Search
Notices

Frontier Hiring.

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 08-17-2013, 05:31 PM
  #191  
Gets Weekends Off
 
ERJdude's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Aug 2007
Position: 320
Posts: 137
Default

Originally Posted by RockyMntAV8R View Post
I have been waiting for this to be brought up. I think Oskee is correct and F9 is legally required to fill such positions in accordance with this ruling at this time. The last time F9 filled open positions they did so in accordance with this ruling. As much as I want the seperation to be complete asap, the fact is as of today it is not. I can see the possibility of a huge lawsuit looming on the horizon from this disregard of the ruling. All of us at F9 want the list seperated as soon as possible, no one more than me. As long as F9 is part of the RAH nightmare I believe we have to live by the ruling. I don't know why RAH decided not to abide by the ruling and hire from the outside.
So what happens to those hired during this latest window from Frontier? I'd assume that they wouldn't just hire without thinking this dilemma through.
ERJdude is offline  
Old 08-17-2013, 05:35 PM
  #192  
Line Holder
 
Joined APC: Sep 2010
Position: MD-80 Right
Posts: 35
Default

Probably too hard to replace them at RAH if they put them on the F9 cert.
DHC2floater is offline  
Old 08-17-2013, 05:50 PM
  #193  
Line Holder
 
Joined APC: Nov 2012
Posts: 71
Default

Originally Posted by ERJdude View Post
So what happens to those hired during this latest window from Frontier? I'd assume that they wouldn't just hire without thinking this dilemma through.
I don't know. You would think the company would consult with their counsel before hiring ouside of the arbitration ruling and perhaps they have. This is just my opinion on this matter. There is no doubt we will have some baggage to deal with If and/or when the seperation is complete.
RockyMntAV8R is offline  
Old 08-17-2013, 06:49 PM
  #194  
Banned
 
Joined APC: Mar 2009
Position: 757 Capt
Posts: 798
Default

Originally Posted by JoeyMeatballs View Post
"RJ pukes"? Really? Congrats on being the TOTD............
Negative.

RJ's are a plague. They are miserable for passengers and they ruin pilot careers. Indefensible. No two ways about it.

PIPE
pipe is offline  
Old 08-17-2013, 07:30 PM
  #195  
Line Holder
 
Joined APC: Jan 2010
Position: A319 Left
Posts: 74
Default

Originally Posted by RockyMntAV8R View Post
I have been waiting for this to be brought up. I think Oskee is correct and F9 is legally required to fill such positions in accordance with this ruling at this time. The last time F9 filled open positions they did so in accordance with this ruling. As much as I want the seperation to be complete asap, the fact is as of today it is not. I can see the possibility of a huge lawsuit looming on the horizon from this disregard of the ruling. All of us at F9 want the list seperated as soon as possible, no one more than me. As long as F9 is part of the RAH nightmare I believe we have to live by the ruling. I don't know why RAH decided not to abide by the ruling and hire from the outside.

The last time F9 filled open positions. The ones that maintained IMSL seniority were the furloughs. There are no longer any furloughs as everyone has had a chance to return to one of the four companies.

These open positions are first officer positions and, from what I understand of the Chatauqua CBA, none of the first officers at the other 3 airlines are allowed by their CBA to voluntarily switch certificates. The captains at the other 3 airlines are unable to bid first officer positions again. Any captain positions that come as a result of this hiring are still fenced.

There is not yet an amalgamated contract or transition agreement.

If I am wrong, please correct me with references to where this is allowed in the Chautauqua CBA. I would very much like to have the information.
Bulldog319 is offline  
Old 08-17-2013, 07:38 PM
  #196  
Gets Weekends Off
 
gasnhaul's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jan 2007
Position: Stuck in Purple Limbo
Posts: 568
Default

Originally Posted by capthrs View Post
Sorry, I don't mean to offend anybody and I am not implying that anyone who got interviews thus far are not deserving of them BUT.... I thought that having a silver bullet was suppose to do something for you above and beyond someone without an internal rec.

If I understand correctly, I am seeing that people without Silver Bullets or internal recs are being called for interviews. I have 5500 TT, 1300 TPIC 121 and a clean record in all respects. Anyone from F9 have any guidance or input they could throw out regarding this phenomenon. Thanks
Actually I'm seeing a really weird trend. You have TPIC...that seems to be a hinderance rather than a help nowadays. Sure wish I would have known several years ago that having PIC time seems to be a bad thing. If you look at the threads of airlines that are hiring and then see who is getting the calls a LOT of the folks are FOs with ZERO TPIC. "Back in the day" (not sure what day specifically so don't ask) all I was told was get heavy, international PIC time and you can write your own ticket. Well that's what I did and it seemed to make sense. Could have gone to any commuter and flown with them but thought that would be a career killer. So, now here I am watching guys with similar total times or less (or much less) and no PIC getting calls while I just sit and stare at my phone. Not saying I'm any better of a pilot or anything like that (and if you ask anyone that's flown with me they can verify that) but usually when you look at an applicant, those with the most checked boxes usually win...or so I thought. It's just frustrating to me that it seems nowadays those guys with TPIC are determined to be less desiable to hire for some reason.
gasnhaul is offline  
Old 08-17-2013, 08:09 PM
  #197  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jun 2009
Posts: 1,097
Default

Originally Posted by RockyMntAV8R View Post
I have been waiting for this to be brought up. I think Oskee is correct and F9 is legally required to fill such positions in accordance with this ruling at this time. The last time F9 filled open positions they did so in accordance with this ruling. As much as I want the seperation to be complete asap, the fact is as of today it is not. I can see the possibility of a huge lawsuit looming on the horizon from this disregard of the ruling. All of us at F9 want the list seperated as soon as possible, no one more than me. As long as F9 is part of the RAH nightmare I believe we have to live by the ruling. I don't know why RAH decided not to abide by the ruling and hire from the outside.

The last time F9 filled open positions. The ones that maintained IMSL seniority were the furloughs. There are no longer any furloughs as everyone has had a chance to return to one of the four companies.

These open positions are first officer positions and, from what I understand of the Chatauqua CBA, none of the first officers at the other 3 airlines are allowed by their CBA to voluntarily switch certificates. The captains at the other 3 airlines are unable to bid first officer positions again. Any captain positions that come as a result of this hiring are still fenced.

There is not yet an amalgamated contract or transition agreement.

If I am wrong, please correct me with references to where this is allowed in the Chautauqua CBA. I would very much like to have the information.
An arbitration decision regarding an IMSL between separate lists sets the law for vacancies. Eischen made that ruling and it's pretty clear.
TillerEnvy is offline  
Old 08-17-2013, 08:14 PM
  #198  
Line Holder
 
Joined APC: Feb 2007
Posts: 28
Default

Enter Content
TheGeneralMcC is offline  
Old 08-17-2013, 08:32 PM
  #199  
Gets Tue/Wed and Sat Off
 
Vegaspilot's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Oct 2008
Posts: 551
Default

I know someone who was called for an interview. While they do have some TPIC, they were also ex-Lynx, so I don't know if that may have helped.
Vegaspilot is offline  
Old 08-17-2013, 08:35 PM
  #200  
Line Holder
 
Joined APC: Nov 2012
Posts: 71
Default

Originally Posted by Bulldog319 View Post
The last time F9 filled open positions. The ones that maintained IMSL seniority were the furloughs. There are no longer any furloughs as everyone has had a chance to return to one of the four companies.

These open positions are first officer positions and, from what I understand of the Chatauqua CBA, none of the first officers at the other 3 airlines are allowed by their CBA to voluntarily switch certificates. The captains at the other 3 airlines are unable to bid first officer positions again. Any captain positions that come as a result of this hiring are still fenced.

There is not yet an amalgamated contract or transition agreement.

If I am wrong, please correct me with references to where this is allowed in the Chautauqua CBA. I would very much like to have the information.
Bulldog, I don't know if you are right or wrong, this is a gigantic mess with the potential to get even messier. I agree that the ones who maintained seniority were the furloughed Midwest guys. But there were RAH pilots that were allowed to resign their seniorty rights and hire into the airbus at F9 that were not on furlough, if I remember correctly. The RAH FOs that were not on furlough did not voluntairly swith certificates as they resigned seniority rights at RAH and started over at F9 (on the bottom of the list). I agree that any Captain positions that may become available are protected by the 7 year fence.
RockyMntAV8R is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Bucking Bar
Frontier
15
07-24-2011 07:07 PM
lolwut
Major
24
12-01-2010 03:21 AM
4 Fan Trashcan
Mergers and Acquisitions
7
01-28-2009 09:27 AM
Ak Pilot
Major
7
07-10-2008 09:30 AM
Freight Dog
Hiring News
3
09-29-2005 04:02 AM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices