Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Cargo > FedEx
MEC Vote 10-4 to approve-Similar to DAL MEC >

MEC Vote 10-4 to approve-Similar to DAL MEC

Search

Notices

MEC Vote 10-4 to approve-Similar to DAL MEC

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 08-29-2015 | 05:20 PM
  #111  
TheBaron Deux's Avatar
On Reserve
 
Joined: Aug 2015
Posts: 98
Likes: 0
From: Counting down the bid packs
Default

Originally Posted by kwri10s
Interesting read until I realized that almost all the items listed are completely different today from their 1983 counterparts. If you want to compare apples to apples you need to do just that. The milk you used as your example, is today infused with bGH so the cows can produce more volume and be milked more often, which allows dairies to lower the cost by producing a lower quality milk. You will need to compare Organic milk today with 1983 ($5+). Same with the Mustang. by the late 80s you could buy a lower quality Mustang. You have to compare the top of the line version to the 1983 version. That drastically changes the numbers. The 2012 version was $30,000 not $22,000 a 35% difference. Same for College costs, big Mac, etc.

Do I think real inflation is 6%. Probably not. But it is not as low at 2.9%. But the issue for me is what is the real cost to me out of my pocket. As I now get killed with AMT and I have less take home to spend on the same things that cost more then they did at the last contract. If I cannot afford to buy the same car that I did in the last contract without deducting from something else in my family budget, then my own personal financial improvement is negative. If I now have to buy the lower quality option, then that means my relative financial station is decreasing.

Throw in a few of the other massive give backs that have already been touched on, and I cannot project my personal financial well being improved from where it is now if I am working under this new contract.
I paid right at $15k for my 1985 Mustang GT, top of the line back then, a whopping 225 horsepower. That would put it over $36k now with 3% inflation. Today you can buy a 2016 Mustang Fastback V-6 with over 100 more horsepower, huge improvements in quality, handling, fuel economy...any metric you can name, for about $24k. My computer is better but less expensive. My 80" flatscreen cost $1000 less than the 50" it replaced. Yes, some things are more expensive; I almost never buy T-bone steaks anymore. Just as many have either gone down drastically for the same level of quality, or they have improved considerably for the same price. Is your $200 iPhone 6 no better than the $200 iPhone 4 you had in 2011? Everyone keeps focusing on what they perceive as givebacks and ignoring all the gains, or dismissing them as beneath us.
Reply
Old 08-29-2015 | 05:30 PM
  #112  
Line Holder
 
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 1,201
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by machz990
Emirates, Cathay, KAL, Quantas, Singapore, Thai, China Southern, etc. all have first class cabins and lounges. The seats are bigger, usually a cubicle or private suite, and real rest can be had vs. tossing and turning. American carriers aren't in the same league. They have no idea what service is
Flown them all but Emirates. But my point was that the future of first class travel is going to be different than what we've enjoyed in the past. 747's are going the way of the dinosaur and new 777x's and 787s generally have only business class configurations. Even for airlines like Cathey Pacific. To my knowledge, the only airline that still has the 160 pitch seats is Lufthansa. Terrible. Worse than domestic first class seats in my opinion.
I agree that agreeing to lie flat seats instead of first class is a concession, but it might have been a good card to play. "Sure, we'll give up some money on a benefit ( that is rapidly going away) ...for a gain in section X".
Reply
Old 08-29-2015 | 05:38 PM
  #113  
MaydayMark's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 4,304
Likes: 0
From: MD-11 Captain
Default

Originally Posted by TheBaron Deux

I paid right at $15k for my 1985 Mustang GT, top of the line back then,

Maybe it's just me but ... I've owned 3 Mustangs over the years and I'm not the least bit concerned about how much they cost in 1985?

I'm more than a little bit concerned about what "stuff" will cost in 2025. I don't think it's likely we'll have another TA before then!*?


Reply
Old 08-29-2015 | 05:49 PM
  #114  
machz990's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 494
Likes: 0
From: 777 CAP
Default

Originally Posted by TheBaron Deux
Not always. Took an Emirates from Dubai to CAN and it was business only, the service was mediocre and the seats were identical to Delta. Disappointed because my previous deadhead was on Emirates A-380 1st class.

Certain markets or city pairs are considered low revenue by carriers and they put substandard equipment on those legs. Anything in or out of India for example. Anything going from the mainland to Hawaii is another.
Reply
Old 08-29-2015 | 06:15 PM
  #115  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 332
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by TheBaron Deux
My 80" flatscreen cost $1000 less than the 50" it replaced. Yes, some things are more expensive; I almost never buy T-bone steaks anymore. Just as many have either gone down drastically for the same level of quality, or they have improved considerably for the same price. Is your $200 iPhone 6 no better than the $200 iPhone 4 you had in 2011? Everyone keeps focusing on what they perceive as givebacks and ignoring all the gains, or dismissing them as beneath us.
I couldn't help but notice that all the things you tout as being cheaper....Mustang, flat screen TV, iPhone are once a year (or less) purchases. I also couldn't help but notice that the one item you said you rarely buy due to cost was the food item. I went to Safeway a couple of weeks ago to buy a box of butter sticks. It cost almost $5. I also noticed that while price has remained constant on many items you actually get less quantity now. I agree Costco is awesome but when shopping for 2 Costco just isn't always practical.
Reply
Old 08-29-2015 | 06:22 PM
  #116  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 8,047
Likes: 0
From: 767 FO
Default

Originally Posted by gcsass
I couldn't help but notice that all the things you tout as being cheaper....Mustang, flat screen TV, iPhone are once a year (or less) purchases. I also couldn't help but notice that the one item you said you rarely buy due to cost was the food item. I went to Safeway a couple of weeks ago to buy a box of butter sticks. It cost almost $5. I also noticed that while price has remained constant on many items you actually get less quantity now. I agree Costco is awesome but when shopping for 2 Costco just isn't always practical.
There has got to be a Last Tango in Paris joke in there somewhere.
Reply
Old 08-29-2015 | 06:51 PM
  #117  
TheBaron Deux's Avatar
On Reserve
 
Joined: Aug 2015
Posts: 98
Likes: 0
From: Counting down the bid packs
Default

Originally Posted by MaydayMark
Maybe it's just me but ... I've owned 3 Mustangs over the years and I'm not the least bit concerned about how much they cost in 1985?

I'm more than a little bit concerned about what "stuff" will cost in 2025. I don't think it's likely we'll have another TA before then!*?


Mark, my point was that a Mustang (or probably most newer cars) haven't gone up 3% a year and they are greatly improved. What they will cost in 2025 is anybodies guess. And no matter how this vote goes, I doubt we'll have another contract much before 2025. If it gets voted down I wouldn't plan on seeing another TA until after peak of 2016. It will take 3-4 months to spool up another Negotiating Committee and come up with a new catch phrase for the lanyards.
Reply
Old 08-29-2015 | 06:57 PM
  #118  
iarapilot's Avatar
"blue collar thug"!
 
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 1,614
Likes: 0
From: A proponent of...
Default

Originally Posted by TheBaron Deux
Mark, my point was that a Mustang (or probably most newer cars) haven't gone up 3% a year and they are greatly improved. What they will cost in 2025 is anybodies guess. And no matter how this vote goes, I doubt we'll have another contract much before 2025. If it gets voted down I wouldn't plan on seeing another TA until after peak of 2016. It will take 3-4 months to spool up another Negotiating Committee and come up with a new catch phrase for the lanyards.

So be it. I understand that you think the TA is acceptable. But until we stop accepting contracts that dont address the many things that should be fixed, especially the ones that dont cost the Company, we will get what we deserve.

From my point of view, if it gets voted down, and we have to wait another year, that is the way it is. Collectively, we are still in the drivers seat. Realistically, as a group we dont see it and/or are not willing to act in a way that will get us the contract we deserve. But, you already know that, like the majority of the pilots.

If you dont stand up and demand the best you wont get it.
Reply
Old 08-29-2015 | 07:21 PM
  #119  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Feb 2013
Posts: 1,339
Likes: 0
Default

A 'purple' buddy of mine said he heard there'll be some kind of incentive for senior guys/gals to inform FDX of their retirement plans well in advance? Is that what you all have heard too? ..I'm not sure I understand how that'd benefit your company? Is it for simply planning purposes or are you really that short staffed?

Thanks
Reply
Old 08-29-2015 | 07:22 PM
  #120  
Line Holder
 
Joined: Aug 2015
Posts: 30
Likes: 0
Default

Gots this email today:

Fellow LEC 22 Pilots,

As Captain Dyer announced Thursday night, we have a Tentative Agreement. It’s being formatted and proofed as we speak. Our understanding is that you will have an electronic version by close of business Monday evening. This e-TA will show added/deleted/moved language. We will also be sending an identical product in “hard copy” during the weeks to come.

Our goal is for you to have this to read and digest before any Road Shows happen. These presentations will take place in MEM, CGN, ANC, HKG, LAX and IND. The FedEx ALPA website will house a FAQ area for your review. Webcasts and phone-in’s are planned. We’ll be using all the technology available to us in order to inform you.

All three of us voted in favor of this TA. We’ve agreed to wait for the e-Ta to hit your inbox before talking about it and answering your questions. In no way do we want to be perceived as “selling” this! Even a highlights document could be spun by someone as a sales job. So, please let us all take a deep breath and relax over the weekend.

More to follow…

Jim, Jamie and Fred
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
newKnow
Delta
80
08-23-2015 11:10 PM
TheManager
Major
9584
07-28-2015 12:15 PM
gzsg
Delta
10297
07-10-2015 01:42 PM
Superdad
Major
19
05-26-2012 06:24 PM
RockBottom
Major
0
01-07-2006 03:24 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices