Frontier Hiring.
#191
I have been waiting for this to be brought up. I think Oskee is correct and F9 is legally required to fill such positions in accordance with this ruling at this time. The last time F9 filled open positions they did so in accordance with this ruling. As much as I want the seperation to be complete asap, the fact is as of today it is not. I can see the possibility of a huge lawsuit looming on the horizon from this disregard of the ruling. All of us at F9 want the list seperated as soon as possible, no one more than me. As long as F9 is part of the RAH nightmare I believe we have to live by the ruling. I don't know why RAH decided not to abide by the ruling and hire from the outside.
#193
Line Holder
Joined APC: Nov 2012
Posts: 71
I don't know. You would think the company would consult with their counsel before hiring ouside of the arbitration ruling and perhaps they have. This is just my opinion on this matter. There is no doubt we will have some baggage to deal with If and/or when the seperation is complete.
#194
Banned
Joined APC: Mar 2009
Position: 757 Capt
Posts: 798
#195
Line Holder
Joined APC: Jan 2010
Position: A319 Left
Posts: 74
I have been waiting for this to be brought up. I think Oskee is correct and F9 is legally required to fill such positions in accordance with this ruling at this time. The last time F9 filled open positions they did so in accordance with this ruling. As much as I want the seperation to be complete asap, the fact is as of today it is not. I can see the possibility of a huge lawsuit looming on the horizon from this disregard of the ruling. All of us at F9 want the list seperated as soon as possible, no one more than me. As long as F9 is part of the RAH nightmare I believe we have to live by the ruling. I don't know why RAH decided not to abide by the ruling and hire from the outside.
The last time F9 filled open positions. The ones that maintained IMSL seniority were the furloughs. There are no longer any furloughs as everyone has had a chance to return to one of the four companies.
These open positions are first officer positions and, from what I understand of the Chatauqua CBA, none of the first officers at the other 3 airlines are allowed by their CBA to voluntarily switch certificates. The captains at the other 3 airlines are unable to bid first officer positions again. Any captain positions that come as a result of this hiring are still fenced.
There is not yet an amalgamated contract or transition agreement.
If I am wrong, please correct me with references to where this is allowed in the Chautauqua CBA. I would very much like to have the information.
#196
Sorry, I don't mean to offend anybody and I am not implying that anyone who got interviews thus far are not deserving of them BUT.... I thought that having a silver bullet was suppose to do something for you above and beyond someone without an internal rec.
If I understand correctly, I am seeing that people without Silver Bullets or internal recs are being called for interviews. I have 5500 TT, 1300 TPIC 121 and a clean record in all respects. Anyone from F9 have any guidance or input they could throw out regarding this phenomenon. Thanks
If I understand correctly, I am seeing that people without Silver Bullets or internal recs are being called for interviews. I have 5500 TT, 1300 TPIC 121 and a clean record in all respects. Anyone from F9 have any guidance or input they could throw out regarding this phenomenon. Thanks
#197
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Jun 2009
Posts: 1,097
I have been waiting for this to be brought up. I think Oskee is correct and F9 is legally required to fill such positions in accordance with this ruling at this time. The last time F9 filled open positions they did so in accordance with this ruling. As much as I want the seperation to be complete asap, the fact is as of today it is not. I can see the possibility of a huge lawsuit looming on the horizon from this disregard of the ruling. All of us at F9 want the list seperated as soon as possible, no one more than me. As long as F9 is part of the RAH nightmare I believe we have to live by the ruling. I don't know why RAH decided not to abide by the ruling and hire from the outside.
The last time F9 filled open positions. The ones that maintained IMSL seniority were the furloughs. There are no longer any furloughs as everyone has had a chance to return to one of the four companies.
These open positions are first officer positions and, from what I understand of the Chatauqua CBA, none of the first officers at the other 3 airlines are allowed by their CBA to voluntarily switch certificates. The captains at the other 3 airlines are unable to bid first officer positions again. Any captain positions that come as a result of this hiring are still fenced.
There is not yet an amalgamated contract or transition agreement.
If I am wrong, please correct me with references to where this is allowed in the Chautauqua CBA. I would very much like to have the information.
#200
Line Holder
Joined APC: Nov 2012
Posts: 71
The last time F9 filled open positions. The ones that maintained IMSL seniority were the furloughs. There are no longer any furloughs as everyone has had a chance to return to one of the four companies.
These open positions are first officer positions and, from what I understand of the Chatauqua CBA, none of the first officers at the other 3 airlines are allowed by their CBA to voluntarily switch certificates. The captains at the other 3 airlines are unable to bid first officer positions again. Any captain positions that come as a result of this hiring are still fenced.
There is not yet an amalgamated contract or transition agreement.
If I am wrong, please correct me with references to where this is allowed in the Chautauqua CBA. I would very much like to have the information.
These open positions are first officer positions and, from what I understand of the Chatauqua CBA, none of the first officers at the other 3 airlines are allowed by their CBA to voluntarily switch certificates. The captains at the other 3 airlines are unable to bid first officer positions again. Any captain positions that come as a result of this hiring are still fenced.
There is not yet an amalgamated contract or transition agreement.
If I am wrong, please correct me with references to where this is allowed in the Chautauqua CBA. I would very much like to have the information.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
4 Fan Trashcan
Mergers and Acquisitions
7
01-28-2009 09:27 AM