Search

Notices

News thread

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 05-25-2025 | 06:46 PM
  #731  
On Reserve
 
Joined: May 2025
Posts: 11
Likes: 9
Default

Originally Posted by ginntonic
Questions first. Yes I call my reps and send DARTs. No, I don't attend airport meetups. Yes I read my e-mails.

I don't need a play by play & I agree public negotiations aren't appropriate.

NC should be more transparent without laying all our cards on the table. Just because things are 'normal' doesn't mean we shouldn't question the norm.

Sharing our UNH survey results would be a good start.

How about an update to our FFT ALPA status sheet from Nov '23, which was distributed along with our economic proposal. (See negotiator newsletter #22.)

Have we amended our economic proposal to placate the company or have we stood firm with what was delivered in Nov? If yes, what's changed?

It would be nice to have a little more detail in the updates. Examples from one recent letter.

"Some larger issues remain" What issues?
"We...are in the process of developing a framework" Explain?
"The Company has shown no inclination to address any of the key issues important to Frontier pilots" What are those issues? What factors are the NC prioritizing?

No doubt the NC has their hands full and I'm not the one at the table. I also am definitely coming from a place of ignorance in terms of what constraints are placed on our team.

If we can share a full economic proposal with the pilot group, then surely we can send survey results and describe some of the meeting elements with more clarity.

You straight up said you’re coming from a place of ignorance and then wrote a whole post like you're an authority. I get it though, that just lets us know you're a real pilot.

The UNH survey was already used to shape the proposal. That’s not a secret. And no, they’re not going to release the raw polling because it gives the company a roadmap to divide us.

The economic proposal from November 2023 is still the one on the table unless something’s been TA’d, and that would be a pretty big update. We’d hear about it.

And yeah, “larger issues remain” probably means the same stuff it’s always meant—retirement, scheduling, reserve, pay. Not hard to connect the dots.

I get wanting more info, but if you’re not showing up to meetings or reading the stuff they are sending, maybe don’t act like you’re being kept in the dark.

Call your reps or send a DART. They’re actually pretty responsive.
Reply
Old 05-25-2025 | 08:48 PM
  #732  
On Reserve
 
Joined: Jun 2022
Posts: 166
Likes: 21
Default

Originally Posted by SicBankArsonist
You straight up said you’re coming from a place of ignorance
I said ignorance regarding constraints on what info could and could not be released.

Originally Posted by SicBankArsonist
They’re not going to release the raw polling because it gives the company a roadmap to divide us.
Mugatu made that same point a few posts back. I agreed his point had merit. Still, I believe it's better to release the survey data to the pilots despite that risk. Opinion difference.

Originally Posted by SicBankArsonist
The economic proposal from November 2023 is still the one on the table unless something’s been TA’d, and that would be a pretty big update. We’d hear about it.
I concede you're likely right on the economic proposal. Included with that proposal was an overall status sheet. It's been stagnant for 18 months. I think it warrants an update.

Originally Posted by SicBankArsonist
And yeah, “larger issues remain” probably means the same stuff it’s always meant—retirement, scheduling, reserve, pay. Not hard to connect the dots.
"Probably means" suggests you're guessing. You don't know for certain. Is LTD in your probably list? We should be better informed.

Originally Posted by SicBankArsonist
If you’re not showing up to meetings or reading the stuff they are sending, maybe don’t act like you’re being kept in the dark. Call your reps or send a DART. They’re actually pretty responsive.
If you read my earlier replies, while I said I don't go to airport meetups, I engage via every other pathway. I read everything that's sent, listen to the 5x5, have called & spoken with reps, and I've sent DARTs. They are responsive.

Detail heavy not so much.

And I'm not a real pilot. I just play one on TV.
Reply
Old 05-26-2025 | 11:16 AM
  #733  
Line Holder
 
Joined: Feb 2014
Posts: 1,986
Likes: 112
From: Lineholder
Default

Originally Posted by DumboDrop
Strongly disagree. We will do best by having a UNITED pilot group.
And how do you think this happens (a united group)?

First and foremost, we need information. We are a SMALL pilot group. UA/AA/DL just got new contracts and during their respective negotiations, the pilots I talked to seemed to be better informed about what the NC was seeking, how the progress was going and what was acceptable. The UA Tumi TA was a perfect example of unity. Since we don't have great info sharing, whether it's for fear of it being leaked to the company or some other reason, we have these BS dissenters and lack of harmony.

MM is the MEC president. He is NOT on the negotiating committee. He gets updates from them (albeit I sure as hell hope it's more than we get) but he is not in the room when the discussions are being had. Blaming him for ANYTHING dealing with negotiations is ignorant. From what I understand, there is a proposal to reduce the NC from 3 to 2 members and to have MM be the 3rd negotiator if/when needed. I personally think this is a bad idea but don't feel so strong as to recommend/support some sort of recall. And, if the NC has nothing new to report, then there's really nothing for them to report. We're in a tarmac delay program right now.

