Search

Notices

Frontier Hiring.

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 08-17-2013 | 05:31 PM
  #191  
ERJdude's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 137
Likes: 0
From: 320
Default

Originally Posted by RockyMntAV8R
I have been waiting for this to be brought up. I think Oskee is correct and F9 is legally required to fill such positions in accordance with this ruling at this time. The last time F9 filled open positions they did so in accordance with this ruling. As much as I want the seperation to be complete asap, the fact is as of today it is not. I can see the possibility of a huge lawsuit looming on the horizon from this disregard of the ruling. All of us at F9 want the list seperated as soon as possible, no one more than me. As long as F9 is part of the RAH nightmare I believe we have to live by the ruling. I don't know why RAH decided not to abide by the ruling and hire from the outside.
So what happens to those hired during this latest window from Frontier? I'd assume that they wouldn't just hire without thinking this dilemma through.
Reply
Old 08-17-2013 | 05:35 PM
  #192  
Line Holder
 
Joined: Sep 2010
Posts: 35
Likes: 0
From: MD-80 Right
Default

Probably too hard to replace them at RAH if they put them on the F9 cert.
Reply
Old 08-17-2013 | 05:50 PM
  #193  
Line Holder
 
Joined: Nov 2012
Posts: 71
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by ERJdude
So what happens to those hired during this latest window from Frontier? I'd assume that they wouldn't just hire without thinking this dilemma through.
I don't know. You would think the company would consult with their counsel before hiring ouside of the arbitration ruling and perhaps they have. This is just my opinion on this matter. There is no doubt we will have some baggage to deal with If and/or when the seperation is complete.
Reply
Old 08-17-2013 | 06:49 PM
  #194  
Banned
 
Joined: Mar 2009
Posts: 798
Likes: 0
From: 757 Capt
Default

Originally Posted by JoeyMeatballs
"RJ pukes"? Really? Congrats on being the TOTD............
Negative.

RJ's are a plague. They are miserable for passengers and they ruin pilot careers. Indefensible. No two ways about it.

PIPE
Reply
Old 08-17-2013 | 07:30 PM
  #195  
On Reserve
 
Joined: Jan 2010
Posts: 76
Likes: 0
From: A319 Left
Default

Originally Posted by RockyMntAV8R
I have been waiting for this to be brought up. I think Oskee is correct and F9 is legally required to fill such positions in accordance with this ruling at this time. The last time F9 filled open positions they did so in accordance with this ruling. As much as I want the seperation to be complete asap, the fact is as of today it is not. I can see the possibility of a huge lawsuit looming on the horizon from this disregard of the ruling. All of us at F9 want the list seperated as soon as possible, no one more than me. As long as F9 is part of the RAH nightmare I believe we have to live by the ruling. I don't know why RAH decided not to abide by the ruling and hire from the outside.

The last time F9 filled open positions. The ones that maintained IMSL seniority were the furloughs. There are no longer any furloughs as everyone has had a chance to return to one of the four companies.

These open positions are first officer positions and, from what I understand of the Chatauqua CBA, none of the first officers at the other 3 airlines are allowed by their CBA to voluntarily switch certificates. The captains at the other 3 airlines are unable to bid first officer positions again. Any captain positions that come as a result of this hiring are still fenced.

There is not yet an amalgamated contract or transition agreement.

If I am wrong, please correct me with references to where this is allowed in the Chautauqua CBA. I would very much like to have the information.
Reply
Old 08-17-2013 | 07:38 PM
  #196  
gasnhaul's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 568
Likes: 0
From: Stuck in Purple Limbo
Default

Originally Posted by capthrs
Sorry, I don't mean to offend anybody and I am not implying that anyone who got interviews thus far are not deserving of them BUT.... I thought that having a silver bullet was suppose to do something for you above and beyond someone without an internal rec.

If I understand correctly, I am seeing that people without Silver Bullets or internal recs are being called for interviews. I have 5500 TT, 1300 TPIC 121 and a clean record in all respects. Anyone from F9 have any guidance or input they could throw out regarding this phenomenon. Thanks
Actually I'm seeing a really weird trend. You have TPIC...that seems to be a hinderance rather than a help nowadays. Sure wish I would have known several years ago that having PIC time seems to be a bad thing. If you look at the threads of airlines that are hiring and then see who is getting the calls a LOT of the folks are FOs with ZERO TPIC. "Back in the day" (not sure what day specifically so don't ask) all I was told was get heavy, international PIC time and you can write your own ticket. Well that's what I did and it seemed to make sense. Could have gone to any commuter and flown with them but thought that would be a career killer. So, now here I am watching guys with similar total times or less (or much less) and no PIC getting calls while I just sit and stare at my phone. Not saying I'm any better of a pilot or anything like that (and if you ask anyone that's flown with me they can verify that) but usually when you look at an applicant, those with the most checked boxes usually win...or so I thought. It's just frustrating to me that it seems nowadays those guys with TPIC are determined to be less desiable to hire for some reason.
Reply
Old 08-17-2013 | 08:09 PM
  #197  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Jun 2009
Posts: 1,097
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by RockyMntAV8R
I have been waiting for this to be brought up. I think Oskee is correct and F9 is legally required to fill such positions in accordance with this ruling at this time. The last time F9 filled open positions they did so in accordance with this ruling. As much as I want the seperation to be complete asap, the fact is as of today it is not. I can see the possibility of a huge lawsuit looming on the horizon from this disregard of the ruling. All of us at F9 want the list seperated as soon as possible, no one more than me. As long as F9 is part of the RAH nightmare I believe we have to live by the ruling. I don't know why RAH decided not to abide by the ruling and hire from the outside.

The last time F9 filled open positions. The ones that maintained IMSL seniority were the furloughs. There are no longer any furloughs as everyone has had a chance to return to one of the four companies.

These open positions are first officer positions and, from what I understand of the Chatauqua CBA, none of the first officers at the other 3 airlines are allowed by their CBA to voluntarily switch certificates. The captains at the other 3 airlines are unable to bid first officer positions again. Any captain positions that come as a result of this hiring are still fenced.

There is not yet an amalgamated contract or transition agreement.

If I am wrong, please correct me with references to where this is allowed in the Chautauqua CBA. I would very much like to have the information.
An arbitration decision regarding an IMSL between separate lists sets the law for vacancies. Eischen made that ruling and it's pretty clear.
Reply
Old 08-17-2013 | 08:14 PM
  #198  
Line Holder
 
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 28
Likes: 0
Default

Enter Content
Reply
Old 08-17-2013 | 08:32 PM
  #199  
Vegaspilot's Avatar
Gets Tue/Wed and Sat Off
 
Joined: Oct 2008
Posts: 559
Likes: 0
Default

I know someone who was called for an interview. While they do have some TPIC, they were also ex-Lynx, so I don't know if that may have helped.
Reply
Old 08-17-2013 | 08:35 PM
  #200  
Line Holder
 
Joined: Nov 2012
Posts: 71
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by Bulldog319
The last time F9 filled open positions. The ones that maintained IMSL seniority were the furloughs. There are no longer any furloughs as everyone has had a chance to return to one of the four companies.

These open positions are first officer positions and, from what I understand of the Chatauqua CBA, none of the first officers at the other 3 airlines are allowed by their CBA to voluntarily switch certificates. The captains at the other 3 airlines are unable to bid first officer positions again. Any captain positions that come as a result of this hiring are still fenced.

There is not yet an amalgamated contract or transition agreement.

If I am wrong, please correct me with references to where this is allowed in the Chautauqua CBA. I would very much like to have the information.
Bulldog, I don't know if you are right or wrong, this is a gigantic mess with the potential to get even messier. I agree that the ones who maintained seniority were the furloughed Midwest guys. But there were RAH pilots that were allowed to resign their seniorty rights and hire into the airbus at F9 that were not on furlough, if I remember correctly. The RAH FOs that were not on furlough did not voluntairly swith certificates as they resigned seniority rights at RAH and started over at F9 (on the bottom of the list). I agree that any Captain positions that may become available are protected by the 7 year fence.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Bucking Bar
Frontier
15
07-24-2011 07:07 PM
lolwut
Major
25
12-01-2010 04:03 AM
4 Fan Trashcan
Mergers and Acquisitions
7
01-28-2009 09:27 AM
Ak Pilot
Major
7
07-10-2008 09:30 AM
Freight Dog
Hiring News
3
09-29-2005 04:02 AM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices