![]() |
Or it could just be a big conspiracy. I'll let you decide. |
Originally Posted by Sluggo_63
(Post 3287438)
To be fair, it probably has a lot to do with the fact that most people are doing things in the last two years the prevent flu spread that they've never done before during flu season. Things like wearing masks, washing and sanitizing your hands, standing farther apart, staying home if they weren't feeling well, not traveling, etc.
Or it could just be a big conspiracy. I'll let you decide. |
Originally Posted by magic rat
(Post 3287366)
Yummy side affects. Sign me up!
How is the FAA allowing this vaccine for pilots considering the side effects…which I think are more harmful to ones ability to maintain a class I? |
Originally Posted by Rock
(Post 3287229)
This is why some people still believe the vaccine makes them immune to COVID. They simply can’t keep up.
The discussion involved a study specifically about people who had COVID once and then got it a second time. Zero died. Conversely, Merle Haggard said 1.3% of COVID deaths are people who were vaccinated. That is great for the folks who survived the first round..not so good for the folks that didn’t…hopefully the goal is to prevent deaths the first round. |
It should be mandated by FedEx so I can move up a dozen or so slots in seniority.
|
Originally Posted by Globemaster2827
(Post 3287217)
Get ready for all the super neato internet scientist "Research" articles... The bottom line is that that consequences for the "Personal Decisions" are coming. Your body. Your choice. Your consequences.
That would be great if everyone had that mindset. But unfortunately we have some that are more on the authoritarian side of the spectrum.
Originally Posted by Rock
(Post 3287208)
I will probably get the shingles vaccine this year if that makes vaccine people happy. How do you reconcile this with your COVID vaccine stance, specifically the risks of disease versus the risk of not being vaccinated?
Originally Posted by JustAGuy
(Post 3287165)
Herd immunity saves the llives of those people who are allergic to the contents of vaccines.
Do people actually know if they are allergic before taking the vaccine? How many are allergic that are in the high risk category? How much liberty should by taken from everyone for this amount of people?
Originally Posted by Merle Haggard
(Post 3287250)
That leaves 98.7% of deaths in the unvaccinated. So if you haven’t already had either the vaccine or a case of COVID, how is it sensible for the company, the country, your family or your life and/or health insurer to support being unvaxxed?
It’s sensible because people should have the freedom to decide what to put in their bodies and take risks they are willing to take.
Originally Posted by Sluggo_63
(Post 3287438)
To be fair, it probably has a lot to do with the fact that most people are doing things in the last two years that prevent flu spread that they've never done before during flu season. Things like wearing masks, washing and sanitizing your hands, standing farther apart, staying home if they weren't feeling well, not traveling, etc.
Or it could just be a big conspiracy. I'll let you decide. But none of those mitigations have prevented COVID spread…yet it’s worked on influenza. Could there be a third alternative? |
Originally Posted by Fr8Master
(Post 3287633)
It should be mandated by FedEx so I can move up a dozen or so slots in seniority.
|
I’m just ready for the Fox News watching boomer captains to put their money where their mouth is and retire already once it’s mandatory.
|
Originally Posted by Merle Haggard
(Post 3287250)
That leaves 98.7% of deaths in the unvaccinated. So if you haven’t already had either the vaccine or a case of COVID, how is it sensible for the company, the country, your family or your life and/or health insurer to support being unvaxxed?
|
Originally Posted by Hacker15e
(Post 3287739)
By this logic, why should any of those entities support any people with the comorbidites that are the actual underlying causes of death for most of these fatal COVID cases, vaccinated or not?
|
Originally Posted by Sluggo_63
(Post 3287438)
To be fair, it probably has a lot to do with the fact that most people are doing things in the last two years that prevent flu spread that they've never done before during flu season. Things like wearing masks, washing and sanitizing your hands, standing farther apart, staying home if they weren't feeling well, not traveling, etc.
Or it could just be a big conspiracy. I'll let you decide. |
|
Come on, don’t ya know the flu is way down because everyone is wearing a mask and social distancing, but COVID numbers have been up because…no one is wearing a mask and social distancing.
|
Originally Posted by magic rat
(Post 3287832)
Wow! So if we wash our hands and social distance, we can cure cancer too?
|
Originally Posted by Sluggo_63
(Post 3287869)
This is probably the most idiotic thing I’ve seen posted on the internet. And that’s saying a lot.
|
Dr. Fauci wrote a paper after a study was conducted by the NIH in the mid-'90s, that stated that masks could not stop the spread of SARS-Covid type viruses. If you remember he stated this at the beginning of the pandemic, and he cited his own work on it as proof. Then something magical happened where paper masks could now stop the spread of a virus that is nearly 100 microns smaller than the filtration capacity of the masks. In the paper he wrote, it was stated that the biggest danger from masks comes from the virus being aerosolized by the mask. The droplets do not pass on the infection through the skin, but the vapor inhaled into the lungs or introduced to the eyes does. That is why over 70% of all covid cases occur to people who always wear masks and are always with people who wear them. Those people prove Fauci's research is accurate.
The reason the flu numbers are down is because of the decisions made by the CDC on how to interpret test results. The most common form of testing that we've used since the onset, can not differentiate between Covid, Flu, or the common cold. It only proves that you have one of a few various types of coronavirus or other viruses, but not necessarily covid. The CDC determined that all positive tests would be treated as a positive for covid. They announced in early August that this form of testing would be outlawed by Dec 31, 2021. The CDC is requiring a new test that can differentiate between covid and the other viruses by that date. That is the reason no one got the flu because all positive tests were registered as covid. Have you ever wondered how some folks test positive while not having any covid symptoms, or they say it felt like a cold? Well, it might have been a cold, or one of the other viruses that could cause the test to show positive. We might as well all wear tinfoil hats along with the masks, as they are about as scientifically beneficial to stopping the spread as the masks are. |
Originally Posted by flyguy23
(Post 3287865)
Come on, don’t ya know the flu is way down because everyone is wearing a mask and social distancing, but COVID numbers have been up because…no one is wearing a mask and social distancing.
|
Originally Posted by urinmyseat
(Post 3287932)
Dr. Fauci wrote a paper after a study was conducted by the NIH in the mid-'90s, that stated that masks could not stop the spread of SARS-Covid type viruses. If you remember he stated this at the beginning of the pandemic, and he cited his own work on it as proof. Then something magical happened where paper masks could now stop the spread of a virus that is nearly 100 microns smaller than the filtration capacity of the masks. In the paper he wrote, it was stated that the biggest danger from masks comes from the virus being aerosolized by the mask. The droplets do not pass on the infection through the skin, but the vapor inhaled into the lungs or introduced to the eyes does. That is why over 70% of all covid cases occur to people who always wear masks and are always with people who wear them. Those people prove Fauci's research is accurate.
The reason the flu numbers are down is because of the decisions made by the CDC on how to interpret test results. The most common form of testing that we've used since the onset, can not differentiate between Covid, Flu, or the common cold. It only proves that you have one of a few various types of coronavirus or other viruses, but not necessarily covid. The CDC determined that all positive tests would be treated as a positive for covid. They announced in early August that this form of testing would be outlawed by Dec 31, 2021. The CDC is requiring a new test that can differentiate between covid and the other viruses by that date. That is the reason no one got the flu because all positive tests were registered as covid. Have you ever wondered how some folks test positive while not having any covid symptoms, or they say it felt like a cold? Well, it might have been a cold, or one of the other viruses that could cause the test to show positive. We might as well all wear tinfoil hats along with the masks, as they are about as scientifically beneficial to stopping the spread as the masks are. |
Originally Posted by urinmyseat
(Post 3287932)
Dr. Fauci…
TLDR We might as well all wear tinfoil hats along with the masks, as they are about as scientifically beneficial to stopping the spread as the masks are. |
Ever think that maybe there is less flu because ivermectin.
|
Originally Posted by Fr8Master
(Post 3288085)
Ever think that maybe there is less flu because ivermectin.
|
Originally Posted by G550av8or
(Post 3286160)
What about those who have had Covid and recovered? Many countries accept that in lue of vaccination status. It appears to be an argument between being vax’ed and unvax’ed, with zero consideration to those that have had it. What say you ALPA?
Just throw in Ivermectin and HCQ for good measure. Any other code words I missed to get the brigade riled up? :) Edit: I popped off without reading the rest of this oh so exciting thread. Lots of Dr. 's and some nurses too. Anyway, good on you for jumping in so early. I can't believe you didn't get blasted. |
Originally Posted by BlueAvi8tor
(Post 3288089)
I don’t think a horse dewormer is in any way related to the flu.
"Given ivermectin’s longstanding record of clinical applications and FDA-approved status, repurposing of this drug for the treatment of IAV should be considered, especially while under threat of pandemic IAV outbreak." And no, I won't provide a link. Google it yourself. :) |
The Delta (airline not variant) boys and gals beat this horse to death. Kept beating it. Then the mods buried it. So they dug it back up, gave it a new name, and started beating it again! It may have even happened another time. Best course would be to just keep all your dumb opinions to yourself. Nobody cares. Or we can keep pulling each other off back and forth with the same old tired arguments.
|
Originally Posted by Merle Haggard
(Post 3285108)
This needs to go to the Covid 19 thread so that all the same old arguments can happen there.
Bottom line is that we are very likely going to be flying to places that require it. Their country, their rules. When that happens it will ultimately force the company's hand. |
I was hoping the discussion would be centered around what y’all think fdx would do and your opinions as to how you will proceed accordingly. But I got suckered into the debate. We need another thread! Call it Pilots vs FDX vaccine stance.
|
Originally Posted by magic rat
(Post 3288253)
I was hoping the discussion would be centered around what y’all think fdx would do and your opinions as to how you will proceed accordingly. But I got suckered into the debate. We need another thread! Call it Pilots vs FDX vaccine stance.
|
Dont think the company will make it mandatory. Once they make it mandatory i think you enter a gray area with adverse side effects and liability. Right now if you get vaccine...well it was your choice.
|
Originally Posted by magic rat
(Post 3288253)
I was hoping the discussion would be centered around what y’all think fdx would do and your opinions as to how you will proceed accordingly. But I got suckered into the debate. We need another thread! Call it Pilots vs FDX vaccine stance.
This needs to go to the Covid 19 thread so that all the same old arguments can happen there. Bottom line is that we are very likely going to be flying to places that require it. Their country, their rules. When that happens it will ultimately force the company's hand. Pilots can be "vs FDX" as much as they like. It won't and can't change anything above. As for me, there is no "Pilot vs. FedEx". I'm vaccinated on the advice of my doctor. I will get boosters on the advice of my doctor, whom I have trusted for years with far more serious decisions than whether or not to take a vaccine. He also happens to be an AME and the health officer for a large corporation. I haven't seen a keyboard commando with adequate credentials for me to re-rack their advice over his. And hey, if you don't trust him, 96% of US doctors were vaccinated as of 1 June. I'll get my flying advice from pilots and my medical advice from doctors. I'll add one final thought. FDX pays Harvey Watt a bunch of money for medical consultation and their advice will probably come from (drumroll please)............DOCTORS |
Originally Posted by Merle Haggard
(Post 3288447)
OK, updated version:
This needs to go to the Covid 19 thread so that all the same old arguments can happen there. Bottom line is that we are very likely going to be flying to places that require it. Their country, their rules. When that happens it will ultimately force the company's hand. Pilots can be "vs FDX" as much as they like. It won't and can't change anything above. As for me, there is no "Pilot vs. FedEx". I'm vaccinated on the advice of my doctor. I will get boosters on the advice of my doctor, whom I have trusted for years with far more serious decisions than whether or not to take a vaccine. He also happens to be an AME and the health officer for a large corporation. I haven't seen a keyboard commando with adequate credentials for me to re-rack their advice over his. And hey, if you don't trust him, 96% of US doctors were vaccinated as of 1 June. I'll get my flying advice from pilots and my medical advice from doctors. I'll add one final thought. FDX pays Harvey Watt a bunch of money for medical consultation and their advice will probably come from (drumroll please)............ |
Originally Posted by USMCFDX
(Post 3288462)
Fixed it for you
“So I read some biased article I found in my favorite echo chamber that supports my position. I am now an expert in [insert topic]” ~Random Pilot/Lawyer |
Listening to your doctor is ridiculous. I take all my medical advice from the internet, then when I go to my doctor I impress him with how much more I know than he does about everything. I can tell he feels like an idiot for going to Med School at Johns Hopkins when all he needed to do was Google everything. What a chump.
|
Originally Posted by USMCFDX
(Post 3288462)
Fixed it for you
|
https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2021-08-28/antibodies-waning-the-immune-system-has-a-backup-plan-for-that
Interesting read on natural immunity vs vaccine protection (not immunity) and how each changes over time. Draw your own conclusions “ Wherry’s group found that memory B cells generated by the mRNA vaccines made by Moderna Inc. and Pfizer Inc. and its partner BioNTech SE appeared better at blocking virus variants including alpha, beta and delta, than those produced in response to a mild case of Covid-19.” Above is what happens in breakthrough cases after full immunity has “worn off” |
Originally Posted by Globemaster2827
(Post 3287959)
Flu season is in the winter when people were wearing masks and socially distancing. We didn't do much of that over the spring and summer because of vaccination rates lowering transmission. Then the Delta variant hit. So now masks and maybe social distancing are back until we can get ahold of this thing... Just in time for flu season. It's not a very complicated concept. If we socially distance this winter and wear masks there will be less flu.
Flattening the curve isn’t a very complicated concept either yet that mysteriously went away. |
Originally Posted by FXLAX
(Post 3289561)
Flattening the curve isn’t a very complicated concept either yet that mysteriously went away.
|
Im not sure why this is even a debate. The courts have already ruled. Like it or not its legal for the employers to mandate it. From that point forward personal opinion doesn’t matter. What am I missing?
|
Originally Posted by Merle Haggard
(Post 3289580)
That's because everyone who was willing or interested in flattening the curve is vaccinated at this point.
I’m referring to leadership, the Fauci’s, if you will. The flattened curve no longer seems to matter anymore, evidence by their lack of mentioning it. |
Originally Posted by Noworkallplay
(Post 3289995)
Im not sure why this is even a debate. The courts have already ruled. Like it or not its legal for the employers to mandate it. From that point forward personal opinion doesn’t matter. What am I missing?
I believe a case is working it’s way up through the courts presently. So it’s yet to be determined. |
Originally Posted by FXLAX
(Post 3290003)
I believe a case is working it’s way up through the courts presently. So it’s yet to be determined.
|
| All times are GMT -8. The time now is 09:17 PM. |
Website Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands