L-ASA (ExpressJet CRJ side)
#31
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Jul 2012
Posts: 503
Likes: 0
I can't speak for the poster, but I think he was remarking in sarcastic hyperbole.
All bets are off at this point. The only news is that we are losing 37 CRJ-200's. No news yet on aircraft to replace them. That being the case, it is highly unlikely that there is any need for new pilots. No official word from the hiring department though.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
All bets are off at this point. The only news is that we are losing 37 CRJ-200's. No news yet on aircraft to replace them. That being the case, it is highly unlikely that there is any need for new pilots. No official word from the hiring department though.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
#32
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Jul 2012
Posts: 503
Likes: 0
Sorry. I wasn't saying that you (New Guy 007) were being sarcastic. I thought the other poster (Bozo) was being sarcastic.
My assessment is that with the only news being reported is that we are losing aircraft, it doesn't make sense to hire. It's just what I have deduced. OTOH, I am just a cog in the system. I don't know anything that is privileged information.
That being said, I just got a text from a friend that said the hiring department was informed to keep hiring. So there's that...
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
My assessment is that with the only news being reported is that we are losing aircraft, it doesn't make sense to hire. It's just what I have deduced. OTOH, I am just a cog in the system. I don't know anything that is privileged information.
That being said, I just got a text from a friend that said the hiring department was informed to keep hiring. So there's that...
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
#33
Line Holder
Joined: Oct 2015
Posts: 831
Likes: 68
I said I wasn't speaking for you. I was trying to interpret what you said. There weren't any specifics, so I had to guess. Not trying to pick a fight, but your post was vague.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
#35
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Jul 2008
Posts: 4,301
Likes: 2
#37
Banned
Joined: Apr 2014
Posts: 1,291
Likes: 0
Only because they know it's about to be a mass exodus. They are just trying to stay ahead of it,that's all.Loosing aircraft with no replacement means less pilots needed.......period.
#38
Banned
Joined: Apr 2014
Posts: 1,291
Likes: 0
It's really sad to see what has become of AWAC and XJT. They used to be the best regionals to work for.In a few years neither one will probably exist, or if they do it will only be at a much smaller scale. It's sad to see.
#39
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Oct 2016
Posts: 336
Likes: 0
It's all smoke and mirrors. They upgrade and hire, but the numbers are single digits or low double digits when they do either. If they stop hiring or upgrading, then those on property might see that they are closing the doors.
If they truly wanted to hire, then they would give a bonus like almost every other airline. They would have 26 or more in a class like we used to have.
Again, its all smoke and mirrors. Just keep rearranging the deck chairs guys. It's all good.
If they truly wanted to hire, then they would give a bonus like almost every other airline. They would have 26 or more in a class like we used to have.
Again, its all smoke and mirrors. Just keep rearranging the deck chairs guys. It's all good.
#40
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 629
Likes: 0
From: Reclined seat
I did hear that from G.W., he said they are still strongly considering the FO pay raises and other retention ideas. I've expressed to management over and over again, that the longer they wait, the deeper hole they will need to dig out of. It may come to a point to where the hole starts to fill with water and we can never recover. I personally have given the company up until the end of Feb to make an announcement before I explore making a lateral move, or going somewhere else.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post



