Search
Notices
ExpressJet Regional Airline

Is ExpressJet that bad?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 04-05-2018, 06:54 PM
  #31  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Punkpilot48's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Dec 2005
Position: Jungle Jet
Posts: 364
Default

ExpressJet announced its greatness today: we go to Jackson Hole now! Problems solved!

No word on how that flight attendant is doing in flight training though.... I’m getting concerned.
Punkpilot48 is offline  
Old 04-05-2018, 06:55 PM
  #32  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Punkpilot48's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Dec 2005
Position: Jungle Jet
Posts: 364
Default

Originally Posted by Itsajob View Post
I was on one of your jumpseats recently and a check airman was telling me about the low quality pilot applicants that you guys are getting now. He was complaining about pilots having to repeat multiple sims (no one fails AQP, you just do it over) and not being fired after months in the program due to multiple unsatisfactory training sessions and then requiring excessive IOE. He said that needing 100 hours was common. Was he bitter and blowing smoke or is there really a problem? The crews that I have seen in the jumpseat have been fine and I find it hard to believe that any pilot who fails multiple sims would still be employed after just a couple failures. Needing 100 hours is also crazy.
It’s not every new hire but it’s not just one or two.
Punkpilot48 is offline  
Old 04-05-2018, 07:36 PM
  #33  
Banned
 
Joined APC: Mar 2018
Posts: 1,358
Default

Originally Posted by Punkpilot48 View Post
It’s not every new hire but it’s not just one or two.
I find it troubling that the ones that can’t keep up are able to stay. I don’t want them flying my family around. We were all new at one time but I have never heard of being able to have that many failures and stay employed. Some people should be washed out.
Itsajob is offline  
Old 04-05-2018, 07:38 PM
  #34  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Mar 2005
Posts: 1,888
Default

Originally Posted by Itsajob View Post
I was on one of your jumpseats recently and a check airman was telling me about the low quality pilot applicants that you guys are getting now. He was complaining about pilots having to repeat multiple sims (no one fails AQP, you just do it over) and not being fired after months in the program due to multiple unsatisfactory training sessions and then requiring excessive IOE. He said that needing 100 hours was common. Was he bitter and blowing smoke or is there really a problem? The crews that I have seen in the jumpseat have been fine and I find it hard to believe that any pilot who fails multiple sims would still be employed after just a couple failures. Needing 100 hours is also crazy.
So far I have not had any issues with FOs on the line being able to fly, but I’m on the CRJ side and we don’t see new hires any more. Heck, it’s a rare day I fly with an actual FO. Normally it’s a four striper.
Instructor moral seems pretty low. Last AQP was pretty depressing. Of course these are senior guys who put their hearts and souls into supporting DAL for years and don’t even get to keep their retiree pass benefits they were promised. Kind of feels like your wife has run off with your younger neighbor and cleaned out you bank account in the process.
Blackhawk is offline  
Old 04-05-2018, 08:04 PM
  #35  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Punkpilot48's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Dec 2005
Position: Jungle Jet
Posts: 364
Default

Originally Posted by Itsajob View Post
I find it troubling that the ones that can’t keep up are able to stay. I don’t want them flying my family around. We were all new at one time but I have never heard of being able to have that many failures and stay employed. Some people should be washed out.
I don’t disagree. I had a conversation with a new hire recently that “traditionally” training was (and still is at the next level) cooperate and graduate. Not the hand hold you see at the regional level. He was dumbfounded that you couldn’t just “train till you felt good.”

It’s not just an XJT problem. To take it to an extreme look at when colgan was desperate for pilots. Now all regionals are.
Punkpilot48 is offline  
Old 04-05-2018, 08:05 PM
  #36  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Sep 2014
Posts: 828
Default

Originally Posted by Itsajob View Post
I find it troubling that the ones that can’t keep up are able to stay. I don’t want them flying my family around. We were all new at one time but I have never heard of being able to have that many failures and stay employed. Some people should be washed out.
You now find this is the issue at every regional. They are all doing all they can to get a pilot through.
Hou757 is offline  
Old 04-05-2018, 08:07 PM
  #37  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Punkpilot48's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Dec 2005
Position: Jungle Jet
Posts: 364
Default

Originally Posted by Blackhawk View Post
So far I have not had any issues with FOs on the line being able to fly, but I’m on the CRJ side and we don’t see new hires any more. Heck, it’s a rare day I fly with an actual FO. Normally it’s a four striper.
Instructor moral seems pretty low. Last AQP was pretty depressing. Of course these are senior guys who put their hearts and souls into supporting DAL for years and don’t even get to keep their retiree pass benefits they were promised. Kind of feels like your wife has run off with your younger neighbor and cleaned out you bank account in the process.
Eh. It’s the same old story. You get good Newbies that try to learn then you get the ones who can’t fly talking about direct entry captain positions.
Punkpilot48 is offline  
Old 04-05-2018, 08:32 PM
  #38  
Banned
 
Joined APC: Mar 2018
Posts: 1,358
Default

Originally Posted by Hou757 View Post
You now find this is the issue at every regional. They are all doing all they can to get a pilot through.
Do these pilots think that they have a future in a world where training records follow you? I can’t imagine a LCC or major airline regardless of if it is an off the street interview or some type of CPP deal looking at an applicant who has had multiple repeat sims or especially 100 hours of IOE needed just to pass and saying that they will do. Busting a private pilot ride 15 years ago or having one bad day in the sim can be explained, but how does an applicant to a major expect that they have a chance with that kind of record? Hopefully all of the mainline airlines will be forced to bring more flying in house because of this. I was really hoping that the guy that I was talking to was full of it. Glad you’re getting some good ones, but it sounds like there is an unacceptable number of bad ones too. The problem is that they are not being fired and sent home. If the flying public knew about this the legacy companies would have a mess on their hands.
Itsajob is offline  
Old 04-05-2018, 09:58 PM
  #39  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Nov 2015
Posts: 104
Default

Originally Posted by Itsajob View Post
Do these pilots think that they have a future in a world where training records follow you? I can’t imagine a LCC or major airline regardless of if it is an off the street interview or some type of CPP deal looking at an applicant who has had multiple repeat sims or especially 100 hours of IOE needed just to pass and saying that they will do. Busting a private pilot ride 15 years ago or having one bad day in the sim can be explained, but how does an applicant to a major expect that they have a chance with that kind of record? Hopefully all of the mainline airlines will be forced to bring more flying in house because of this. I was really hoping that the guy that I was talking to was full of it. Glad you’re getting some good ones, but it sounds like there is an unacceptable number of bad ones too. The problem is that they are not being fired and sent home. If the flying public knew about this the legacy companies would have a mess on their hands.
Ah...even if the legacies do bring flying in house, will better pilots magically appear? Anyhow, the legacies need their C scale/outsourced flying; how else can they keep paying their A scale pilots? Granted the C scale rate is increasing, but it’s no where near what an A scale would demand. Put your family on a LCC, they aren’t hiring pulse pilots yet, and they still wash out weakness regularly. Think about it; through the CPP, United is vetting its outsourced labor. The pilots they evaluate unsatisfactory are sent back to the left seat of a jet they possibly own, but outsource. The public/jury may find it hard to understand why something happened on a flight with a pilot United vetted unworthy to be a 737 FO, but a ok to Captain a 175.
CLRtoPush is offline  
Old 04-06-2018, 04:49 AM
  #40  
Gets Weekends Off
 
andili61's Avatar
 
Joined APC: May 2013
Position: Flaps & Ldg Gear Executive Director
Posts: 100
Default

[QUOTE=Punkpilot48;2565989]ExpressJet announced its greatness today: we go to Jackson Hole now! Problems solved!

Don't forget female pilots on ERJ now can wear the same pilot shirts as United's female Pilots. Huge announcement
andili61 is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
wrxsteve
Pilot Health
2
06-29-2017 07:15 PM
JohnLocke
Regional
13
01-29-2014 05:19 AM
beechking
Republic Airways
170
06-08-2013 06:07 AM
Boneman
ExpressJet
16
12-10-2009 09:04 PM
skypine27
Cargo
2
08-07-2007 03:04 AM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices