Quote:
Let's give the union a chance to explain the deal before we vote no.
I call a 50 percent raise "less then owed". That has nothing to do with getting PBS. PBS is a trade for our current scheduling system and at the low rates proposed (especially for the junior folks) we better have industry leading PBS to make up for that. In negotiations you don't trade for something you should already be getting, like pay increases to industry standard. Or already have, like our QOL system, when every other airline is way ahead. We shouldn't be giving anything away period. Some shuffling around sure but giving away, no. Originally Posted by Aero1900
And I'm tired of people saying "we got nothing in exchange for pbs." What the heck do you call a 50% raise in compensation? This was a negotiation, not a hostage situation. Yes, we gave up line bidding, and in return we got big pay raises and really solid PBS work rules along with industry leading vacation. Let's give the union a chance to explain the deal before we vote no.
I keep hearing the leading PBS garbage from the union and people who know nothing about PBS that have spoken to a union member, like yourself, and I ask myself, what do they know about PBS? Have they ever worked under PBS at a crappy company? The answer is NO. So how do you know how the system works? You don't. So how can you believe what the union is selling you on the phone without showing you the language? You don't. It is better to wait for the TA language on PBS for the people who have used PBS to examine it and really really listen to what they have to say. If they don't have the language written for the TA then you better vote NO. End of story.