L-ASA (ExpressJet CRJ side)
12-14-2016, 07:36 AM
#21
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Oct 2015
Posts: 749
Originally Posted by Happyflyer
Are you counting the 12 700s going to be operated for AA? I assume they are coming from the endless 700's Skywest has coming off the United side.
12-14-2016, 07:45 AM
#22
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Nov 2011
Posts: 218
Originally Posted by NotMrNiceGuy
... you're more than likely assuming that all of the CRJ-200's listed were flying for Delta. That is inaccurate. Twelve (or thirteen) along with a spare are flying for American. Subtract those from the forty-six number and you get closer to thirty-two.
12-14-2016, 07:54 AM
#23
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Oct 2015
Posts: 749
Originally Posted by AceyCandler
...So, I assume all CR2s and the AA op will be replaced with CR7s.
12-16-2016, 06:31 AM
#24
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Mar 2013
Posts: 274
Originally Posted by amcnd
Bigger problem is L-XJT side is also reducing it's fleet. So question will all newhire classes and interviews, job fairs be canceled..??..
12-16-2016, 08:01 AM
#26
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Mar 2013
Posts: 274
Originally Posted by Bozo
No. In fact as of yesterday balls to the wall.
12-16-2016, 08:05 AM
#27
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Oct 2015
Posts: 749
Originally Posted by New Guy 007
O.K. thanks for responding, but I am slightly confused. A few posts back, someone mentioned something about mass attrition, if they are getting rid of the 200's and folks are leaving, why the need for increased hiring?
I can't speak for the poster, but I think he was remarking in sarcastic hyperbole.
All bets are off at this point. The only news is that we are losing 37 CRJ-200's. No news yet on aircraft to replace them. That being the case, it is highly unlikely that there is any need for new pilots. No official word from the hiring department though.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
12-16-2016, 08:21 AM
#28
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Mar 2013
Posts: 274
Originally Posted by NotMrNiceGuy
I can't speak for the poster, but I think he was remarking in sarcastic hyperbole.
All bets are off at this point. The only news is that we are losing 37 CRJ-200's. No news yet on aircraft to replace them. That being the case, it is highly unlikely that there is any need for new pilots. No official word from the hiring department though.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
All bets are off at this point. The only news is that we are losing 37 CRJ-200's. No news yet on aircraft to replace them. That being the case, it is highly unlikely that there is any need for new pilots. No official word from the hiring department though.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
12-16-2016, 08:26 AM
#29
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Oct 2015
Posts: 749
Originally Posted by New Guy 007
I didn't mean to come across as sarcastic, it just one person is saying it's balls to the walls, and you are saying you do not think there is going to be a need for new hires. Sorry!
Sorry. I wasn't saying that you (New Guy 007) were being sarcastic. I thought the other poster (Bozo) was being sarcastic.
My assessment is that with the only news being reported is that we are losing aircraft, it doesn't make sense to hire. It's just what I have deduced. OTOH, I am just a cog in the system. I don't know anything that is privileged information.
That being said, I just got a text from a friend that said the hiring department was informed to keep hiring. So there's that...
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
12-16-2016, 08:31 AM
#30
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Mar 2013
Posts: 274
Originally Posted by NotMrNiceGuy
Sorry. I wasn't saying that you (New Guy 007) were being sarcastic. I thought the other poster (Bozo) was being sarcastic.
My assessment is that with the only news being reported is that we are losing aircraft, it doesn't make sense to hire. It's just what I have deduced. OTOH, I am just a cog in the system. I don't know anything that is privileged information.
That being said, I just got a text from a friend that said the hiring department was informed to keep hiring. So there's that...
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
My assessment is that with the only news being reported is that we are losing aircraft, it doesn't make sense to hire. It's just what I have deduced. OTOH, I am just a cog in the system. I don't know anything that is privileged information.
That being said, I just got a text from a friend that said the hiring department was informed to keep hiring. So there's that...
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