Everyone needs to calm the F down. Negotiations take YEARS. Part of the company's reason for doing so - besides saving money - is to frustrate the pilot group into dissension.

The ugly truth - the majors will be hiring in a couple of years and their contract cycles all start in 2026. If we don't have a contract by 2027, we should all leave. Yes, me included.
Reply
Old 05-26-2025 | 01:28 PM
  #734  
F9 Driver's Avatar
Line Holder
 
Joined: Mar 2010
Posts: 403
Likes: 5
Default

Originally Posted by dracir1
Everyone needs to calm the F down. Negotiations take YEARS. Part of the company's reason for doing so - besides saving money - is to frustrate the pilot group into dissension..
Exactly! Let's not forget that we are negotiating with Franke's mouthpiece. The HP pilots (Franke ran America West) had the longest mediated case ever at the time when they finally got an agreement giving them ~11% raises in 2002. We want 35%-50% + work rules.

Franke is a master at F ing with pilots. Saying that our NC isn't doing their job because they haven't TA'd anything besides parking is lame and ignorant of the situation. The NC could have TA's the whole thing if they agreed with the company and allowed for a cost neutral / concessionary deal. Our only legal lever under the RLA is to keep showing up at the appointed time and hoping the mediator takes pity on us (yeah yeah - going to the investment community and pleading our case - whatever). The NMB didn't work for the R.R. workers under Biden (PEB and imposed terms) and isn't likely to work for us under Trump.

When the DOT pot is empty, the planes run on time, and the pipeline is full Franke has zero incentive to do anything different unless the mediator forces him to. A change in the makeup of the NC won't change that. When the company refuses to negotiate in good faith but we aren't allowed to use self help, what strategy can the NC use to advance the talks? Pound on the desk?

When will we get a CBA? When the company decides then want to give us one. Keep updating your apps, work to live - don't live to work, and do what you need to in order to stay sane.
Reply
Old 05-26-2025 | 01:51 PM
  #735  
Line Holder
 
Joined: Mar 2021
Posts: 1,768
Likes: 28
Default

Bill Franke is 88 years old.

Not sure he is "F-ing with Pilots" anymore.

(this is not to say BB and others are not)

Based on investor webcasts, MEC communication, the "contract talks" is lacking the "talk" part.

Anybody negotiated with a fence post? How did that go.

BB has zero incentive to talk.
Reply
Old 05-26-2025 | 02:44 PM
  #736  
Thread Starter
Almost there
 
Joined: Apr 2021
Posts: 2,011
Likes: 144
Default

Originally Posted by hercretired
Bill Franke is 88 years old.

Not sure he is "F-ing with Pilots" anymore.

(this is not to say BB and others are not)

Based on investor webcasts, MEC communication, the "contract talks" is lacking the "talk" part.

Anybody negotiated with a fence post? How did that go.

BB has zero incentive to talk.

“Negotiated with fence post” Haha. Reminded me of the time that United pilot negotiated with the parking gate at Denver with an axe. Classic!
Reply
Old 05-26-2025 | 03:09 PM
  #737  
Line Holder
 
Joined: Mar 2019
Posts: 494
Likes: 3
Default

Originally Posted by hercretired
Bill Franke is 88 years old.

Not sure he is "F-ing with Pilots" anymore.
Be careful. You know what they say about pr#cks living forever....

He probably gets his jollies pis$ing off pilots.
Reply
Old 05-26-2025 | 04:19 PM
  #738  
F9 Driver's Avatar
Line Holder
 
Joined: Mar 2010
Posts: 403
Likes: 5
Default

Originally Posted by HSCompressor
Be careful. You know what they say about pr#cks living forever....

He probably gets his jollies pis$ing off pilots.
He, and his two sons, are still very capable of F ing with us.

And, I was wrong about the 2002 HP contract. Their "contract 2000" was signed in 2004.
Reply
Old 08-26-2025 | 10:34 AM
  #739  
Thread Starter
Almost there
 
Joined: Apr 2021
Posts: 2,011
Likes: 144
Default

https://stocks.apple.com/ALqCldSV_Rq6KzKSS2_3ACQ

Barry is in attack mode.
Reply
Old 08-26-2025 | 11:16 AM
  #740  
On Reserve
 
Joined: Jul 2024
Posts: 59
Likes: 7
Default

https://www.travelweekly.com/Travel-...-restructuring

Watch this space..
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
kuma66
Air Wisconsin
3
04-21-2019 03:11 AM
Planetrain
Delta
90
10-27-2018 08:45 PM
iahflyr
SkyWest
1273
08-27-2017 03:46 AM
Bocaflyer
Fractional
26
06-26-2007 09:13 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices