t see how that translates into you’re automatically hired at Mainline. Bad apples slip through the cracks everywhere. Does that mean we just stop interviewing? There has to be checks and balances along the way. Asking express pilots to interview isn’t a overwhelming barrier that can’t be overcome. It’s a completely different company.
I disagree. If a pilot has been providing express service to United for over a decade, at an airline that has been run into the ground by mainline and an anti-union parent company, I believe they should be thrown some sort of bone. Don't get me wrong, I'm not interested in UAL, and don't have any desire to come over there, but my friends have poured their souls into this express operation, only to get torn to shreds by certain individuals during their interview for no good reason besides mainline ego.

That's my piece, take it or leave it.
AboveMins is offline  
Old 01-05-2018, 10:57 AM
  #172  
Line Holder
 
Joined APC: Feb 2008
Posts: 35
Default

Originally Posted by Bluewaffle View Post
We’re not talking about a merger.
You might not be, but its been mentioned. Point is, interviews are not always conducted.
asa rat is offline  
Old 01-05-2018, 12:38 PM
  #173  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Sep 2014
Posts: 828
Default

Originally Posted by stbloc View Post
I think I might take the risk and apply here. I want IAH and as everyone leaves for the exit something good may happen and I'll be in a good spot. It's a risk but Mesa will always be hiring so why not take my chance. I just don't see how they can fold it up. Who could replace it? No regional has the capacity to step in and take over. I may be wrong but like another person said few pages back, buy low sell high. No reward without risk.
You never know in this industry. Hopefully we have hit bottom and are climbing once again! It's still a great place to be.
Hou757 is offline  
Old 01-05-2018, 01:36 PM
  #174  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Aug 2010
Posts: 200
Default

[QUOTE=DirkDiggler;2495727]Yeah basically many angry people, rightfully so. The CRJ guys close to retirement were flipping out about the loss of delta travel benefits for retirement and possibly not able to get UA benefits for retirement because not enough credit with UA. Company apparently thinks it's all roses and things are fine. Greg W basically said the new endeavor CBA is equivalent to our CBA because of all our soft time and said he would pay us "$200 an hour if I could write the rest of the contract."

That's the second time I've heard the $200 an hour thing. I'm calling GW bluff. I'll take $200 an hour and GW you write the contract. I only have one request 75 hour guarantee.

701EV
701EV is offline  
Old 01-05-2018, 04:22 PM
  #175  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jan 2018
Posts: 23
Default

Originally Posted by ecam View Post
A bit of history to put things in context.

When Delta bought Comair in 1999, and ASA in 2000, everyone expected a merger and/or a staple. "Flow" was almost unheard of then. The ASA side tried to invoke ALPA merger policy on the floor of the BOD in 2000 and it was killed on the floor, then stuffed into a committee room. After rudimentary negotiations between the MECs, and some unreasonable demands from the senior folks at CMR and ASA, DALPA walked away. Then they instituted strict scope restrictions which limited our career potential. So we sued them for malfeasance and conflict of interest, demanding fair treatment by the union we all pay dues to, and application of ALPA's own merger policy. This lasted about 5 years. The settlement was that ALPA owes the regionals nothing in terms of seniority because they were "wholly owned subsidiaries" and not ever part of the mainline, with no parity in airframes or career expectation. However, the wholly owned regionals were to get "a seat at the table" in all future scope negotiations. ALPA's argument was that it was never a merger of equals.

Now it appears we are seeing this again. Except that ALPA's position hasn't changed. In fact, no ALPA represented pilot group has a flow through agreement. Flow is NOT popular with the MECs OR management because they lose control of hiring. Their argument is that there's A LOT of "undesirables" at the top of the regional airline seniority lists who literally have zero chance of being hired at a legacy due to lack of degrees, bad records, and terrible attitudes. Should these people be given a winning lottery ticket over other pilots who have all their ducks in a row? Is that good for anyone? Probably not. I didn't feel that way in 1999, but I get it now.

And furthermore, if ALPA (national) went back on their statement from the RJDC suit and reversed course, giving a purchased regional seniority, it would seem to negate that whole settlement. An awful lot of CMR and ASA pilots would be owed seniority numbers at DAL and the lawsuits would be tremendous. Ain't gonna happen.

UAL may or may not buy a stake in your company, but the best you will ever be offered is an "enhanced" CPP. Maybe skip the Hogan and get a guaranteed interview. You will NEVER be given straight seniority or even flow. If you want to work for a legacy, the best thing you can do is update your resume, step up your networking, and polish your interview skills. Sitting there waiting to see if something happens might be career suicide. A lot of great pilots spent years on the street or made lateral/backwards moves after we shut down. Your LGA base closing early should be all the sign you need!

Remember, it's easier to find a job when you already have a job.
Just a couple of points, not withstanding the whole RJDC lawsuit, but Delta basically performed a hostile takeover of ASA. Atlantic Southeast Airlines was acquired for $34 dollars a share in a tender offer of remaining outstanding shares in February 1999. The stock had traded around $76 per share just months earlier, prior to Delta's full court press, and Delta subsequently acquired Comair eight months later.

The respective MEC's at ASA and Comair did in fact believe that ALPA Merger Policy had been triggered, and the matter was brought before the Executive Council for a vote. It was rejected out of hand with only the two Regional EVPs voting in favor.

The RJDC coalition then pursued other legal avenues.
brasiliae120 is offline  
Old 01-05-2018, 06:06 PM
  #176  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Sep 2011
Position: lav dumper
Posts: 707
Default

Originally Posted by 701EV View Post

That's the second time I've heard the $200 an hour thing. I'm calling GW bluff. I'll take $200 an hour and GW you write the contract. I only have one request 75 hour guarantee.

701EV
I recorded the call.. He definitely said it.
DirkDiggler is offline  
Old 01-05-2018, 06:09 PM
  #177  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Sep 2011
Position: lav dumper
Posts: 707
Default

Originally Posted by stbloc View Post
I think I might take the risk and apply here. I want IAH and as everyone leaves for the exit something good may happen and I'll be in a good spot. It's a risk but Mesa will always be hiring so why not take my chance. I just don't see how they can fold it up. Who could replace it? No regional has the capacity to step in and take over. I may be wrong but like another person said few pages back, buy low sell high. No reward without risk.
You will be on reserve for a very very long time with an indefinite upgrade right now with the ISL and CRJ people.
DirkDiggler is offline  
Old 01-05-2018, 08:58 PM
  #178  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jul 2013
Posts: 4,691
Default

Originally Posted by ecam View Post
Except that ALPA's position hasn't changed. In fact, no ALPA represented pilot group has a flow through agreement.
What am I missing?

Eagle/EnvoyALPA, flow
PSA , flow
Piedmont ALPA, flow
John Carr is offline  
Old 01-05-2018, 09:37 PM
  #179  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jul 2008
Posts: 4,205
Default

AA is not alpa... no alpa regional to alpa major flow..
amcnd is offline  
Old 01-05-2018, 10:08 PM
  #180  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jul 2013
Posts: 4,691
Default

Originally Posted by amcnd View Post
AA is not alpa... no alpa regional to alpa major flow..
Well all righty then.

Yet groups represented by ALPA do have a flow.

I doubt that if ALPA was surviving collective bargaining agent of the USAair/AA merge that the flows would have gone away.
John Carr is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Crawl
CommuteAir
5406
03-21-2020 06:45 AM
JetJock16
Regional
278
03-10-2017 02:03 PM
Duct Mon
Regional
256
07-31-2015 06:55 PM
aileronjam
United
7
07-10-2012 09:35 PM
JoeyMeatballs
ExpressJet
47
10-25-2007 07:11 AM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices