![]() |
Vaccine Stance
Originally Posted by Globemaster2827
(Post 3290013)
Just because someone sues doesn't really mean anything. ACB refused to hear it as recently as June. The bottom line is that if someone is suing then it will get thrown out of court. Here's ALPA's legal summary on the matter for you. As many doctors as we've got around here I'm betting we have just as many lawyers though... http://fdx.alpa.org/portals/26/docs/...%208-16-21.pdf
I believe ACB only refuse to hear it before it works it way up the normal way. The suit is still in the courts. I’m not saying it’s going to be successfully, chances are it’s not. I’m just saying that we haven’t heard the last word on it. Unless you can provide a link that shows the trial court and appeals court have adjudicated it? |
Originally Posted by FXLAX
(Post 3290153)
I believe ACB only refuse to hear it before it works it way up the normal way. The suit is still in the courts. I’m not saying it’s going to be successfully, chances are it’s not. I’m just saying that we haven’t heard the last word on it. Unless you can provide a link that shows the trial court and appeals court have adjudicated it?
|
Vaccine Stance
Originally Posted by Globemaster2827
(Post 3290170)
I'm reading this article as the suit that the students filed is dead but they'll continue filing (frivolous) suits in an attempt to end the mandate on different grounds. It's 100% true that the courts have spoken on the matter. If our pilots due the same they'll be wasting their money and possibly costing themselves their jobs. https://www.cnn.com/2021/08/12/polit...ate/index.html
It doesn’t surprise me that your particular source left out facts. ACB merely denied an emergency injunction. The case now has to proceed in the lower courts with plaintiffs arguing on the merits while the mandate is in effect. Like I said, it’s probably going to fail seeing as the injunction was not allowed but it’s certainly not a dead issue. And therefore the courts still have a say in it. https://www.jurist.org/news/2021/08/...ccine-mandate/ To be clear, current case law allows these mandates, unless something changes that. I’m not trying to say otherwise. I was just trying to point out that the current case is still alive. |
Originally Posted by FXLAX
(Post 3290002)
I’m referring to leadership, the Fauci’s, if you will. The flattened curve no longer seems to matter anymore, evidence by their lack of mentioning it.
|
Nailed it. I'm surprised that the non-specific PCR test decertification did not get more widespread traction.
It can be argued that this entire psychological operation hinged on the high cycle threshold thus leading to false positives, which leads to innacurate death data (with vs from). Sent from my SM-G970U1 using Tapatalk |
Originally Posted by urinmyseat
(Post 3287932)
Dr. Fauci wrote a paper after a study was conducted by the NIH in the mid-'90s, that stated that masks could not stop the spread of SARS-Covid type viruses. If you remember he stated this at the beginning of the pandemic, and he cited his own work on it as proof. Then something magical happened where paper masks could now stop the spread of a virus that is nearly 100 microns smaller than the filtration capacity of the masks. In the paper he wrote, it was stated that the biggest danger from masks comes from the virus being aerosolized by the mask. The droplets do not pass on the infection through the skin, but the vapor inhaled into the lungs or introduced to the eyes does. That is why over 70% of all covid cases occur to people who always wear masks and are always with people who wear them. Those people prove Fauci's research is accurate.
The reason the flu numbers are down is because of the decisions made by the CDC on how to interpret test results. The most common form of testing that we've used since the onset, can not differentiate between Covid, Flu, or the common cold. It only proves that you have one of a few various types of coronavirus or other viruses, but not necessarily covid. The CDC determined that all positive tests would be treated as a positive for covid. They announced in early August that this form of testing would be outlawed by Dec 31, 2021. The CDC is requiring a new test that can differentiate between covid and the other viruses by that date. That is the reason no one got the flu because all positive tests were registered as covid. Have you ever wondered how some folks test positive while not having any covid symptoms, or they say it felt like a cold? Well, it might have been a cold, or one of the other viruses that could cause the test to show positive. We might as well all wear tinfoil hats along with the masks, as they are about as scientifically beneficial to stopping the spread as the masks are. It can be argued that this entire psychological operation hinged on the high cycle threshold thus leading to false positives, which leads to innacurate death data (with vs from). Sent from my SM-G970U1 using Tapatalk Sent from my SM-G970U1 using Tapatalk |
I have no idea what the company is planning regarding the vaccine and so can't speculate. I will add that personally, I will never need the vaccine. I have over a 99% chance of survival from this virus. Most of the crew force has a 99% of survival. My natural immunity is top notch. Most everyone else who I fly with has, in general, excellent health habits. Subtracting the nights everyone lets loose and ordering too much catering. :) 99% chance is better than walking across a golf course holding a nine iron above your head during a thunderstorm and not being struck by lightning.
The CDC has already admitted they "fibbed" about the PCR test. The CDC has also admitted that the death number that is stated on their website is 95% false. What I mean is that 95% of the death number had preexisting comorbidities, i.e., they were sick already. The vaccines are already showing signs of efficiency loss, to say the least. The flu vaccine has an efficiency of 38% from 2004 to the present. I seriously doubt that this vaccine, created in six months and still experimental, has a higher efficiency. You already see the push for booster shots coming. Probably every 5 months for the rest of your life. Boy, does that sound enjoyable. These vaccines were also created by companies that were handed the largest criminal fine in history, at the time, $2.3 Billion. I would say that believing that getting the vaccine will somehow solve all or most of your problems is extremely naïve. This whole affair for the past year and a half has been a shxx show. The facts, while very interesting most of the time, are irrelevant lately. Some people run around like chickens with their heads cut off slinging stuff at everyone within a certain radius. I seriously hope and pray that individuals in our crew force don't start having any type of health issues over the next couple years. I don't need a doctor to tell me anything about the vaccine. All I had to do was read the list of side effects. Over 100, btw. Most doctors have no idea what the VAERS website is even about. The vaccine adverse event reporting. More reactions from these vaccines in the last year than from all vaccines combined. Yikes. The Australian politician lately is a classic. He took the vaccine to prove its effectiveness and developed Bells Palsy on live tv. He then went in for the second shot with an eye patch. Think Australian pirate. What other fashion accessory can he add after this second dose? |
Originally Posted by Merle Haggard
(Post 3290760)
I’m sure the “leadership” also understands that the remaining unvaccinated folks are predominantly those that won’t care about anything they say. Vaccination is the best way to flatten the curve as it curbs hospitalization more than any other factor. Why waste time trying to squeeze blood from a turnip?
I agree and it’s been flattened, thanks to the vaccine. Yet we still have mask mandates. There will always be people who won’t get the COVID vaccine. So unless we want to be an authoritative or fascistic or dictatorial, we will have to suffice with the current flattening of the curve. |
Originally Posted by FXLAX
(Post 3291670)
I agree and it’s been flattened, thanks to the vaccine. Yet we still have mask mandates. There will always be people who won’t get the COVID vaccine. So unless we want to be an authoritative or fascistic or dictatorial, we will have to suffice with the current flattening of the curve.
Boy, it sure is serious business around here with that oh so sweet air of moral superiority. Maybe we should talk about the latest Ben and Jerry flavors or something. Here I'll start, Salty tears, Holy cannoli your dead, Tennessee Mud spike protein, This is Nuts booster shot, Fears and Cheers fudge tracks, Natural Immunity Nutello, Ivermectin Ice cream sandwich and my favorite, Self Righteous Magnum crunch. Hopefully none of these flavors end up in the Ben and Jerry's Flavor Graveyard too soon. I know, I'm poking a rattle snake with a stick. But hey, if your stick is long enough it's pretty fun sometimes. :) |
"I will never need the vaccine. I have over a 99% chance of survival from this virus."
My wife's hospital has five children on ventilators right now. UAB Children's, Birmingham Alabama. I bet some of the five were infected by people who said the same thing. |
The company will require the vaccine, and countries will make you quarantine anyway. (cue Nelson: Ah-ha!)
|
Originally Posted by Huck
(Post 3291994)
"I will never need the vaccine. I have over a 99% chance of survival from this virus."
My wife's hospital has five children on ventilators right now. UAB Children's, Birmingham Alabama. I bet some of the five were infected by people who said the same thing. 6 Kids are much more at risk from seasonal influenza than COVID. I doubt there are five kids on ventilators in one hospital at one time. The data doesn't support that claim. (Chart updated Sep 1st) Regardless of that claim, what is your point about vaccines since they do not prevent transmission? The world has gone mad. https://uploads.tapatalk-cdn.com/202...45d1d0593d.jpg Sent from my SM-G970U1 using Tapatalk |
Originally Posted by Huck
(Post 3291994)
"I will never need the vaccine. I have over a 99% chance of survival from this virus."
My wife's hospital has five children on ventilators right now. UAB Children's, Birmingham Alabama. I bet some of the five were infected by people who said the same thing. I see what you did there. Sneaky. Pull the heart strings and attack the character. I'm not holding up a rod and shouting at G or anything. I say this with all humility and I hope all of your family fully recover. I'm stating that after 70 plus negative test, like most around here, a healthy immune system, like most around here, that I have a 99% of surviving this virus. I push vitamins C, D and zinc and have access to noble prize winning ivermectin. So why would I fill my temple with something where I can still catch and spread this virus and that has over 100 side effects? Edit: I misread your statement. Ah, your saying people like me infected your children. Ok. Your aware that individuals that are vaccinated carry the same or higher viral load of covid than non-vaccinated individuals right? Oh, and please add a booster or two. That will just increase your viral load. |
Originally Posted by Flaps50MaxBrake
(Post 3291978)
Hey Lax,
Boy, it sure is serious business around here with that oh so sweet air of moral superiority. Maybe we should talk about the latest Ben and Jerry flavors or something. Here I'll start, Salty tears, Holy cannoli your dead, Tennessee Mud spike protein, This is Nuts booster shot, Fears and Cheers fudge tracks, Natural Immunity Nutello, Ivermectin Ice cream sandwich and my favorite, Self Righteous Magnum crunch. Hopefully none of these flavors end up in the Ben and Jerry's Flavor Graveyard too soon. I know, I'm poking a rattle snake with a stick. But hey, if your stick is long enough it's pretty fun sometimes. :) I agree. Those collectivist who want to force everyone else to conform to their idea what they think is best should lower a notch or two on their level of superiority. |
Dude man here's the article...
https://www.cbs42.com/news/health/co...e-to-covid-19/ You called my wife a liar so I'm out. Eventually the kid in the playground with the hockey helmet on ends up all by himself.... |
Originally Posted by FXLAX
(Post 3292037)
I agree. Those collectivist who want to force everyone else to conform to their idea what they think is best should lower a notch or two on their level of superiority.
My posts have been minimal because there hasn't been anything worth saying. I've sat around and read the wild bunch here proclaim and exclaim for years. All pretty much for naught and most a steaming pile of ____. Figured it was time to pipe in after reading this thread. If I'm wrong I'll state so. Here and anywhere else, crew room or airplane. Pokin' you was in jest, of course. If you need an apology, just say. |
Originally Posted by Huck
(Post 3291994)
"I will never need the vaccine. I have over a 99% chance of survival from this virus."
My wife's hospital has five children on ventilators right now. UAB Children's, Birmingham Alabama. I bet some of the five were infected by people who said the same thing. Not enough information. Why are they on ventilators? Is it from COVID? If so, are these kids vaccinated? How old are they? Do they have comorbidities? If they weren’t vaccinated, why? Should others be forced to inject something into their bodies against their will for the supposedly benefit of those who voluntarily had the injection? Or should it be for the benefit of those who don’t want to be injected? If people don’t want to be injected suffer the posible consequences of their choice? |
Vaccine Stance
Originally Posted by Flaps50MaxBrake
(Post 3292053)
No way brother or sister. For freedom here and definitely not superior to any.
My posts have been minimal because there hasn't been anything worth saying. I've sat around and read the wild bunch here proclaim and exclaim for years. All pretty much for naught and most a steaming pile of ____. Figured it was time to pipe in after reading this thread. If I'm wrong I'll state so. Here and anywhere else, crew room or airplane. Pokin' you was in jest, of course. If you need an apology, just say. My reply to you was not meant personally towards you. I was making a general comment to those who believe they should force others to put something in their bodies because their superiority makes them feel that way. So I apologize if I didn’t make it clear that it wasn’t personal. Although your response to it says a lot all by itself.;) But I’ll take it as a compliment (no apology needed) that you chose my post to make one of your rare posts. My point isn’t about being right or wrong. Personally, I think that people should vaccinate, especially if you are one of those at risk. If someone is in the at-risk category and yet decide not to vacante (other than for medical reasons), then I might have the opinion that that is not the best decision. But I still don’t think people should be forced by others to vaccinate just because we think we are better at making decisions for themselves. If one does feel that way, I’ll have the opinion that you need to bring your moral superiority down a few notches. Freedom means people being able to make good and bad decisions on their own. I hope that clears things up. I think we may be in agreement. If not, that is ok too…until forcing people becomes a thing.;) |
Originally Posted by Huck
(Post 3292050)
Dude man here's the article...
https://www.cbs42.com/news/health/co...e-to-covid-19/ You called my wife a liar so I'm out. Eventually the kid in the playground with the hockey helmet on ends up all by himself.... In terms of COVID risk to children. The data is the data, almost 1 in 500,000 which is about the same risk as them getting struck by lightning (lightning risk per CDC). UK Study: https://www.researchsquare.com/article/rs-689684/v1 https://uploads.tapatalk-cdn.com/202...272d1ca5e7.jpghttps://uploads.tapatalk-cdn.com/202...20ef919abd.jpg Sent from my SM-G970U1 using Tapatalk |
Meat fighter…what is your weapon of choice? It has to be a tomahawk ribeye?? Great handle. It gave me a giggle.
|
Lawsuit and fire the MEC
Our MEC has agreed to let the company force vaccines on us already. This is a moot point to argue, the MEC has failed already, you will see in January.
Our MEC has given up our vacation to the company. Our MEC has given up our A-plan to the company. Our MEC gave up our right to bring a lawsuit to the company. We never could strike but at one time we were able to bring a lawsuit. Our MEC gave our contract negotiations to ALPA and signed documents to not talk about it to US, the members. Our MEC has sold us out. If you have balls you will join the lawsuit. Shout out to the four last round who did have the balls and exposed the MEC. Call me whatever you like but when this starts happening in January and the MEC blames the company and say "it snuck in," means they were paid off and asleep at the desk. |
Do you think that ALPA can really stop the company from mandating the vaccine or putting it into the employee handbook or whatever other way they want to put it in writing? I’m not trying to debate whether or not it should be done. But do you really think ALPA can stop them from requiring it?
I still don’t think the company will have to require it. When other countries do, it will become a de facto “company” requirement. and don’t read that as Asia or Europe. Think Canada. I dunno. I’m just a pilot. |
Originally Posted by Spot13
(Post 3292505)
Our MEC has agreed to let the company force vaccines on us already. This is a moot point to argue, the MEC has failed already, you will see in January.
Our MEC has given up our vacation to the company. Our MEC has given up our A-plan to the company. Our MEC gave up our right to bring a lawsuit to the company. We never could strike but at one time we were able to bring a lawsuit. Our MEC gave our contract negotiations to ALPA and signed documents to not talk about it to US, the members. Our MEC has sold us out. If you have balls you will join the lawsuit. Shout out to the four last round who did have the balls and exposed the MEC. Call me whatever you like but when this starts happening in January and the MEC blames the company and say "it snuck in," means they were paid off and asleep at the desk. |
Originally Posted by Spot13
(Post 3292505)
Our MEC has agreed to let the company force vaccines on us already. This is a moot point to argue, the MEC has failed already, you will see in January.
Our MEC has given up our vacation to the company. Our MEC has given up our A-plan to the company. Our MEC gave up our right to bring a lawsuit to the company. We never could strike but at one time we were able to bring a lawsuit. Our MEC gave our contract negotiations to ALPA and signed documents to not talk about it to US, the members. Our MEC has sold us out. If you have balls you will join the lawsuit. Shout out to the four last round who did have the balls and exposed the MEC. Call me whatever you like but when this starts happening in January and the MEC blames the company and say "it snuck in," means they were paid off and asleep at the desk. So there's a sizeable percentage of us that believe it's in our best interests to have everyone vaccinated and don't want to waste resources fighting it. |
Originally Posted by Meat Fighter
(Post 3292011)
You know how many healthy kids under age 18 have died "with" Covid in the UK since February of 2020?
6 Kids are much more at risk from seasonal influenza than COVID. I doubt there are five kids on ventilators in one hospital at one time. The data doesn't support that claim. (Chart updated Sep 1st) Regardless of that claim, what is your point about vaccines since they do not prevent transmission? The world has gone mad. https://uploads.tapatalk-cdn.com/202...45d1d0593d.jpg Sent from my SM-G970U1 using Tapatalk |
Originally Posted by Flaps50MaxBrake
(Post 3292017)
Your aware that individuals that are vaccinated carry the same or higher viral load of covid than non-vaccinated individuals right? Oh, and please add a booster or two. That will just increase your viral load. A vaccinated person is significantly less likely to be infected compared to an unvaccinated individual. There’s no question about that. https://www.healthline.com/health-ne...-Delta-variant So while an infected vaccinated person may spread COVID as much as an unvaccinated person, the vaccinated individual is far less likely to ever catch it in the first place. Finally, the notion that most of our crew force is in amazing physical shape is laughable. Just because some of you were in shape during your years of active service, doesn’t mean you’re still in shape when you’re 50+ years old, sleep deprived, drinking excessively, and eating all the desserts in catering. I’ve flown with tons of guys that fall in that last category. |
If we all get vaccinated and comply they will let us get back to normal and stop covering it on tv 24 hrs a day. Thats the only way to get back to normal.
|
Originally Posted by Flaps50MaxBrake
(Post 3291221)
The Australian politician lately is a classic. He took the vaccine to prove its effectiveness and developed Bells Palsy on live tv. He then went in for the second shot with an eye patch. Think Australian pirate. What other fashion accessory can he add after this second dose? https://www.aap.com.au/politicians-b...lse-diagnosis/ |
Originally Posted by wrxpilot
(Post 3292743)
That did not happen, quit repeating your Facebook talking points here.
https://www.aap.com.au/politicians-b...lse-diagnosis/ Your article says there is no link between Bell's Palsy and the vaccines. This is an outright lie. This isn't an uncommon reaction in vaccines like this. |
Originally Posted by Fm0Bm
(Post 3292752)
Lmao you really believe the debunkers still? You ever look into anything yourself?
Your article says there is no link between Bell's Palsy and the vaccines. This is an outright lie. This isn't an uncommon reaction in vaccines like this. Unless you are getting the Chinese SinoVac, there’s no statistical evidence of your statement: https://www.thelancet.com/journals/l...467-9/fulltext |
Originally Posted by MEMA300
(Post 3292689)
If we all get vaccinated and comply they will let us get back to normal and stop covering it on tv 24 hrs a day. Thats the only way to get back to normal.
This stopped being about medicine, science, and public health right after two weeks to flatten the curve. Since that point the virus has been used as a predicate for control and power. It painfully obvious every step of the way as the goal posts shifts when the latest narrative gets proven wrong and goes down the orwellian memory hole. Can we wake up already from this mass psychosis? Sent from my SM-G970U1 using Tapatalk |
So what are the chances the company allows for those to be tested weekly instead of the government forced jab? I don’t care, I’ll pay for it myself.
|
Originally Posted by Hank Burley
(Post 3292844)
So what are the chances the company allows for those to be tested weekly instead of the government forced jab? I don’t care, I’ll pay for it myself.
|
Originally Posted by coryk
(Post 3292987)
We get government money for the mail contract and also for flying those vaccines. I think the test option goes out the window.
|
16 pages of whinging about what the company may or may not do seems excessive, no?
This is simple the company will do what's in the best interest of its operations and its employees. When a decision is made and if you have a personal objection to that you are under no obligation to continue your employement. Question is how strongly do you feel about it? Your position here is as voluntary as a vaccination. |
Originally Posted by MEMA300
(Post 3292689)
If we all get vaccinated and comply they will let us get back to normal and stop covering it on tv 24 hrs a day. That's the only way to get back to normal.
|
Originally Posted by Adlerdriver
(Post 3293048)
No. "Normal" is stop the stupidity and let nature takes its course. Most who get sick recover and develop natural immunity. A small percentage die which is already happening in spite of the pointless measures being taken. The end result is we live our lives normally. If some want to get vaccinated, fine. I did but only because I thought it would make my life easier. Not because I'm afraid of dying from this. We've already seen getting the shot doesn't stop you from getting it or passing it along. Acting like the vaccination is going to have any measurable affect on this long term is just buying into another version of the same BS. This boogie man has lorded over the world for way too long.
https://www.yalemedicine.org/news/co...ine-comparison I have family that work high up in a large FL hospital system. Their COVID patients are almost exclusively unvaccinated, except in some cases when the vaccinated also have other issues that have compromised their immune systems. |
Originally Posted by wrxpilot
(Post 3293049)
What you’re saying is absolutely incorrect. You are either lazy or are purposely spreading false information.
https://www.yalemedicine.org/news/co...ine-comparison I have family that work high up in a large FL hospital system. Their COVID patients are almost exclusively unvaccinated, except in some cases when the vaccinated also have other issues that have compromised their immune systems. I'm a little fuzzy on what exactly is incorrect. Did I say the vaccine wouldn't benefit some people? No, I did not. If people who get Covid and are not vaccinated require hospitalization, that makes sense if you believe the vaccine proponents. It was supposed to reduce one's chances of hospitalization. But no one every said it was a guarantee from getting it or passing it along to someone else. That's been shown over and over again since the start of the vaccinations. All I said was most people can get sick, not die and develop natural immunity if they choose not to get vaccinated. Their choice. Either one is okay if they don't mind the risk. But the idea that getting the vaccine is somehow going to stop the spread or me getting vaccinated protects YOU is asinine. It's already been shown that a vaccinated person can still get Covid and can still pass it on to someone else. The point I was trying to make is that vaccination is a personal protection measure. It's not some kind of collective effort to make Covid go away. No more than getting a flu shot every year suddenly makes the flu go away. If someone thinks making that choice is somehow going to return us to normalcy, they're in fantasy land. So, what is your point and where, exactly, am I spreading false information. |
Originally Posted by Adlerdriver
(Post 3293056)
So, what is your point and where, exactly, am I spreading false information. The vaccine does make a SIGNIFICANT difference in preventing YOU from catching COVID. It’s not a magic force field preventing all infection, but it does make a very big difference. But the idea that getting the vaccine is somehow going to stop the spread or me getting vaccinated protects YOU is asinine. It's already been shown that a vaccinated person can still get Covid and can still pass it on to someone else. The mRNA vaccines in the US make a very significant difference in preventing transmission of delta COVID. https://www.webmd.com/vaccines/covid...-delta-variant https://www.nytimes.com/2021/08/24/h...infection.html |
Originally Posted by wrxpilot
(Post 3293121)
The vaccine does make a SIGNIFICANT difference in preventing YOU from catching COVID. It’s not a magic force field preventing all infection, but it does make a very big difference.
This is misleading and just flat out incorrect. You keep saying it, but have no idea what you’re talking about. The mRNA vaccines in the US make a very significant difference in preventing transmission of delta COVID. https://www.webmd.com/vaccines/covid...-delta-variant https://www.nytimes.com/2021/08/24/h...infection.html It's been playing out real-time in Israel, Iceland, Gibraltar etc. In a sane world we would recognize the utility of proven therapeutics and protocols. But since this isn't about medicine, health, or science these mitigation are censored and outlawed to push a shot that acts as a short term therapeutic and doesn't inoculate anyone, yet people have been conditioned to think this is the exit metric for this insanity. Pro-tip.... the only exit metric is non compliance. From two weeks to flatten the curve to unknown number of shots in order to feed your family from a virus that for healthy people under 70 are at risk on oar with seasonal influenza..... and people still think this about public health. Wake the hell up. https://uploads.tapatalk-cdn.com/202...d75be9b517.jpghttps://uploads.tapatalk-cdn.com/202...d6cbf292ba.jpg Sent from my SM-G970U1 using Tapatalk |
| All times are GMT -8. The time now is 12:02 AM. |
Website Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands